MovieChat Forums > Ant1238 > Replies
Ant1238's Replies
Erm, sure, but that doesn't have anything to do with my question...
They are humans who don't want there to be anyone out there with superpowers.
She got killed by her cocaine boy-toy.
Yes, most has nothing to do with it, I didn't mistype.
The entire plotline about them having to split up and go find their tokens that takes up the entire middle of the movie, you won't find one second of that in the novel. Complete fabrication for the film.
The same with Mike telling them about the Native American folklore, and then having lied about it--all for the movie.
How about that magic spear? Movie. Not book. Just movie.
Like I said, hate on the movie all you want, and hate on King if you want too for all I care, go nuts, you just happen to be hating on King for an incorrect reason.
Most of what you said wasn’t in the book, it was written for the film. If you don’t like it, that’s cool, but King has nothing to do with it.
That's what I thought--so why is Darlene still playing her lounge gig in Reno that she was detesting so much, the one the big shot was telling her in the flashback that she'd have to resort to doing if she was broke?
Can't remember what this was in reference to?
Woah cv1cv, you're a nutjob. The dude posted his review of the movie. He didn't claim to be a professional movie critic, but whether you like it or not, a collection of thoughts about a film is indeed a review. That word doesn't carry as much weight as you seem to think it does.
(And if your point here is to defend the movie for some reason, sorry, it sucked.)
Do you have a link or something where anyone who worked on the film says this? Everything I've read on IMDb, Wikipedia, etc. makes no mention of the two films ever being related in any way other than the title.
Erm, no.
Ehh, not if you've had THAT much. No amount of terrifying news can bring you around when you literally can't stand up or make a coherent sentence.