MovieChat Forums > chefao > Replies
chefao's Replies
Uh? Can you repeat that? I was looking at her boobas
Any woman who doesn't make me hard is not qualified to be an actress. Simple as.
Lmao only after reading your comment I realized that was Batista wtf it's been like 20+ years since I watched wrestling now I know why he looked familiar lmao
So you're saying bald people aren't human?
Oh no, baldbros...
Lol I don't get it either, it's literally just three things (emperor, great houses, sand people) and people say it's hard to follow wtf???
Meh, I thought her acting was acceptable. It's just that the role itself felt kind of boring. For example in the final fight with Feyd it would feel more visceral if she felt concerned about Paul and showed audible concern that Feyd would then pick up on, instead of having her be always trying to be stoic and angry at everything, which just feels stupid.
lol
Wrong!!!! It's obviously not the experimental gene therapy redefined as "vaccine" in our post-2020 dictionaries, it's some other thing... like... climate change! That's what did it and it's your fault!
If you think this movie has any "hero" you might have brain damage.
It was kind of goofy but also kind of stylish, I had the same feelings exactly
I liked it too.
The ending episodes were a bit lacking but it's a cool show.
>But why is Korea/Japan so much worse than the western world? (or especially Korea)
It's not that much worse:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_total_fertility_rate
>Contraception, pornography, work culture, general societal change. All of these influences to birth rate have nothing to do with being gay.
Yes but while this is an interesting topic it has nothing to do with my original point of gayness by definition being abnormal since it doesn't lead to healthy reproductive behavior.
If you want to be abnormal then be abnormal, I don't care. Just don't pretend and create this fantasy where the abnormal is normal.
>Do you think that the 80% of the population not subbed to Netflix have "checked out", and if so, did so specifically because they don't like woke content?
No not the 80%, there's of course very young and very elderly people that don't really count here, but this idea that the whole nation and the whole world is glued to netflix is ridiculous, many people simply don't care and are checked out of pozzed media and yes I think many of them are annoyed by it and don't watch it anymore because of that, I know I am one of them and I know many others who are the same and watch mostly older stuff.
>Not what I meant. Most TV shows aren't progressive or conservative. But since you characterize any TV show that shows LGBT people in a positive light as "progressive", and many are successful, that means that "go woke go broke" isn't really an inherent thing in terms of TV.
I never said anything about "go woke go broke". I don't think that's true at all it's just a cringe cope by conservatives. You can alienate a vast population and still be profitable. I will voice my discontent and so will others.
>It is true though that the alt-right sphere who rant on online TV shows are barely creatives. Almost every single modern music group or project, tv, film, video game would be more identifiable as being socially progressive than conservative. There's a reason the Daily Wires creative content is a joke.
I know plenty of creatives who I have no idea if they are "right" or "left". I don't care. Those are the ones I like. You seem to think all of them are progressive for whatever reason. Also it's hilarious you bring up the Daily Wire as some kind of representative of right wing values when it's a gatekeeper organization run by jews. Oh oops I said the J word again, here I am noticing patterns and what mafia is running the show on both sides.
>Third-world countries have more kids because the cultures there are much more domestic and agricultural. And a lack of contraceptions.
>Poor people in Korea live quite differently to poor people in Nigeria. The cultures are fundamentally different.
Yes, not only that but as you get rid of infant mortality the whole idea of having tons of kids stops making sense. The technological advancements are multi-faceted so I would never say this topic can be explained by one thing alone however I will say contraceptives are for sure the biggest factor. This is a material barrier that avoids the consequences of what is mostly inevitable biology for most humans. It is what it is.
>But this doesn't have much to do with porn. I am sure South Koreans who know how can get porn, but restricting it seems to make little difference.
I would be careful using this information to imply it would have the same effect on different societies (namely western ones) but it is interesting and worth noting, I am curious what the young men in these countries have to say about ease of access to porn.
>Your thoughts on Koreas and Japans crippling work culture potentially contributing to this?
It makes sense that it would be a factor but on the other hand there are plenty of other countries in the west who also have very low birthrates with a different work culture. Actually the 2022 birthrate list on the wiki lists countries such as Greece, Portugal, Italy and others all below Japan.
My opinion on this is that for the first time in human history we now have to justify not entering the door of pure rational nihilism that previous generations were mostly not aware even existed, having to justify the good reasons on why building a family is a worthwhile project.
Anyway this is a bit outside the scope of hating the gays which is what I am here to do lol
Look up the definition of "mass shootings" and don't give me this excuse of "gang shootings". The reality is that mass shootings related to any sort of white supremacy ideology are very rare and extensively covered in the highly censored controlled media while racially motivated crimes done by blacks are covered up
>Sex Education is one of Netflixs most watched TV shows. Why is this?
What are you talking about, that's not even in their top 10. What is even your point by saying that netflix claims these shows had a relatively high viewership by people subscribed to their service this means what exactly?
From a quick search the number of people subbed to netflix (according to them) in the US is something around 20% of the population.
Do you understand there's a whole universe of 50+% out there who have checked out? I am speaking in their behalf.
>What 'coincidences'? I'm sorry the TV and film industry has a progressive leaning. Sometimes it leans too far and we get garbage like Velma, but at the same time, almost no modern entertainment of repute is right-wing or socially conservative.
I guess it's impossible for you to think about a world where movies aren't meant to be propaganda pieces for "the progressives" or "the conservatives" and are just meant to be art where people can get away from the world. And because they think like you do, it's why everything sucks these days.
>Work-life balance and lack of disposable income is by far the most common denominator. You are aware of South Korea and Japan's crippling work culture, right? I think pornography is pretty banned in South Korea, ironically.
If income was really the biggest problem then none of the poor people of the past would've had so many kids as they did. It is of course one of the dimensions of the problem, I don't deny that but I believe access to contraceptives and porn to be the biggest game changers compared to the realities of previous generations. I'm sure they can still get porn in SK by using vpns and some kind of black markets but I didn't know they banned porn, I'll look it up. I would say that children today are seen as a burden instead of a help and many people lack the will to want to build their own families to begin with. It's a crisis of meaning and purpose caused by technological advancements.
>Don't suggest fascist ideas, and perhaps people won't call you fascist.
What do you think are "fascist ideas"? How does not liking gays somehow relates uniquely to 1930's Italy?
>Do you think "Jewish people" all specifically root for and push one particular ideology, and any instance where some Jewish producer in entertainment who may be specifically ideologically inclined is because has Jewish ancestry?
No. Noone thinks it's "all", that's your oversimplification of things. If we go back a few decades and I say there's a problem with the Italian mafia subverting our society that doesn't mean I'm saying ALL Italians have some sort of genetic defect that causes them to be mafiosi. Isn't it interesting how we can freely talk about one but not the other?
>What stat? Their birth rates? This widely reported. Why would they lie? China is outright homophobic. Are you aware of their laws?
They lie, we lie, the truth is we can't really trust any stat coming from there. I already told you the word homophobic has no meaning so I don't know what you mean here and it doesn't really matter so it's irrelevant.
>The terms are not remotely the same. Those are racial slurs, where as "homophobic" is a judgement about your attitude towards gay people.
Phobia means irrational fear of something. Someone saying they don't want gayness to be promoted has nothing to do with a phobia as it is not a fear and it's not even irrational. Any sentence that utilizes that word is without meaning.
I don't think you want to go over which demographic is very very disproportionately involved in mass shootings.... you can't handle the truth!