According to IMDB, the blatant Hollyweird agenda to pervert family shows is a GOOD thing.
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls025720609/videoplayer/vi529775129?pf_rd_m=A2FGELUUNOQJNL&pf_rd_p=aba25f3d-0e70-44a7-ba6c-d928f35d15b9&pf_rd_r=EE7PXD304BWDES1MSHZN&pf_rd_s=center-3&pf_rd_t=15061&pf_rd_i=homepage&ref_=hm_vd_tde_sm
About all this Sabrina has in common with the 1990's series starring Melissa Joan Hart and the 1960's comics that inspired it are the characters and basic premise. It starts in roughly the same place but quickly diverges onto another path. Kind of like a Harry Potter for older audiences, where the witches do in fact worship and serve Satan. This version is based on a more recent comic series that shares its name. With dark themes and plenty of gore this is definitely not a show for young kids.
It's up to parents to look at the content rating; if you have children too young for this program and subscribe to Netflix, you really need to set the parental controls because there's plenty of other content the little ones shouldn't be watching. It bugs me when people are too lazy to do that simple thing and then complain about a show being age inappropriate.
Come on, are you honestly going to tell me if they did a Romero style zombie apocalypse remake of Full House you wouldn't be curious enough to at least watch the first episode? Or how about a remake of Knight Rider where Michael was a vigilante figure more like The Punisher and his trusty sidekick KITT was a scary AI with unclear (possibly sinister) motives? What do you think: do audiences these days have a taste for darker content than they did 25 years ago, or does this shift simply reflect the passing of the censorship environment that prevailed in the heyday of the "Big Three" networks?
Pretty sure the original was "Satanic" too, just in a less overt, more child-friendly way, which actually makes it more dangerous, if anything.
share"Hollyweird agenda to pervert family shows"?
Man, you have worms in your brain.