MovieChat Forums > Wormwood (2017) Discussion > A showcase of what’s both amazing and fr...

A showcase of what’s both amazing and frustrating about Netflix (and/or OTT content providers)



The positive side is that the production value of Wormwood is amazing. It’s right up there with a high quality Hollywood release. (It was nice to finally see Netflix allow an aspect ratio wider than 1.85:1, too.) The cinematography, the score, the casting, period-accurate motifs, etc., it was all very impressive. The story is great (which is what really matters), with Errol Morris adding another worthy addition to his legacy of work.

The downside, however, is Netflix’s over obsession with series. What would have made an excellent 2 hour documentary was instead stretched out into 6(!) pieces. By the 4th installment, I could barely handle the recreations anymore— no matter how well they were shot. I was totally hooked on the story, but watching it all in one sitting was sometimes excruciating.

Series can be great if the material genuinely deserves that format, but this didn’t feel like a series— it felt like a documentary that was needlessly stretched out by order of Netflix. As a documentary under 2 hours, I think I would’ve have easily rated it an 8.


reply

In a world of dumb shows and dumber movies, I'll take this and ask for more. Smart and well made.

reply

That’s true, and I agree with you. I guess I was I coming at this from a documentary film perspective, where the bar is already set high (compared to factual TV), and even higher for an Errol Morris film. But, compared to what exists out there in the vast world of TV and movies, this is absolutely a top tier production. Smart and well made, as you said.

reply

I can see your point but I don't completely agree. Personally I didn't mind the length, as it enabled the show to really flesh out the story of what happened and get Olson's son's thoughts and feelings and interpretations on this 6-decade nightmare he's gone through. There were times when it felt a bit longer than it had to be, to me, for instance the recreations got a little gratuitous sometimes, but overall I thought it was done well enough. Maybe it could have been five episodes rather than six. But I don't think it could have been cut down to two hours without losing a lot.

Even as it was, I think they missed a little. They didn't go beyond a brief mention, which kind of came out of nowhere and then went nowhere, of the fact that Olson objected to brutal interrogations the CIA was doing in Europe. Interrogations of whom, and for what? What exactly happened during these interrogations? A little explanation of that would have been nice. It just felt out of the blue. I also felt the issue of US biological warfare in Korea wasn't explored as much as it should have been.

reply

There are less than a handful of shows that justify their length... They're better off being mini-series... 4 episodes...

Even an anthology series like Black Mirror feels bloated and unrefined in it's fourth season...

reply

[deleted]