So all in all, Brad Pitt won an oscar because he's Brad Pitt and he hadn't won one before and this was his window for it.
--
Agreed, but this was his window for it BECAUSE Tarantino had written such a great character for him.
Jack Palance, who won Best Supporting Actor for "City Slickers," said: "The Oscar isn't for the actor...its for the character."
Truer words were never spoken. Some characters are in the title: Forrest Gump. Erin Brockovich. But otherwide, just great characters: Rooster Cogburn, Don Vito Corleone, Atticus Finch. I'm trying to think of some of the female winners, character wise, and I've come up with Liza Minnelli in Cabaret, and Shirley MacLaine in Terms of Endearment.
So...Brad Pitt got a GREAT character here. Cliff Booth, the tough guy who befriends and protects his richer, more spoiled and neurotic TV actor friend Rick Dalton. Cliff Booth, content to live in a small trailer next to a drive-in with his faithful pit bull. Cliff Booth, satisfied with his low-paid life when his richer friend can't stand his. Cliff Booth, man with a mystery: did he kill his wife? Cliff Booth, war hero.
And(in the classic tradition): Cliff Booth, the strong silent hero who can beat up -- and kill if necessary -- all the "bad guys."
The "push" for Brad Pitt here materialized when it was clear what a great character he had to play in this movie. That's from QT's writing. The producers even played it right by pushing Brad for Best Supporting Actor and Leo for Best Actor. A good agreement -- Leo had a good role, too, but no chance at Oscar. Brad, did.
Superstar Pitt here joined Sean Connery, Michael Caine and George Clooney in winning the Best Supporting Actor when he was considered a leading man. Used to be the Best Supporting Actor award went to character guys -- Supporting Actors by trade (Edmond O'Brien, Ed Begley, Sr., Martin Balsam.)
reply
share