Emily Ratajkowski


mmmmmmmmmhmm

reply

Yeah, if you like blown up dolls.
https://vergecampus.com/emily-ratajkowski-cosmetic-surgery-boob-job-nose-lip-injections/

What puzzles me most is that she did nothing for that nasty belly button of hers.

reply

Honestly I think she is way too thin and would probaby look better if she had a bit more weight.

reply

She's just not that hot.

She's the epitome of a lipstick-wearing plain Jane.

There is nothing distinctive or standout about her features or so-called "beauty".

When compared to knockouts from the 80s and 90s, such as Cindy Crawford, Elle McPherson, Claudia Schiffer, Pamela Anderson, and Katy Ireland, Emily Ratajkowski couldn't even hold their g-string.

If the news doesn't put her name next to her photo I would never remember who she is based on how she looks because she's not very indelible despite being photographed all the time.

reply

LOL at the women you chose. Most of them are quirky looking which is why they are models. Pamela Anderson is incredible when she is not wearing her blow up doll makeup.

reply

Most of them are quirky looking which is why they are models.


Quirky yet distinctive, which is the deciding adjective in describing why I still remember the 80s/90s hotties and not Ratajkowski, who is the media's "It" girl for unfathomable reasons, other than being thin and generically symmetrical when it comes to somatic aesthetics.

reply

I think she is beautiful and I agree with Renee that it would be great if we could all experience being that gorgeous for awhile.

reply