MovieChat Forums > Lights Out (2016) Discussion > This movie was horrible

This movie was horrible


And I'm not someone that's usually harsh on the horror genre. Usually films that have a score in the 6's on imdb turn out to not be too bad.

But this was just dumb. All the tension was taken away by the fact that they constantly had light sources.

And what was the most irritating about it is that the movie just makes up the rules as it goes. The ghost can inexplicably turn off lights in certain scenes but she can't turn them off in other scenes.

If it's as simple as turning off a light with her ghostly magic then you think she'd have wasted the brother/sister long ago.

The ghost just conveniently acts stupid when it comes to killing the main characters because the plot demands that they survive. It was painfully obvious how they were dumbing down the monster to keep the main characters alive.

Then when the cops entered the house it was PAINFULLY obvious that the ghost was going to magically switch back to being a pro and of course she wastes them the exact millisecond that the light disappears.

And whats with the ghost being able to magically lock doors from both sides like wtf?

Dumb, predictable movie, and it wasn't scary because they had to bend the rules and intentionally dumb the ghost down given her specific strengths/weaknesses as the evil villain of this movie.

It was an alright idea in theory, but the execution clearly wasn't thought/fleshed out it was incredibly sloppy.

I'm actually shocked that this movie is in the 6's. To me, this is one of those horror movies that deserves to be rated no higher than 4.

Make up your OWN mind. Don't be a follower.
I didn't quite nail it - Christian Bale

reply

Totally agree. They cheated so much in this film. Made me rage. Plus all the characters are so stupid.

reply

Aren't stupid characters the hallmark of every horror film?

reply

Last night I watched this film immediately after The Autopsy of Jane Doe. Despite its flaws, that is a considerably better film and no, the characters in it are not stupid.

reply

Absolutely agree. Watched this with a friend and she was so nonplussed by the predictable 'scares' that she began to doze off about half way in.

The next morning we perused IMDb reviews for what we assumed would be some laughs. To our horror we discovered that almost every review was not only positive, but positively glowing, often with scores of 10/10. Perhaps it is the fact that it was the boring kind of bad that makes it almost no fun to bash? The only really effective sequence was when the little boy when to speak to his mother and she kept referring to "we" and sorta motioning to the darkened doorway as if there was someone there. That gave us both a chill. But that was the only time we weren't laughing.

Anyway, everything you said was accurate, I will just add a few comments:

The editing and pacing was atrocious. In the first five minutes we commented on how jarring the tension-free opening sequence was and how it gave everything away immediately.

Having the original short's star a little cameo was cute, but the feature film wasn't even 5% as successful in terms of tension or humour. Even the pacing of her clicking the light switch was wrong this time around.

We had to laugh when she tried to warn Bella's dad that she saw something in the warehouse but he waves her off because "I have to take this call." but then finishes the call literally THREE SECONDS after she leaves the room. What a dick.

The rest of the film was your standard string of tiresome cliches, including the cliche of cliches, the creepy-little-demon-voiced-girl-in-the-hospital-psych-ward trope, complete with the doctor's audio recordings of their sessions that someone listens to for exposition's sake.

What was that stain on the chair? Are we to believe that they completely atomized a young girl by exposing her to light therapy? Or was her burned body removed? But if she died from exposure to light, why did she come back as a malevolent spirit that is also sensitive to light? What's the point of her being dead in the first place?

Why did she pursue the step-father's assistant at the warehouse? Why did she kill him at the warehouse instead of at the house when her ability to travel is severely limited and entirely dependent on a lack of light? How difficult must have it to been for Diana to travel all the way to the warehouse. Why would she risk her own destruction just to kill him where he works?

While I can see (somewhat) why Diana would want to kill the step-father, why did Diana pursue Rebecca & Martin to Rebecca's apartment? There is no point to this whatsoever other than the needed to pad the film with another location.

Also, why, if Diana was so determined to kill Rebecca, did she take time to chill out and noisily carve her own name into the floor under the carpet? Oh yeah, so that Rebecca could flash back to her childhood. Of course. The childhood drawing cliche. YAWN.

Why did Diana write out a bunch of exposition on the walls of the basement that just happened to be visible in the black light that Martin just happened to stumble upon in the basement only moments earlier?

Why does a regular flashlight suddenly burn holes through Diana's arm when no previous light has harmed her? Previously the presence of light has only limited her movement. I mean, except when it burned her as a kid. Uh.. but why then did the turning on of lights previously only make her vanish, not scream in pain and burn like it did with the flashlight?

Same thing with all that you articulated: why does she turn of the lights one second and not the next? Why can she teleport one moment and not the next? Why are doors etc. in her way one second and not the next? Why is she sometimes harmed by light and other times not?

Besides all of this, the script and acting (perhaps limited by the terrible dialogue) were abysmal. Amateur hour all around. Felt like a lazy cash-grab. Too bad, because the basic idea of a malevolent force whose movement was limited by light could have been developed into something interesting. Instead they took a fun little short and pumped it full of the most obvious plot points and horror conventions and cliches and even then barely managed to pad it out to 80 minutes.




the roman empire never died, it just turned into the catholic church

reply

Yes OP...thank god that there is more people with brains out there...you are so spot on with everything...this is a horrible laughing stock of a movie...atleast for people older than 10 and mentally sane...this is one of the worst and most boring movies ive ever seen in my life...especilly in the horror genre.

~If the realistic details fails, the movie fails~

reply

We see all of the lights in the house go out suddenly and simultaneously. Shortly afterward, we see the boyfriend notice a yard light some distance from the house is also out. Later, when the cops arrive, one of them says " the grid is out . " That usually encompasses a larger area, at least the size of a neighborhood.
If the entity had the capability to do that, why would ordinary houselights even have been such an Achilles heel to begin with?

reply

Just watched it and totally agree. It is a very weak movie. I didn't enjoy it at all.

reply

I noted most of this stuff when watching it and checked the duration when it was mostly revealed as to what it was... about 30 minutes in! From there on it was just a bunch of scares and going back and forth, disappointing overall.

reply