I just saw it!


The entire film is shot and made in a way that makes it look like a one-shot long take. But you can notice that there were lots of cuts because there are like 85% of the actions that were pretty insane, so that would be extremely impossible to shoot one long take.

It was Hardcore Henry type movie that had more actions, only the editing was kinda poorly done. Lots of cheap green screens and CGIs, but doesn't bother me anyway. The actions sequences were actually pretty insane and impressive, IMO. The camerawork is kinda cool, but some people could find it annoying.

Overall, I liked it, it's quite unique.

For those who haven't seen it, here's the trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulPHag30btQ

reply

Holy shit. Between your description and the trailer, I have to check this out. Glad I read your post after reading the other two negative posts. Yeah, it has that dynamism that hardcore henry has, but without a first person pov and clearly, it still looks really cool.

Even if it's more low budget looking, and fake looking, if it does the action well, I should be good with it. I loved Hardcore Henry; can't wait.

reply

Wondered whatever happened to John Woo.

reply

It has some of the most spectacular action scenes ever filmed, but what would it be without the action? This is video game level. Hard to rate.

reply