Nude scene


I wanted to walk out of the theatre after that first scene. That girl Nadine was not necessary in terms of walking around like that completely butt naked. I mean they can show that they had sex without having us see her 10 foot nipple or every hair on her body. I just would like to see a movie with my husband that doesn't have a naked woman in it just for shock value, it lasted too long in my opinion. Am I the only one? I ended up loving the movie regardless, but will just fast forward it when I see it on dvd :)

reply

Actually I thought that girl was a call girl initially, given the total lack of chemistry between the two of them. She had a stunning body though so as a guy I didn't really mind I guess but it did feel too long.

reply

I don't want to say the nudity bothered me but it did seem a little out of place. I actually came into the theater knowing nothing about the movie other than that Denzel was in it and that scene gave me the impression that it was going to be a very different move than what it actually was.

reply

Her bod was hotter then yours

If your hair is on fire, you need to act like your hair is on fire. - Senator Nina Turner

reply

I take it the OP doesn't want her husband seeing or thinking about such women. But trust me, he knows they exist, and may even think of them often. Just look your best and don't worry about it.

That said, the nudity itself was purely for show and really had nothing to do with the plot. But it was an adult kind of movie so...


" Cristal, Beluga, Wolfgang Puck... It's a f#@k house."

reply

The OP's remarks were slightly tongue in cheek.

You bet your sweet ass she has a wandering eye too.


If your hair is on fire, you need to act like your hair is on fire. - Senator Nina Turner

reply

Please learn to spell. Her body was really hot. When you have a nude scene, that's exactly how to do it. Don't tease. Don't have someone with a flat ass or not in shape. She was a 10, hot, shapely, busty, tittie, and beauteous sexy buttocks and thighs. She was a walking sex scene personified, perfection.
Thank you.

reply

You sound like an adolescent twat. Please go make boom boom with your titty magazines and leave the conversing to the grown ups. Cheers.

reply

we all know that a perfect 10 exist, who likes to make out with the mighty pilot, the problem is 95% of women don't look like that, so there is a threat . Even famous actresses use body doubles . I didn't mind looking at Fassbender's junk ,for a long period of time in SHAME. I guess that scene was important, because she was the one saving the kid and the breaking point for Whip ,when he was asked if she took the booze .

reply

Yes! Great scene

reply

Her bod was hotter then yours

That's OK. Her English is better than yours.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

One capital letter per sentence.

reply

I typoed a comma where I meant a period.
What's your excuse jackass.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

What's your excuse jackass?

LOL, idiot.

reply

bod is short for body. it's slang.

reply

I know what bod meant, dumb ass. I was referring to your incorrect use of "then" rather than "than".

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

wow hostility much? and it wasn't even my comment, dumbass.

reply

Doesn't matter that it wasn't your comment.
YOU corrected me "incorrectly"



I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Oh, NOW it doesn't matter. I corrected you just fine; your correction was open to interpretation.

reply

Wrong. I was commenting upon his misuse of then/than.

You jumped into a nearly 2 year old post to explain to me what 'bod' meant, as though I thought that was the mistake.

It is not open to interpretation...
YOU fraked up and corrected me for something that YOU misinterpreted, not me.

So kindly step off now.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Being open for interpretation gave it the possibility of being misinterpreted. I would say that's more the wordsmith's fault, not the reader's. Maybe next time when making such a relevant and unique observation you should be more concise.

Stepping off now. Good day.

reply

asshat.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Why don't you two get a room?

reply

yeah, so archaic to be afraid of the naked form. It's not like she's a surgery'd out pornstar, she's a gorgeous woman. I think they also set it up so we assumed Denzel was with a prostitute or stripper, for the reveal on the plane that she's a flight attendant. With the way the plot worked out, it was a necessary plot device to have Denzel have a relationship with her character. In the end, he came clean because he couldn't stand sullying her character after her death.

What I thought was odd, is that I read this was Denzel's first oscar nom since training day. In training day there was an equally as gratuitous nudity scene with Eva Mendes full frontal in the background of a shot. The shots with nadine were very similar. It seems for Denzel to get nominated he needs to act alongside a gorgeous latina actress who gets nude in background shots

reply

[deleted]

because that's how the scene treated her. they gave her no importance or introduction, which is how a paid sex worker is treated. it could've been a fat woman and people would have thought the same.

reply

because what else are women in movies for...?

Hello seestra, nice to see you again.

reply

Because you are American watching American movies? Start watching European movies and you will see nudity of real people without L-shaped blankets, it's always amusing how Americans show sex in movies without nudity and especially after sex scenes, because God forbid seeing such unnatural thing as woman breast.

Btw. that scene was extremely cold, emotionless, which could hint she is pro doing just her job.

The best - Fight Club, American Beauty & Falling Down.

reply

Entertaining thread.

reply

I know it's been eight years, but I'm curious what "L-shaped blankets" refers to in the context of PeterMarkoff's post.

reply

I almost think she wasn't supposed to be in it that long or that clearly but that the cameraman was so distracted by her that she ended up in the shot...

but seriously, the only thing that shot did was remind me that I don't look like that and made me thankful my hubby wasn't there to see it too...



Effort only fully releases its reward after a person refuses to quit. -Napoleon Hill



reply

This was one of the most blatantly gratuitous nude scenes I've ever seen. And opening with it was an obvious play to the most prurient instincts of males.

And that is why I loved it!

I'm sorry -- no I'm not -- the only thing hotter about this gal walking around nude was when she put on her thong!

There are some things that will NEVER change in our evolving world of human sexuality, and this scene surely pinpointed one of them.

And legalpumpkin, no one, not even your husband expects you to live up to the physical beauty of the young girl in this scene.

Most men can never live up to the sexuality of Denzel, even in his drunked up, outta shape body.

But the visuals of this woman are striking, and invigorating. I won't ever delete them from my memory bank. That's just the way it is.

reply

Wake up OP. It's rated "R" for a reason and it's not because they say damn a couple of times. You'll have to do a little research before going in especially with R movies. Even with an A list cast, you never know what direction it's going to go.

reply

"R" rating could mean a lot of things...language, violence, graphic content, "partial" nudity.

reply

"R" rating could mean a lot of things...language, violence, graphic content, "partial" nudity.


Sure. But more often than not, they tell you why it got the rating it did right on the poster. So it's not really a mystery.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/--7xzW9YVu_0/UG2buOxXb0I/AAAAAAAARcY/udLi6tNx b8M/s1600/flight-poster.jpg


http://www.paramount.com/flight/images/localized/rating.png

And there are always movie sites that tell you why it got the rating it did.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1907668/parentalguide

So it's really no secret.




Every party has a pooper.

reply

I wish they would make more movies where at least one of the major female characters is naked all the time, like Lifeforce.

reply

Lifeforce great underrated vampire/zombie movie of the early 80s- I thought I was the only one.

reply

Lifeforce is a masterpiece. Curiously, it's directed by Tobe Hooper, a Spielberg alumn just like Zemeckis.

Approved!

Javier H. Moreno
www.cacaorock.com

reply

thanks cbartal !

Effort only fully releases its reward after a person refuses to quit. -Napoleon Hill



reply

The opening scene was awesome, much of which is due to the ffn shot of such a ridiculously hot woman. Shortly after that there is a plane crash. After that pretty much NOTHING goes on. For over another two hours. Seriously, NOTHING. John Goodman is cool, they should have made the movie about him.

reply

That was Ruxins wife from The League! awesome, stunning and a true beauty

reply

Nice! Couldn't agree more....

reply

Her body was stunning, however the scene would have been better if we knew she was a phuc buddy & not just an escort.
No need to cut anything out or take the camera off her, just to have used the time more wisely to "connect" the two of them.

Not all women are threatened by one another, we also discriminate, we also judge friends by their hotness/worth to be in our circle, to maintain or increase our collective real estate or cred..as it were.

Judging from many responses here, it's as if hot girls don't hang w/hot girls, not true, and for the record we're more concerned about the hottie upstairs or @ Bucks, than a film actress.

reply


She WAS a *beep* buddy. She was a flight attendant on the same flight as Denzel, who winds up dead during the flight.
Hama cheez ba-Beer behtar meshawad!

reply

@zoltan-jose
no *beep* Sherlock..I got that, my point was, the scene could've have played more into it.

reply

*beep* hell, son - you're dumb! There is absolutely nothing in your original comment that makes it appear that you did understand that she was his *beep*-buddy. And in case you haven't had any experience with real women, that was one of the most natural scenes of a normal *beep*-buddy that I have seen on screen. That is how real people behave.

Hama cheez ba-Beer behtar meshawad!

reply

zoltan-jose...and this will be the last post I respond to. If you could read instead of busy being a phucing bell-end, you would know you're wrong.

reply


You want to be a prude, go on ahead and be one, son. Don't call people bell-ends if you are not comfortable with women walking around nude.
Hama cheez ba-Beer behtar meshawad!

reply

Old post, but I knew on first reading exactly what he was talking about. No need to insult people just because you can't parse simple English.

reply

she wasn't an escort; she was one of the flight attendants.

reply

[deleted]

I was, too, relieved that I went to see the movie on my own, without my man :) I mean, sure, he thinks I'm the most beautiful woman in the world, but I would be SO self-conscious if I was watching that scene with him :)

And, oh yeah, I absolutely loved her body. What a beautiful creature.

Avoid reality at all costs.

reply

I'd bang Nadine Velazquez - doggy style, all night long for one whole weekend. And then I'd move on. Women who have her physique are real women. No one wants to *beep* someone who looks like a bag of lard with two holes.

Hama cheez ba-Beer behtar meshawad!

reply

I agree, I thought this movie was pandering to slobs, the kind of slobs that will be provoked to do stupid things because it turned out right for Denzel.

Although, she was a beautiful girl. Who are these people that do stuff like this ... do they exist and are they anything like movie stars ... I think not.

I was hoping for much more than just a semi-hypocritical morality AA tale. I really though that cutting to the heart of the issue of people of great talent but who have human failings was undercut by the proportions of Washington's ugliness - and especially the scene at the end.

Movies have an effect on people, and I think this could have been positive, but it was not.

reply

That scene, especially as the first scene in the movie did seem gratuitous.

reply

such a beautiful creature with so much insecurities that she needed drugs and alcohol, maybe the scene was so long to make us aware that even perfect 10 are not so perfect inside

reply

I agree that movies have an effect on people, and that Hollywood has a responsibility to watch what it puts out. But I do think this movie was positive ultimately.

I don't get the "semi-hypocritical" part, but Washington's character was just a guy dealing with, or not dealing with alcoholism under unusual circumstances. That was the heart of the issue, and I don't think it was meant to be more complex than that. I doubt there could have been a more positive ending than him coming clean with his addictions and making amends with the people in his life... I would add that this movie might actually encourage people to reflect on certain things within their own lives, and that's pretty positive in it's own right.



" Cristal, Beluga, Wolfgang Puck... It's a f#@k house."

reply

I don't think a movie has any responsibility to put out a positive message, or any message.

It's all free speech, and as long as it passes the Supreme Court test of not yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater, it's fine.

reply

Free speech nothing, it's not even about that. It's about recognizing when you hold wide influence - which the movie industry does, and acknowledging that you have a responsibility to do something with it, whether it's law or not. The rating system is a form of responsibility, although sometimes more of a joke.

Anyone in a position of influence who thinks they have no responsibility to the greater public is an idiot.


" Cristal, Beluga, Wolfgang Puck... It's a f#@k house."

reply

Maybe their sense of responsibility in this film drove them to make and put out that scene.

What does responsibility mean to you LateNightCable? Does it mean that they had to conform to your idea of responsibility?

If you'd made a movie, should you have conformed to the Flight creator's sense of responsibility? Should they have been able to force you to put a nude scene in the opening of your movie?

This whole idea of "responsibility" is personal and subjective.

If I tell you that your last 3 posts are irresponsible, will you delete them based on my analysis?

reply

[deleted]

Another sexually frustrated stunted in adolescence moron. If you were nice to girls you would not have this frustration and hostility and think that everything and everyone is just like you. Maslow talked about getting needs met, and how you get stuck at a certain point in life when you do not get what you need. Maybe you need a shrink, but since I cannot charge you for my consultation I'll just put you on ignore so you can think about why you are so stuck and how you might need to modify your behavior to be happier.

reply

You're missing the point entirely about responsibility. It's not about forcing personal views on anyone, but about acknowledging a responsibility, and acting on it period.

If you're a producer who releases a movie that incites panic, or glorifies elements of life that could have an ill effect on a gullible society, that may not be the most responsible thing. Reality tv is often very exploitative, and probably offers nothing of value to society. Not much getting around that. On the other hand, why wouldn't you want to be responsible for a project that may actually do some good?

It comes down to taking advantage of one's position of influence, and using it or not using in a productive fashion. That said, I am not accusing the makers of Flight of irresponsibility. I liked the movie a lot. And think it could actually serve to help certain people examine themselves if they watched it.

reply

You're missing the point entirely about responsibility. It's not about forcing personal views on anyone, but about acknowledging a responsibility, and acting on it period.


Except that is the definition of forcing your personal views on someone. You are forcing your own sense or idea of responsibility onto story tellers. Because you believe that if someone wants to tell a story that doesn't fit into what you consider to be "healthy" for society then they have a responsibility to think twice about it, not do it, or edit it to make it more palatable. We have a word for that, it's called "censorship." We also have an amendment in the constitution that deals with that.

I get it, you didn't like the way it went down in it's entirety. To be honest, neither did I (ha despite my defense of this film.) I would have preferred it if he had just gotten away with it. Because it shocks the conscious and sometimes that's fun. But they wanted a moral story about downfall and redemption so that's the one they told and they told it well. I can't begrudge them that. I don't have the right.

...we got NUKES, knives... sharp sticks-

reply

No, that is not the definition of what I'm talking about. You're talking about force and rights, I'm talking about using one's free will to either promote ill, or wellness. I guess it's something you either grasp or just don't, but I look at it from both angles. I don't like censorship for the purpose of undo gain, or the suppression of information that would serve people well to be aware of. At the same time, society is a sponge, and will soak up anything that is fed to it, and then reflect it. Your individual beliefs on rights, or mine do not come into the equation. Because in life, we're here to either promote human elevation, or feed into the negative. It's that simple... I would have liked the movie either way, but I like the way it did play out.




" Cristal, Beluga, Wolfgang Puck... It's a f#@k house."

reply

Fair enough.

But I don't think promoting your preference as something someone else should have done is a promotion of free will at all. I believe it's an artist's prerogative to tell the story they want to tell in the manner they want to tell it. If that means exposing people to things they may not be comfortable with, (whether they should or should not be comfortable with it, I guess, is irrelevant...) then that is what that person should do. I don't support defaulting on story integrity to appease the sensibilities of the moral self righteous.

Just because you word it to the effect that people should exercise their free will to do what is right, what you are in effect saying is people should exercise their free will to do what I think is right. Morality and righteousness have been and continue to be highly subjective. There are many things that we can agree on that are right and wrong and most of those deal with invasion of some kind (ie privacy, home, self.) But when it comes to things like nudity in movies there is absolutely not a clear definition of where the line should be or if there even should be one.

And even with that said, there's still the rating system which is now compounded with a brief description of WHY a movie is rated the way it is. It's a compromise, this way people can decide for themselves whether they want to be "assaulted" by vulgarity or nudity. But it is ridiculous to go into a movie with mature themes and then complain about the mature themes contained therein.

That's just my perspective on it...

I get your point. Though I think you are a little too black and white about it. Somehow I feel like your argument boils down to nudity in movies "feeds into the negative" and "promotes ill." Which I vehemently disagree with.

...we got NUKES, knives... sharp sticks-

reply

I think you may have mistaken me for someone else. I've never voiced an objection to the nudity in the movie. I like seeing t&a as much as the next person, and that content is to be expected today in a movie rated R. The context of the nudity would dictate whether or not it's negative anyway.

I'm an artist myself, so I'm all for creative freedom. But glamorization of disfunction for profit is a huge business today, because people love drama, cheap thrills, and laughing at the misfortunes of others... And therefore giving it to them is very profitable. Reality TV is a prime example of how that has been made all too easy to do, and I would think it very hard to make a case for it's moral value. Would I welcome a ban on entertainment I personally find degenerate? Certainly. But I don't suggest the complete censorship of anything really, but rather strict regulation of when and where questionable content may be shown, and the amount. Especially in regards to television, which while rated for content, is still highly accessible to everyone young and old.

When 9/10's of a basic networks lineup consists of shows filled with characters you wouldn't want your own family emulating, it's fair to say there may be a morality issue with that programming. And likely very little creativity of benefit to defend the merits of either. If we are what we eat, which is true, then America most certainly is what it chooses to entertain itself with. Or rather has chosen for them by television executives who don't care what you're kids see, then has transmitted to homes all over the nation and around the world.




" Cristal, Beluga, Wolfgang Puck... It's a f#@k house."

reply

Oh, you might be right. Sorry for that then.

Okay, after a little clarification it looks like we largely agree. In fact I don't think I disagree with anything you just said...

I would certainly not miss reality television as we know it [I think most of it is staged these days anyway] if it were to suddenly go completely out of style and go away forever. Though I don't think they contribute as much to the downfall of society, seeing as how those people were always going to exit whether reality TV existed or not. Now, we just have to hear about it all the time...

...we got NUKES, knives... sharp sticks-

reply

So what. You're free to be a jerk too, but it does not make the world a better place, and over time makes more people behave like jerks to the point that things fall apart. The idea of society is based on people deciding not to be jerks for the most part, so if we see movies that portray jerks all the time it does have an effect - look at you. So, just because it seems unreasonable and impossible to actually define what is going to have what effect we do not and cannot legislate it, but your libertarian jerk ideas do not sustain a civilization and you can see the decline of America on many dimensions prove that.

Feel free to reply, but directly after this you go on my jerk/ignore list.

reply

Boobs make you aggressive? Someone wasn't breast fed! And probably dropped as a baby

Captain Whitaker's arc ended with a moral to the story. How are you still bothered by a pair of breasts?

If your hair is on fire, you need to act like your hair is on fire. - Senator Nina Turner

reply

I think you just proved my point while trying to sound smart and pissed. The world has really made you a jerk, to the point where you don't even care.

reply

because it turned out right for Denzel.


How did it turn out right for Captain Whitaker? Or in your weird mind did you think the person Denzel Washington really end up in jail?

How is letting yourself do time turning out right?

Your opinion doesn't make any sense

If your hair is on fire, you need to act like your hair is on fire. - Senator Nina Turner

reply

[deleted]

The nude scene was fine, although it seemed rather dark on the screen in the theater where I saw it--was that true for everyone? I did have a concern, however, about the film's postulating that cocaine can help sober you up.

reply

I did have a concern, however, about the film's postulating that cocaine can help sober you up.

Apparently you've never tried it then.

reply

In mainstream films now a days, were seeing full frontals. I'm waiting for full frontals with a brazilian wax job. When will that day come?

reply

[deleted]

Ba, That's already been done. Look up an old Corey Haim movie called "Just One of the Girls" and check out the second girl you see in the full frontal locker room scene. What's funny is that the scene is totally out of place in an otherwise squeaky clean Canadian teen movie.

reply

[deleted]

Don't feel anything is wrong with it, but make it realistic at least. We're to believe these two have been sexing and snorting all night long? Right? No. The alarm goes off or the phone rings and she gets out of bed and doesn't do what every human body needs to. Now had they done that, then have her sort through the clothing while he talked and put her butt crack and junk in his face,
^Exactly.

reply

[deleted]

I hare brazilians. Also bushes. Two landing strips are good for me and would be appropriate for this movie.

reply

You really need a "Brazilian"? Ugh, let's just take away any of the personality "down there" away... NOOOO thanks. She isn't pre-pubescent girl, she *should* have *something* going on down there, anything other than completely out of control... What *is* funny is the same actress in "The League", her husband on the show freaked out when she went from a "pizza slice to a bread stick". LOL!

reply

What is the problem here? People are nude sometimes. Sometimes they are nude in the morning getting ready for a flight. Sometimes nude people are incredibly hot women. Sometimes they get a little fd-up and mix up with their coworkers. Sometimes these women are black, sometimes they are white, sometimes they are hispanic. Sometimes there coworkers are pilots, Sometimes the pilots are drunks, drug addicts. Sometimes the fd-up coworkers are white. Sometimes they are white. Sometimes they are hispanic. In this movie, the hot girl was nude, there were drugs, there were schedules were to be met. There were challenges, there were outcomes, there were consequences. Every work of art needs to set it's own benchmarks. Is there a straight line rule that defines the structure of art? The movie could've been made without the nudity. It could've been made without the swearing. It cou;d've been made without the plane crash also.

reply

Apparently vaginas disgust some people so they'd rather look at a bunch of hair.

Newsflash... you can get the same effect by looking at a girl's head.

reply

Imagine working in a movie theater & going into the movie knowing nothing about the movie & seeing a completely naked (not just boobs & butt, but the whole shebang) woman on screen for at least 2 min. with at least 130 people watching the same thing...that's like 131 people watching a porn together...wasn't comfortable at all. :/

reply

I agree with that. It was gratuitous and imposing.

What is the point of showing a movie where a guy, one of the biggest movie starts does everything wrong, gets a lot of laughs, really overdoes it, breaks all the rules, and then at the last minute says, I'm sorry. You are spending most of the movie watching really crappy behavior being modeled, but the thing is does this really begin to show the reality of drug addiction. The movie was so unrealistic thinking back on it, that someone so messed up would really not have been able to land a plane like that in reality - only in movies. In other words it feeds into the idiot viewers stupid fantasies that they really do not have to do anything to change their lives because they are really in control and can say sorry later with no penalty.

I was really hoping for something better with this movie. I liked the idea that the guy had a little alcohol in his bloodstream but that the authorities were going to persecute him for it. That would have made an interesting and balanced story, but like most Hollywood movies, and almost all Denzel Washington movies they have to take it way up over the top to the point of idiocy, and to distract the idiots from seeing how bad the movie is they jiggle some titties in front of them.

And then look what you get in the commentary on most of these movies ... Amazon message boards are just about as big a disgrace from the brainless people who post here for the most part ... that have to annoy and hector anyone that has anything to say that makes them realize in the least bit how stupid and empty they are.

OK ... done.

reply

What is the point of showing a movie where a guy, one of the biggest movie starts does everything wrong,


Anyways the point in showing a movie that starts like that IS CALLED THE BEGINNING OF THE CHARACTER ARC.

First the audience sees the world the character is in, its a baseline, and through conflict and rising action, we see the protagonist slowly overcome and change, till at the very end, the protagonists world is different from how it began. Resolution is Captain Whitaker decides to stop the lies and take some of the blame, and get clean. Fix himself, fix his relationship with his family.

Anyways, so in character arcs, its all about contrast and conflict, and resolution. Captain Whitaker's arc ended with him being a changed person.

Its quite clear how he got there and the plot rang true that addiction isn't something you fix in Act One. It's a disease.

So all those gratuitous scenes with drugs and alcohol, and Man VS Self and Man VS Society themes, drove the plot to the end of the arc.

So Captain Whitaker had to go through some lows, thats how drama works lol. The film's genre is Drama, or wasn't that clear to you?

Film 101 stuff

If your hair is on fire, you need to act like your hair is on fire. - Senator Nina Turner

reply

The point is they thought it was an interesting story. If you want stupid and empty how about complaining about the people who told or enjoyed a story that you did not enjoy just because it clashes with your personal sensibilities. You are the definition of false tolerance. Looking down on anyone who doesn't think like you do but pretending to promote a better ideal.

Maybe if you could see further than the end of your own face you'd know that life doesn't conform to your idea of it. People pull off amazing things drunk or sober, sometimes they are just stupid lucky, sometimes they relapse into muscle memory. That is how someone who has been driving for decades can be near black out drunk and still operate a car and even survive dangerous traffic situations, while at the same time someone else can experience the same thing and be killed instantly.

And while your at it maybe you can do something for your comprehension. Things did NOT turn out alright for Captain Whip. He lost the last bit of anything he had that meant anything to him, his ability to fly. AND he's in jail. Just because he sobered up and had a positive outlook for the first time in his life doesn't mean he rode off into the sunset.

The air must be thin up there on that horse.

...we got NUKES, knives... sharp sticks-

reply

You think simply seeing a naked women for 2 mins equals a porn???? i'm just glad your not in charge of famous paintings that feature nude women and men.

"The People Of America Have Spoken THE REAL TITLE TOWN U.S.A IS VALDOSTA GEORGIA"

reply

I agree with scottieweiss.

If the scene had a close up of the time on the clock then a big penis came into view they'd be complaining just as much as women. It's typical of sex scenes today where the guy is covered instead of just a topless actress, which was bad enough, now it's full frontal nudity and prolonged scenes of it. If the actress is naked then why not the actor?

Had I seen this in the cinema I would have walked out.

To say women feel it's a threat, well I thought she looked too skinny with a pair of silicone bags swinging from her armpits. Her face looks a bit too masculine, is that because the actress is a bit gaunt? Putting on a bit of weight would help with that but actresses feel they have to be size zero or close to it.

I thought the rest of the film wasn't really that good but great supporting cast especially Don Cheadle and Bruce Greenwood. So stick gratuitous explicit female nudity to compensate for not that great a script. Also there were no strong major female leads. I didn't think this was Washington's best acting at all. John Goodman was himself probably exaggerated!

All in all a disappointment.

reply

No one said it was the end of the world did they. You are the one that is overreacting.

...And you think you're so clever and classless and free, but you're just *beep* peasants as far as I can see. J. Lennon.

reply

[deleted]