Hated the father


I'm sorry, i know he wanted the girls back, but what a douche, i always hate when the parents try to put the blame on the cops and so on...

Bring me a dream Burke,bring me a dream!

reply

It's realistic.

reply

I questioned Dover's behavior over time. Why did he never stop to wonder what kind of person would take the kind of punishment and torture he was handing out, and still say nothing? Except someone who could not say anything?

I know Dover was supposed to be out of his mind with fear and rage, but seriously. He almost killed the boy and still Alex doesn't even deny what Dover accuses him of? He's clearly impaired, and all three of them should have seen that. It's not enough that they were supposed to be grief stricken, terrified parents.

I thought it was a case of a writer making happen what he needs to happen, and not organic to how people really think and behave. On the other hand, the entire kidnapping and torture was contrived.

reply

You are wrong Paul Dano's character said "They cried when I left them" and then after all of the torturing he finally gives up and tells Hugh Jackman's character exactly where they were. That's why he goes to the old ladies house and puts him in the hole. So no he was not innocent at all.

reply

Did you not pay attention at all? He had every reason to believe that he was clearly involved. Keller just acted rashly, and had no idea how to back out of kidnapping someone himself.

reply

I'm sorry, i know he wanted the girls back, but what a douche, i always hate when the parents try to put the blame on the cops and so on...

Are you for real? Loki was trailing him and, finally Keller noticed outside the liquor store. What brilliant question did Loki ask at that time? "Why do you have lye in your basement?"

"I offered him a lateral move to Austin." "That's like a duck making a lateral move to a l'Orange!"

reply

Your point? Loki solved the case and saved the girl right? Like he saif he would do, and yes i am for real, and i have the right to express my opinion, Loki don't know everything like us the viewers, so he don't know if the parents are involved, and lye can be used to dispose of dead bodies.

Bring me a dream Burke,bring me a dream!

reply

The only reason he was at the house and found the girl is because he found the guy the father had kidnapped.

The only reason it was solved was due to the father.

reply

Correct :)

reply

Yes... the father and the near-death beating and burning of a man with learning difficulties. Sorry but the father is kind of terrible. The case was solved sure but at what cost?

reply

The "cost" was nothing compared to the alternative.

reply

You can say that in hindsight. Let's not forget that this is a movie where characters wear "plot armour. What if he didn't find her?

Also, I'd like to point out that he didn't find her through the torture. One of the girls escaped on her own and she gave a hint "you were there, too". She could have said the same to the cop. So, yes, technically he found her/the location but it was due to luck and definately not due to his torture.

reply

The question was posed in hindsight.

And, no. He would have never have went there with the torture, so she never would have said that to him. Also, they were under the car when the cops were there, so no, she couldn't have said that to them.

reply

The question was posed in hindsight, but shouldn't you judge somebody by the time he makes his decision? If I drive a car while I am drunk but was lucky and hurt nobody, was I right to do so or did I do something wrong?
Likewise, let's say there two different people in a similar setup like the father in this story. They both make the same decision to torture that mentally handicapped person. But only one of them gets the ending like in this movie. The other one is less lucky and that girl isn't able to escape on her own. The girls are never found. Would you now say the one father was right and the other wasn't, basing on the outcome? How? Both did the exact same thing, either it is morally okay to act like this or it doesn't.

And, no. He would have never have went there with the torture, so she never would have said that to him. Also, they were under the car when the cops were there, so no, she couldn't have said that to them.

What I meant is this: The girl was aware that both the father and the cop have been talking with the "aunt". She managed to escape. The father was the first one speaking to her. She said to him "you were there, too" which tipped him off. But she could as well have talked to the cop first and said "you were there, too" and then the cop would have found her earlier. And in that case the father would have accomplished nothing with his actions and - according to your own logic above - would be in the wrong.

Anyway, they were only able to find the second girl because the first one escaped all by herself. The torture accomplished zilch in all of this. In fact it detracted the cop. The father was constantly complaining that the cop was wasting time following him. Well, if he didn't kidnap Alex, the cop would have no reason to waste that time.

reply

I wasn't making a judgment on the father or morals. That wasn't the question that was posed.

reply

kind of terrible.



Kind of terrible? He was terrible. I had no sympathy for him, even when he was in that hole. Though I did want him to be found....so he could go to prison.

reply

Which means the cop was right in following the father in the first place ...
... please let's not forget a crucial thing here:

In the end, nobody really found them, one of the girls escaped all by herself! And that girl gave the father the hint "you were there, too" so he knew where to look. However, she could have said the same to the cop. In either case, the torture did NOT free the girls!

And, as I said further down in this thread, this is still a movie where things like these happen because it's a movie. You can say "the father somewhat solved this" in hindsight. But if this was a real situation where you don't have hollywood writers backing you up that you know will write an ending where the girls are released, would you still cast the same verdict?

reply

Wow, glad Im not YOUR kid. Would you just give up searching after 90 minutes?

reply

No i wouldn't but i certainly would not blame the police officer, if he were smart, but no, he was a hot head, he tortured the wrong person because he tough he was right and that he had the right to do what he did, but nevermind you are right, you know everything right?




Bring me a dream Burke,bring me a dream!

reply

Uh, was Alex really the "wrong person"? I was pretty sure he was in on it with his aunt. He definitely said as much to the dad in the parking lot altercation, remember? Even if that was a red herring I don't see how he could not have known the girls were being held captive in the same home he was living in. Mentally disabled, sure, but innocent, no.

What a lovely way to burn...

reply

No, but he was kidnapped by her and her husband, he was mentally ill, so he was a victim too and besides all the torute led to nowhere, and i know that what happened was to make the movie rolling, i'n just saying, this father in particular didn't get my simpathy

Bring me a dream Burke,bring me a dream!

reply

Led to nowhere?
It started a chain that finally led to Anna.
No tortured Alex = no saved Anna. Probably.
There are ofc possibilities of other ways but the way they showed was the way in that Alex had to be tortured by Keller.

Alex mumbled the word maze, Keller not knowing what this meant, went to Holly (his mom/aunt whatever) to bring it in a conversation in a subtile way.
Which was fruitless. Until Joy (the other child) could flee and said, in the hospital, that shes seen Keller.
Keller got it quite quickly where she could have seen him and rushed to Hollys house. Got captured himself.

Everything he does doesnt bring direct results but leads to a progess nevertheless.

Det. Loki found imprisoned Alex which then led him to Holly too and finally to the rescue of Anna... and its to assume he even discovered the captured Keller at the end.

Without torturing Alex none of this would have happened.


Not that I sympathize with Kellers doing but it brought his baby back alive.
And he didnt start it out of the blue. The words Alex said to him while the parking lot fight convinced him (and me).

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

so basically you are saying, that the torture wasn't necessary. Because Joy did excape because Holly felt lonely and took the girls into the house.

Keller was already convinced, even before Alex said anything. And he wasn't knowingly in on the kidnapping. He himself was kidnapped, drugged and abused for a long time and living in his own world, he doesn't even get what is happening.

reply

A retard isn't completely dumb.He said he was with her and she (or they) didn't cry until he left. Its about her whereabouts and he knew where she is. Period.

so basically you are saying, that the torture wasn't necessary. Because Joy did excape because Holly felt lonely and took the girls into the house.
Eh? ---Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

If he would have abducted Alex and played monopoly with him Joy still would have been able to escape. It was all due to the fact that Holly felt lonely and took the girls out of the hole into her house.
Just saying that torturing Alex was wrong. But basically torturing itself is wrong

reply

She put the girls into the hole because the police questioned her. They were in the house before. Where Alex played with them or whatever he did.

Whether Alex would have mumbled the word maze while playing monopoly is doubtful. He did so because he was under great stress. In the hot/cold shower.
That word triggered that Keller went to Holly (where Joy saw him).

But basically torturing itself is wrong

That goes without saying.

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

Though I vastly agree that torturing is wrong, there are situations where information has been obtained by using it (Guantanamo anyone?) And I would do the same thing in his situation.

"I do not like mixing up moralities and mathematics."
Churchill

reply

The guy lifted a small dog up by its lead, choking the poor thing. God knows what other acts of cruelty he’d performed. A few rounds of scalding hot water evened the score.

reply

but innocent, no.


Actually innocent, yes. Absolutely yes.
He was abducted as a child and abused for years, to the point he could barely function. He most certainly was not 'in on it.' He was a victim, just as the girl were - more actually. Keller's actions were indefensible. He was a sadistic psychopathic creep.

reply

He seemed in on it to me, as in he knew what was going on. I don't excuse his actions because he was abused as well. You're welcome to.

What a lovely way to burn...

reply

You, obviously are not a parent. I don't know if I'd be capable to do what Keller did (and I hope I'll never find out) but I can completely understand his actions. We are talking about two little girls been kidnapped here, and so they mentioned in the movie the chances to find them alive are dramatically reduced with every day that pass.

To Keller's eyes the police wasn't doing their job, I mean they just release the main suspect and then he goes and said "They only cried when I left them". Why would an innocent person say that? Nevermind his mental illness. He Knew and did something. And then he sings that song that the girls sang early that day of the kidnapped. With all this information, and the police (to your eyes) are doing nothing what would you do? Just sit in your ** and wait to somebody find your little girl dead body?

Keller didn't know about Alex/Barry past, he knew that he was the key to find his daughter, so he try to take that information from him by torture. On my opinion the smart thing would it be to put in surveillance on Alex, in order to find out the girls location first. But that will imply to wait meanwhile the girls are still being.. I don't even wanna imagine what the old hag was doing to them.

If the surveillance went to nothing, then confront him and torture him or whatever. I am not saying that is ok to do that but I can understand what drag him to that point.

I'm more interesthing to discuss why isn't the FBI involved in the investigation? I thought the kidnap cases corresponded them to investigate. Why there weren't any psychiatrist during the interrogation? And no budget for surveillance? really? I am not american so please excuse my english and my ignorance in this matter.

reply

Torture is NEVER justifiable or forgiveable.
I would hope you teach that basic moral to your children.

I absolutely loved this film, but the sadistic Keller was a sinister character. Are you meant to like him? Or root for him? I would say NO. But it's not for me to decide.

Do I need to produce children to have a valid opinion on the morality of torture?
Absolutely not.

reply

That's your opinion. You're clearly the type of person who would prefer to see a guilty terrorist have the right to remain silent rather than give up details of a plot that would result in the deaths of hundreds, thousands, even millions of people.

Most people would agree that torture is ALWAYS justifiable if there's a chance, no matter how slim, that engaging in such an act would potentially save lives.

Please, do the world a favor and do not procreate. Birth control was created with the likes of you in mind. The last thing this world needs are more sick, twisted people like you who bleed their hearts out for the sadistic child molesters and rapists who prey upon children.

reply

What a deranged loser. It's obvious that all you really crave is attention - but know you won't get anymore from me.

You're clearly the type of person who would prefer to see a guilty terrorist have the right to remain silent rather than give up details of a plot that would result in the deaths of hundreds, thousands, even millions of people.


Seriously? ... Grow up please. Or just continue making your pathetic straw man arguments, like an ignorant child. Nobody really cares either way.

reply

There goes the saying: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt."

I think that fits perfectly with you, don't you?

reply

So if my child was kidnapped and you happened to leave the area and then later said something that I took the wrong way, you would be a-okay for me to kidnap and torture you to potential death? Because that's all I would be working on and it was all Keller was working on.

reply

To Keller's eyes the police wasn't doing their job, I mean they just release the main suspect and then he goes and said "They only cried when I left them". Why would an innocent person say that? Nevermind his mental illness. He knew and did something.

--?---------------------

Yes, he knew. I think those words were meant to comfort Keller, that the girls weren't in distress. I think he then shut down and couldn't say any more out of sheer terror. If you'll remember, the kidnapper woman told Keller that Alex used to talk up a storm before his accident, but then he got more selective with words. I think we are to understand in hindsight that she and her husband caused the accident after Alex talked too much for their comfort, and ensured he would never do it again for fear of another accident. I think Alex is a victim through and through, and will never recover from this new torture. Nightmares nightly for the rest of his life.

It's a brilliant film, one that brings up the question of how far can we justify ourselves going in order to protect our own family.

reply

Ethereal Elements: No one has a 'right' to torture another human being the way he did. No one.


To Keller's eyes the police wasn't doing their job, I mean they just release the main suspect and then he goes and said "They only cried when I left them". Why would an innocent person say that? Nevermind his mental illness. He knew and did something.


That doesn't change what Ethereal Elements says one iota. Nobody has the right to do that to any other human being. Period.

The fact that Keller Dover was a devout Christian only made that clearer. Instead of putting his trust in Jesus, the guy felt the need to become a kidnapper and torturer (and murderer; Dover was never going to let Alex out of that torture chamber, even if he had told where the girls were.)

So much for Christianity.

reply

Well-thought out observations!

Also, Keller saw Alex singing the kids song that the girls sang ... then saw him torture his dog. How does one who already has budding suspicions react to that?


Actually, if one goes back to the interview with Alex's real mother, she did say that he was last seen playing near an RV that was often parked nearby when he disappeared as a little boy. It was the faux-parents/murderers who were in that RV ( an admission by the old woman that during summers they would drive in an RV of sorts which she told Keller during his first visit).

This is a very convoluted thriller -- but to me what stood out is how emotionally the principal characters were dealing with the situation.

*Keller was emotionally overwrought and seemed to be driven to do anything to find his daughter. He was always someone who wanted to be in control everytime (e.g., his survivalist basement) and when something happened that was beyond his control, he reacted in the primordial way that a man like him would react. Not saying that most men would resort to torture, but it was easy to understand why he would behave like that. If you were the daughter, when you grow up and find out what he tried to do for you -- how would you react ?


*Loki was supposed to be the cool detective, but perhaps he needed to have a deeper understanding of human nature ( like anticipating that an overwrought father of a kidnapped child might react in the most violent way if he is not seeing any indications that his child could be found...and alive). He seemed to have also reacted too negatively to the man who had actually been kidnapped by the couple years ago, too. Maybe he could have recognized the mental issues early on...and maybe that suicide would have been prevented? He probably could have put two and two together much faster had he paid more attention to the clues ( e.g., why had a priest been driven to kill someone if that someone had not been truly evil?, the clue of the RV mentioned by the real mother of Alex in their first interview, what Keller told him about Alex's statement about "seeing them happy when he left them", etc.)... At the end, I think Loki seemed to have become more chastened...and maybe if and when he found Keller underground, he might even explain the mitigating circumstances if ever there is a trial for assault and battery.


*The old woman was a real murderous mental case, maybe even more so than the dead husband. She continued on her kidnapping and killing rampage even after her hushand disappeared. She even intimidated Alex into supporting her statements to he police. She was just a cold-blooded killer driven with an undying rage against fate! Maybe Loki and his police department could have launched a wider search on her background? What happened to the husband? How did she support herself? Have other kids in the area been kidnapped before Anna and Joy disappeared? Where did the Old Woman and Alex lived during those times?


*The neighbors ( Terence Howard and Viola Davis characters) were also emotionally distraught by what happened to their daughter Joy. Did Loki also investigate them as thoroughly as he did Keller? In their place, would you have sanctioned what Keller did or would you have reported him to the police? Who knows what else they would have done if Joy had not turned up early?


I think this is not a straightforward thriller. It cannot also expect to have unanimity in the emotional reaction of the audience to how the parents were reacting to the situation. It is really more of a psychological thriller and makes the audience emotionally invested in the story and the characters.




reply

Alex's abduction/torture can only explain how a normal possibly kindhearted kid can be turned into a sadistic child kidnapper. Still, wouldn't change the fact that he's one.

reply

Long time since I watched this so I could be wrong - but I wouldn't call him "sadistic." When did he show obvious pleasure in that situation? Maybe when he choked the dog I guess, but even then he seemed more confused than sadistic.

Anyway - in terms of guilt or innocence (which is what I commented on) then his past experiences could absolutely prove innocence - like diminished responsibility.

reply

"When did he shpw obvious pleasure in that situation?"

But when did Jackman display this same "obvious pleasure" in torturing Dano? And yet you're calling him a "sadistic psychopathic creep" - even though he clearly felt remorseful and had to struggle with his conscience in order to be able to go through with it. Obviously, what he did was not "right" or excusable, but in a situation like this, who is thinking of excuses? I do find it understandable though that even a decent person can be pushed to such extraordinary, cruel actions by extreme despair and panic, seeing the time run out. And the stunt Dano did with the dog is quite telling, considering that, unlike what Jackman did to him, it obviously wasn't compelled by any circumstance or serve any practical purpose; there clearly was a dark, creepy dimension to this manchild.



"facts are stupid things" Ronald Reagan

reply

Wait, how is he innocent? He knew the kids were there, right? He didn't tell anyone.

reply

We cannot blame mentally disabled people on the same grounds we do fully functioning people though. I see it as basically blaming a guy with learning difficulties for having learning difficulties.

reply

As far as I'm concerned, if Alex is functioning enough to obtain a legal drivers licence and drive a motor home, he can answer basic questions and be truthful with his responses. But no, instead he withheld important information from both Keller and authorities, brazenly lied, played dumb, and glibly antagonised Keller on multiple occasions. Alex was even willing to slash Keller, Nancy and Franklin in order to escape rather than do the right thing and reveal the location to the girls.

reply

It's a little thing called "character flaws". It's used in good stories.

reply

Are you serious? 90 minutes is plenty. Ample. More then necessary. Anything beyond that, and you are are clearly a lunatic who just can't seem to move on.

Too much living in the past, that's the problem these days.

I once knew a woman who grieved for 17 minutes after her two sets of fraternal twins and her adopted Sudanese child with the learning disorder were abducted. But to be fair, it was a very intense 17 minutes of extreme and physical grieving. Then, she went to her yoga class.

We would all do well to take a page from her book.

reply

Pffft. Yeah right! For your sake I hope you were merely trolling.

reply

I'm glad your not MY dad.

reply

Yeah that was low, but he kind of heard that his child may be dead. Ppl have said things out of less anger and sorrow.
And he didnt know that Loki had no clue to Tylers whereabouts anyway before the phonecall from the saleswoman. And he already reacted quick.

---
Lincoln Lee: I lost a partner.
Peter Bishop: I lost a universe!

reply

Original poster come on!!! I thought Hugh's character was the most realistic character of the whole movie. Who wouldn't act the eay he did. Plus he was basically right throughout the entire movie!!! Specially after what Alex whispered to him on the parking lot. He had every right

reply

No one has a 'right' to torture another human being the way he did. No one.

reply

You state that as if it were a fact. It isn't. It's your opinion. Most governments, police forces and militaries justify torture (legally sanctioned or otherwise) if there's a chance it will save lives. Last time I checked, there hasn't been another terrorist attack on the level of 9/11 in the United States. Can you figure out why?

reply

Yup, he was a massive douche and he won't get my sympathies either, and the way he lies and covers up his crime would've made him a perfect antagonist for any movie if he hadn't lost his daughter. However, like the kidnapper (widow, not Keller) said something like, she along with her husband declared a war on God and fiendishly enjoyed decent people turn into monsters, that was a their way of getting at God for taking their child. So, for the movie plot at least, it makes sense.

reply

[deleted]

Well, the bottom line is, one should do anything to save/protect their loved ones, i just don't like when they blame the wrong people...or harm them...

Bring me a dream Burke,bring me a dream!

reply

Um.... That deer was food. If you eat, you kill. Even if you're a vegetarian.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

reply

*spoiler alert* Keller knew without a shadow of a doubt that the motor home driver was the guy that took his daughter. Keller heard him say, "they only cried when I left them"or whatever the guy said and the police didn't really take him seriously. Keller knew that that was the man who took his daughter and the police failed to get the job done. If it wasn't for Keller, I don't believe that his daughter would have been found. Anyways, great performances all around and a really good movie.

reply

Sure, his actions lead to the resque, but if the Priest went to police and told about his captured pedophile, the police would have got them before those incedents in first place.

Basicly: It's a movie about justice.

reply