... Or, perhaps you made this comment without finishing the show, because after a few episodes...
Well yeah, exactly that.
You can read through my dialogue with the other poster who replied earlier in the thread but yeah, I made the OP after watching maybe two or three episodes.
I still think his behaviour was pretty stupid re Martha and especially that scene I referenced - not saying anything to his landlady / former girlfriend's mum. But you can take his trauma into account to explain his repeat paralysis behaviour after we learn of his earlier rape. If you want to find an excusable reason.
Yeah, I agree re him being a moron with Darrien and selling himself out in the belief that it was going to lead to a shot at fame. I think I mentioned further up that it was an interesting spin on the sort of #metoo / Weinstein victim behaviour to see a male character make the same mistakes...
But I don't agree re the ending and his confrontation with Darrien being spineless.
It was a very open to interpretation scene I guess but I think, like you said, it showed a power shift. I mentioned in one of the other threads on here I saw it as a moment of empowerment. It's acknowledged between them that what happened to him is in the public domain but he hasn't named him yet. Maybe Darrien fearfully offers him a paid position to buy his silence and he takes it, not in a weakened way but because means he takes control over his abuser.
Like you said, he gets a measure of control back. So I guess it's a positive scene, even although it does play it slightly oddly and could look like the guy's got away with it, unless you really think about it.
reply
share