MovieChat Forums > Star Trek (2009) Discussion > How does a single star going supernova d...

How does a single star going supernova destroy an entire galaxy?


Stars in the Milky Way are separated by an average of five light years - (a single light year is about 10 trillion kilometers), and and there are 100-400 billion stars in our galaxy. A single supernova is no more threat to our galaxy than a firecracker is to the Three Gorges Dam in China. Not even a hypernova poses a threat to the whole Milky Way. It's amazing that no one out of the hundreds, if not thousands, of people who worked on this movie thought to point this out.

reply

Cos Abrams is a cunt who doesn't understand space.

reply

It didn't destroy an entire galaxy, it just destroyed the solar system where Romulus and Remus were.

Star Trek Online actually explained it far better than JJ ever did. The writers for the game came up with a brilliant explanation as to why the supernova was able to destroy a solar system several light years away within just a few hours. The explosion was not natural, and was traveling partially through subspace, moving far faster than anyone anticipated. Had this explosion been natural, the shock-waves would not have reached the Romulus System for 300 years, giving the inhabitants plenty of time to leave.

Evidently an ancient, dangerous alien race called the Iconians had teamed up with a rogue branch of the Tal Shiar and had developed a weapon using highly advanced technology, which was fired into the star to make it blow up.

Your character ends up investigating the Hobus Supernova, and discovers that time travel and Empress Sela were involved in pissing off the Iconians in the distant past, leading to the Hobus Supernova and the Iconian War a quarter of a million years later. It was far better writing than Abrams could even dream of.

reply

Remember, in Abrams "Force Awakens" he had people on another planet in a different solar system able to watch other planets be destroyed as they look up in the sky with their naked eyes. He doesn't care about science or logic, just what looks good to him image wise.

reply

Comic book physics and an inability to understand the inverse square law. It would be more believable if it was a gamma ray burst which is directional vs a supernova.

reply

You do realize you're discussing astrophysics about a Star Trek movie, right?. Like, a supernova destroying a galaxy would be the most realistic thing in it.

reply