MovieChat Forums > 60 Minutes (1968) Discussion > How relevant are TV newsmagazines like 6...

How relevant are TV newsmagazines like 60 Minutes and similar shows?


Last night I watched The Insider, and a lot of the story in that film revolves around 60 Minutes. A key plot element is a story they are planning to run about Big Tobacco and how explosive this story could be and how huge of an impact it could have on the tobacco industry. It's considered to be a VERY BIG DEAL since, at the time, 60 Minutes still had the viewership to move mountains.

I still DVR 60 Minutes and make a point to actually watch it every once in a while. Sometimes I'll also watch Dateline, 20/20 and 48 Hours.

It made me wonder about the relevance of 60 Minutes and similar programs today. Do any of you guys watch any of these programs, or something similar? What social impact do you think programs like this are able to have today?

reply

I really enjoyed The Insider. The 2015 movie Truth is also about 60 Minutes.

I grew up with this show, have always loved it. Awhile back, I watched 50 Years With 60 Minutes. It was a fascinating, nostalgic ride. Some recent episodes I've enjoyed : the progress of the artificial intelligence industry, spy novelist John Le Carre, the creation of the Chobani yogurt empire and just this past Sunday evening, an interview with Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson.

reply

I'll have to check out Truth. I just looked it up and it sounds interesting. Surprisingly I've never even heard of it.

Obviously today we live in the Internet era, which has changed a lot of things, but I feel like newsmagazine shows serve a different need than the up-to-the-minute news that you get from the Internet.

For one, they tell a lot of stories that you otherwise just would not even hear about. For instance, recently 60 Minutes did a story on a chess program in some rural town in Mississippi that's being headed by a secretive millionaire. That particular story wasn't hard-hitting news but it was interesting and something I had no idea about. In fact, I'd say that MOST stories that get covered by these programs are stories that I was not familiar with at all, despite having hours of daily exposure to the Internet.

For another, they are able to land important interviews with major public figures, including world and industry leaders.

I mostly watch 60 Minutes and 48 Hours. 60 Minutes provides interesting news while 48 Hours gives me my true crime fix. But I sometimes watch Dateline and 20/20 as well. Like I said, I DVR all four of them every week.

reply

Much like The Insider, Truth is a thinking man's drama and you clearly exhibit the intellect for that.

I agree with your assessment. They're so detailed and I guess you could say " off the beaten path" type of stories. That's why I've always enjoyed the program so much. I especially like when they go into investigative mode and do an expose, which is what Truth is all about.

I've learned to really distrust internet news and view the stories with initial skepticism, much of the media as well. I've had several experiences this past week that reinforce that.

I also watch the other programs you've mentioned and Crime Watch Daily With Chris Hansen has become somewhat of a staple.

reply

Regarding trust in the media, I do think that it's an issue right now.

We have to be willing to understand that journalists occasionally will make honest mistakes. After all, they are often reporting on events that they were not eye witnesses to, trying to piece the story together second-hand. You have to expect that every once in a while they'll get something wrong.

The bigger concern of course is that a journalist will allow their bias to get in the way and they will either put forward an outright lie or they will not do their due diligence in vetting their sources. I am unsure exactly how much that goes on, but it is scary.

reply

The problem with Truth is it's a fake documentary, literally Mary Mapes' conspiracy theory about her firing from 60 minutes.
Amazing that many critics fell for this bullshit! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3859076/criticreviews

Truth: A Terrible, Terrible Movie About Journalism https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2015/10/truth-a-terrible-terrible-movie-about-journalism/412036/

The film concerns 60 Minutes’s 2004 pre-election reporting on George W. Bush’s service in the Texas Air National Guard. Two documents central to the news program’s contention that Bush was granted preferential treatment were subsequently revealed to be almost certainly fraudulent. This error ultimately resulted in the retirement from CBS of Dan Rather (played here with likable understatement by Robert Redford) and the firing of Mapes and others. It’s in the midst of her “conspiracy theory” speech that Mapes suggests that the fraudulent documents were a cunning ploy by pro-Bush forces—immaculately sophisticated in some respects, but childishly certain to be recognized as fake in others—intended to discredit further reporting into his military record. Could this be true? Stranger things have happened, I suppose. But it’s pretty much the definition of a conspiracy theory.

reply

I never even perceived it as a documentary but as a movie. And I really don't need a rundown of what it's about, I know what it was about. It's like Zodiac, a movie that leaves people somewhat hanging in limbo and debating forever.

reply