MovieChat Forums > Raising Cain (1992) Discussion > De Palma, Lithgow, the whole shebang

De Palma, Lithgow, the whole shebang


I love John Lithgow, and he does really turn in a great performance here, but are we hurting for great Lithgow showings? No. Is the movie worthy of him? Allow me to pontificate.

There are a few Brian De Palma movies that really do it for me, Carrie, Dressed to Kill, even Scarface is kind of fun (though not good enough to warrant its place on every 18 year college boy's wall) and I really should be searching before that time for the gems, though Blowout is on my list to see, but I recently started watching his more recent films and Raising Cain is a prime example of everything that began to go wrong. It's so close to great, but more accurately could be described as trash.

My main issue with this movie is the ongoing battle between De Palma's refined visual sense and the nearly incomprehensible plot. Now I'm not dumb, I think, so I am not sitting wondering when the credits roll what happened, but I did feel rather exhausted. The movie creates new realities for you like every 5 minutes, and the first few times you're like oh, I guess that was a dream, or that wasn't a dream, or that happened before this, or this person's not dead, or yes they are, or no they're not. I can keep up, but that doesn't mean that it feels satisfying. Now if it's intentionally unsatisfying, that would be one thing, but none of the story choices seem like they're choices at all, and intentionally unsatisfying can actually be extremely satisfying if it's done well (see Funny Games.) This just seems sloppy and "intentionally unsatisfying" is what you would say if you fucked up and had no better excuse.

While all this hamfisty plot mania is going on, you can tell that every shot and scene is so carefully visually considered to the extreme. I couldn't help but just be annoyed that he didn't spend 5% less energy on the visuals (they would still be great) and put that energy towards coherence.

So it's very annoying, and if that's the point, then bravo, I guess.

The only positive reason to watch is the off the wall performance by John Lithgow, but you're better off watching Harry and the Hendersons, The World According to Garp, or if you need Lithgow to be crazy to like him, then watch Dexter season 4, where he was flawless.

reply

I've tried watching it many times and it's impossible.

reply

I actually enjoy this movie. It has the distinct DePalma flavor! I find it very satisfying, but that is my personal opinion and feeling. It has twists and turns. I like that sort of thing.
As for Lithgow, He is flawless in just about anything he does. Even Harry and the Hendersons, which is one goofy film. That is just my opinion. Off the wall? I prefer his segment in Twilight Zone, The Movie.
He was flawless in 3rd Rock From the Sun.

reply

His Twilight Zone the movie segment is great, but it was already great when Shatner did it, and it always bothered me that the best segment of that movie was rehash

reply

Shatner's episode was great. I really didn't mind that they chose that particular episode to.... reboot? It was actually a great parody. Too bad that they didn't choose a whole slew of episodes to parody in that movie. It was a hodgepodge of different directors doing different things. Talk about no coherence, and it was totally unsatisfying.
I can respect your feelings on Raising Cain. I sort of felt the same way the first time I saw it, but I decided to give it another try when our son bought it. It grew on me. A few more viewings, and I was finding more about it that was interesting.
I suppose it isn't for everyone..... obviously not your cup of tea, but I find it to be compelling, gritty, and an edge of my seat thriller.
To each their own.

reply

The 80s twilight zone series did pick several classic eps to reboot and I love it

reply

You do? I haven't really watched too many of those from the 80's. I hated what was done to The After Hours. I prefer the original with Anne Francis as the mannequin.
I do enjoy the 80's reboot of Alfred Hitchcock presents/hour. Many of those reboots from the 80's were good!

reply

I do love it, it definitely hit and miss, but there's great stuff here and there, any Wes Craven directed episode, George R R Martin written are great, but the remakes are not the ones I love usually, I just love the vibe, same goes for Amazing stories and AHP

reply

Loved Amazing Stories too. And here I thought we had nothing in common when I saw your original post!
I gotta go now. Places to go, people to see. Actually, I just have to get up and get a few things done. Later!

reply

How about watching Shrek 1 or Daddy's Home 2? "You made Tee Gtee in bed".."Arms Akimbo!"

reply