[deleted]
I love Highlander 2 ! The original version is a bit inconsistent, but the Renegade Version is really good ! I just see Highlander 1 and 2 and the rest of the series as two different timelines. I made a detailed Connor chronology to explain that, I posted it on this board.
shareIt's obvious. Highlander 3, 4 and 5 ignores Highlander 2. Highlander 2 was a "What if". An alternate story and timeline.
sharea few of these aired on television recently, i don't know how many there are but seems this was the only one with recognisable actors, i wonder how they got connery to appear in this, it looks like a typical turkey or b movie. i always thought the leading lady virginia madsen looks like cnn's rosemary church did a few years ago when she was more vibrant, speaking of look alikes am i the only one who thinks lambert in makeup reminded of marlon brando and the villain in ghostbusters 2?
my heart i protect,
putting on a stoneface,
youre an obstacle while im passing along,
youre in my way and im too old to be made a fool of,
then you put your mysterious talent on,
turning me soft and mushy,
you turned the heat on,
put a spell on my corn dog,
as my heart jumping like a popcorn.
i wonder how they got connery to appear in this
Uhhhh...no.
"Ghostbusters II" was absolutely wretched.
"Jaws 2" is still one of the most unintentionally funny sequels ever, with the rubbier than rubbery shark in the film WAY too much!
And, certainly others.
"Highlander II" is more the standard, completely unnecessary sequel that is passable in-one-ear-out-the-other entertainment.
there's something in there, it's not the worst, it's got some cool things to look at
share