i mean did they really need to have a bad guy holding a machine gun to the head of a baby? Come on. How did they even shoot that part of the movie? If I were an actor I wouldn't have been too happy about filming that and if I were that kid's parent I would have been demanding big, big money even though I knew that the gun was a replica.
Ah,the baby was a replica too.
Hobb taking over was a tad questionable (especially threatening to cut Angie off of nuke). But maybe, Cane left it to him cause Hobb was the closest thing to a male heir.
In a sense, the film did try to cater to kids, with Robo's war on drugs. And to the MTV audience with the single/video: "The Kid Goes Wild" by Babylon A.D.
Robo's failed reprogram as a softy, must have been a message to the parent groups out there. That, even tho kids like the franchise, don't mean we have to make him parent-friendly.
Kudos goes to Willard E. Pugh (Mayor Kuzak), he put on a great performance of a incompetent mayor who still means well. You can slowly see OCP turn into the bad guys, which was a good lead into RoboCop 3 (a film that receives much more negatively vague criticisms).
Plus Robo beat some serious ass. Yeah, RoboCain went haywire and shot up a lot of people, just shows that Faxx's idea failed. Don't know why people are whining about violence when the first film had violence too?.
Sure I wonder what Verhoeven's ideal sequel would have been, but Kershner did a bang-up job. Just should have kept some of them deleted scenes.
IMDB's most overlooked poster,giving you true posts since 2001J-Dilla 4-Eva
reply
share