MovieChat Forums > F/X (1986) Discussion > Worst performance ever by an actress

Worst performance ever by an actress


Martha Gerhman gives what has to be the single worst acting? performance in FX. A very entertaining movie but why is she in this?

reply

I thought so when I first saw it in '86. And when I watched it again this afternoon, she was so over the top awful that I jumped on IMDb assuming that hoardes over the years will have made the same observation. There HAS to be a story behind this, whether it's about how/why she was cast in the first place, or how/why she remained employed after shooting the first seen. Her parents may explain some of it. I note now that she's had some infrequent but decent day-player gigs in the years since, but never anything that came CLOSE to this costarring role.

The possibility has occurred to me that every one of her lines was looped in later, and so there's someone else to blame. But the fact remains that this was a major picture, and how they allowed it to be released with this singular appalling performance remains a mystery.

We're much more SFX savvy today that we were in 1986, so the effects in F/X are really quite quaint now. But it was an exciting supposed "insider's peek" when it was made. And, yes, it features perhaps the worst female performance ever put on 35mm film.

reply

Just have to answer this, as it so false, and wonder what makes both of you so spiteful - jealousy of some kind?

Martha Gehman was actually part of the 'soul' of F/X - and felt entirely real in the part.

She was also a lot of fun, and a 'draw' - you wanted to see her on screen, and wondered what she would do next. A good foil for Rollie too.

Maybe you just don't know what people are like on the inside of entertainment - stage, big screen, or little...

Better next time...please...and a little bit of the generous spirit also wouldn't hurt.


reply


"What people are like on the inside of entertainment - stage, big screen, or little..." is immaterial to the quality of her performance. (And your speculation as to what I do or do not know couldn't be more off the mark.) I've known actors who were wonderful, generous and otherwise fine human beings who couldn't pull off a convincing performance to save their lives, just as I've known actors who were the height of rudeness, selfishness and greed who were so wonderful in some of their roles that one could deeply resent their brilliant talent having been bestowed upon such a sack of scum. (I've also known brilliants actors who were terrific people, and so forth.)

A critique of a performance is not a comment on the performer's personal character or worth as a human being.

I don't know whether your mention of this indicates a personal knowledge of the actress, or simply a level of empathy (perhaps an unhealthy level) for an actress who would be the subject of such a scathing comment. I assure you, if I were to see similar comments about one of my own performances listed on IMDB, I'd be embarrassed, and perhaps hurt - though some of my own performances doubtless deserve just such a ripping. My being hurt would make the comments no less accurate. And in this context, I don't believe anyone is obligated to temper their comments or opinions out of concern that the subject might one day actually read those words.

Judging a performance is largely a subjective pursuit. After all, there are knowledgeable, intelligent folks who can take opposing views as to the value of virtually every film/play and individual performance ever produced.

On the other hand, there are some standards which are, if intangible and very difficult to articulate, almost universal. For example, "Howard the Duck," Plan 9 From Outer Space" and "Ishtar" all certainly have their advocates. But by and large, there is a broad consensus that these are terrible films.

By the same token, I feel very confident believing that, if large numbers were to sit and view Martha Gehman's performance in F/X, the overwhelming majority would agree that her performance is bad to the point of embarrassment. Her line readings in F/X are unnatural and wooden. Her voice in F/X is flat, especially unconvincing at times of supposed stress, excitement or anger. (This latter prompted my speculation that virtually all of her lines were looped.) As Rollie ditches her and speeds away in his van, she's left in the street to call after him, supposedly frustrated, worried and angry. But given the tone of her words, one can't help but imagine a bored actress sitting in an editing bay, reading the words from a script in front of her while trying to synch her words with the action on a screen on the other side of the glass.

Indeed, that general affect - of being somehow completely distant from the activity on screen, disinterested while also ringing false and fake - is the hallmark of this particular performance from beginning to end.

Again, I conceed it's only my opinion and speculation, but I think most people would agree with these points, and supply many similar specifics of their own.

Finally, I confess I'm mystified at your suggestion that the comments are motivated by "jealousy." There was a time that, "you're just jealous..." was a quasi epithet hurled by 13 year old girls in the midst of an argument. But over the last decade or two, I've seen it become exceptionally common in a variety of debates, especially in politics. That is, criticize a performance, a vote, or an opinion, and so many today seem to be so quick to answer with some variant of "You're just jealous!" I think it's a juvenile response that indicates, at best, a juvenile affection for the subject of the disputed criticism - a rebuttal that shows the respondent doesn't have facts or a convincing argument available for their defense.

At the time of my original post, I was only able to locate three reviews contemporary to the release of F/X, and two of them gave specific attention to the bizarrely awful performance of Marth Gehman. The third, perhaps in an act of mercy, didn't mention it either way.

Marth Gehman may be a delightful person and a wonderful friend. She may have stellar performances in other productions. But in F/X, she absolutely sucks.

reply

Um..she sucked. People, let's call a spade a spade. Enough with the "political correctness already. The only way we can ever improve is to point out when our work is less than what is should be. I would want someone to point out to me my faults (and they have) so I can improve (which I hopefully have). How else can you effect change? Living in a glass bubble of imagined perfection?

reply

I'm eventually getting around to visiting the message boards for each of my favorites and this thread is just a howler!

And here I thought I was being unkind to this sweet young girl by saying she doesn't have a clue how to read a line. Nice to see my opinion getting some validation!

"You got it!" - Martha Gehman, FX (1986)

"I will rise from the ashes like a Tucson!"

reply

Yep, she sucked ! I am watching it right now on TV and HAD to look it up here on IMDB.com and comment !! I will keep it short, but reading this thread the same words pop up: flat & wooden.

I concur with some who question HOW this young lady GOT the part... Nice to know the casting-couch may still be in use !!

And yes, the F/X ARE cheesy to today's eyes... but back then, latex, squibs, and misc. pyro were the bomb ;))

reply

I think she's cute.

reply

Bluetone, that is the most well written execution of a fellow commentator I have ever read on IMDb. Actually, it's so funny I have to bump this thread just to preserve it for prosperity. Epic pwnage, I say... And the funny part is, you take great length and time, just to say that she sucks, majestically.




reply

We cant seriously be talking about the same movie.. I'm pretty sure you got mistaken with some other movie/actress, or are either related to Martha or completely blind of deaf to seriously consider her performance somewhat even remotely acceptable.

I mean jaleousy ?? I swear to god or buddah my 3 year old brother could do a better performance then that

you have GOT to be sarcastic, or you have serious lack of taste in acting...

------------------
I see dumb people everywhere, and sometimes, they don't even know they're dumb!

reply

[deleted]

I think over the years, that I have just blocked her out. But now that you all mention it, she is incredibly bad in this.

Apparently, she's related to someone powerful.

reply

Can you tell who Martha Gehman is in the movie? I've just seen it but I didn't catch the names. Is the blonde who Rollie calls to bring him his make-up stuff? The one who gives the little ship to the man in suit?

reply

Yes..that's her alright and i agree... bad acting

Shawn is cool, remember that :->

reply

[deleted]

I find her voice annoying. I don't see it as bad acting. And the "You got it!" line is just bad writing.

reply

I think she must have been somebody's sister or something, or maybe even slept with the producer. I know that sounds mean and nasty but she was terrible, she almost ruined the whole movie. Brian Dennehy showed up almost an hour into the movie and stole the show, that's an example of good acting. But Martha Gerhman was awful awful awful! Why did no one notice?

reply

Unsurprisingly, her IMDB biography has this long list of remarkable attributes:

{quote} Has blonde hair.

Daughter of Estelle Parsons and Richard Gehman.

Has a twin sister. {unquote}

I thought she added a (albeit unintentional) comic element to the film. She was bad, really bad, but I think there have been worse performances.

...it's alright, Ma, if I can't please him

reply

"I think she must have been somebody's sister or something, or maybe even slept with the producer."

Did anyone notice that one of the producers was Dodi Al Fayed?

Makes me wonder.


reply

I think she must have been somebody's sister or something, or maybe even slept with the producer.

In the world of funny handshakes it pays to be the daughter of an established actress.

Did anyone notice that one of the producers was Dodi Al Fayed?

Makes me wonder.

I caught the name in the intro credits, but his name was written Dodi Fayed and not Dodi Al-Fayed. So I thought maybe the name was more common than I expected, but checking it now, it was the same guy.

"Ok ok, all you have to do is drive down into the underpass and crash into the foam pillar. The guys on the scooters will be our own guys. Absolutely nothing to worry about. Here, have a shady parcel of money for your troubles."

reply

"You got it!" is one of those mindless cliches that spreads like wildfire and then dies a merciful death.

It ranks right up there with

"Back in the day"
"Yadda, yadda, yadda"
"Now, THAT's what I'm talkin' about"
"Sweeeeeeeeeeeeet!"
"At the end of the day"
and
"Whaddup?"

Years later we all realize how stupid and annoying those cliches are, but at the time people often feel "hip" by using them.

But you can't really blame an actress when she has to spew cliched lines...

reply

You're wrong. Mariah Carey gave the worst performance ever by an actress in Glitter.

reply

her performance was definite crap, but it was FAR from the worst performance I have ever seen. Go rent Day of the Warrior and you will see a couple dozen performances in that one movie that make this woman look like De Niro.

reply

Uh uh. Sandra Santiago, in ANY episode of Miami Vice. Blehhhhhh. This woman couldn't act her way out of a pay toilet.

reply

[deleted]

Fer cryin out loud! She was playin' a airhead! Somebody SO excited to have a movie job, but without enough sense to always follow Rollie's instructions correctly.

Don't ask a dyin' man ta lie his soul inta Hell

reply

Yeah, but she really sucked at it.

reply

I totally agree! As far as I'm concerned, her part in this film didn't detract from it one bit. Her character is supposed to be clueless--so she comes off as clueless. I liked her. Frankly, I've seen far worse performances by supposedly "better" actors.

reply

what about Angelina Jolie in Alexander?


...it's alright, Ma, if I can't please him

reply

I don't think Jolie's performance in Alexander was so bad...I think it was the writing/script. No one, not Colin Farrel, Plummer, Kilmer or even Hopkins, all of whom I respect from previous roles, could save this movie simply because of what they had to work with.

I'm your huckleberry...

reply

,,,,or Angelina Jolie in pretty much anything. I just came to this thread and just saw "F/X" again today--I think I only saw it in the theaters in 1986 but remembered liking it. I agree, her performance was off, but I'm sure she didn't write the dialougue "you got it" which she used at least twice.

reply

Oh no, I accept no insults about Saundra Santiago; I think she still rules, and I think she can act her way out of Coconut Grove, at worst.

reply

I agree she was bad. I watched it on Encore yesterday and she was plain horrible. This is the first time I've been on the FX message board and while watching it yesterday I was thinking maybe she's bad because that's the way they wanted her to play it. But after reading some of your messages I agree she was horrible.

reply

Her performance has always been the low point of this movie!

For me, she single-handedly takes it from a 7/10 down to a 6/10.

This movie was a family favorite growing up, and we always wondered how she got cast...

Glad to see we weren't alone!

reply

I think that Colleen Camp's "acting" in Smokey and the Bandit 3 ranks right up there in the realm of horrific acting.
Few performers have made me want to reach through the screen to strangle them, but Colleen Camp did in S&B3...
Annoying, grating, and petrified wood...
Yes, I know the movie blows, but the rest of the cast are the epitome of Sir Laurence Olivier, compared to that godawful performance.

Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain

reply

I think Colleen Camp has a heck of a body (yeah yeah, she's older now and all that; but in her prime, I think she was stacked!).

reply