MovieChat Forums > Dreamscape (1984) Discussion > Handled dreams better than Inception...

Handled dreams better than Inception...


My biggest gripe with Inception was that the dream sequences (which was composed of majority of the film) never felt like actual dreams.

They were way too literal, too concrete, and too linear.

For this to be a low budget film, the set designers did a fantastic job with the dream sequences in this film, actually making them look and feel like dreams, from the slow-motion being used to proper effect to convey a sense of molasses (which happens often in dreams, especially when you need to run or flee), as well as all of the distorted images, angles, and oblique structures when things feel "off", and also the transitional phases from one scene to the next that don't make sense but at the same time, feel transient.

Very few films have been able to capture the truly abstract and bizarre nature of dreams, but this film did it well.

It's a shame Nolan didn't take a more artistic approach to the dreamscapes in Inception, because they really could have used a level of creative sophistication as showcased in this film.

reply

all very true
i remember feeling exaclty that when watching it , such a long time ago ... memory faded .. like a dream
I remember the post apocalptic scenes outside the train
and the guy turning into a lizard

reply

Oh man, the post-apocalyptic scenes were done superbly well, especially the zombie train bit? That was like... perfectly executed.

And yeah, the sequences where they're running around the post-nuke wasteland actually seemed like the sort of strung-together sequencing you would find in a dream/nightmare. The morphing snake man segment was cool, but sadly the stop-motion claymation was kind of bad. Still, the way the horror elements were handled was pretty cool, and I'm really glad they filmed and edited it all together as if it was actually taking place in a dream.

reply

How would you compare it to the dreams in A Nightmare on Elm Street? Personally, I like Elm Streets dream sequences better.

reply

Actually...

I think they do a generally good job in that series of making the nightmares feel like nightmares. They could be a little more whimsical... no, more wispy? I think wispy is the right word.

But otherwise, A Nightmare On Elm Street generally captures that fleeting dream-like feeling, while also being grounded enough to feel terrifying. The thing that makes nightmares so frightening is that there's still an element or hint of realism there -- like it's actually happening -- but then the bizarre and the grotesque emerge and that's what makes them so scary. And generally, the Elm Street series has been good at capturing the bizarre, grotesque, and the grounded all at the same time. I'm reminded of the motorcycle death sequence in I think Part IV or V? That was absolutely horrifying, and still pretty gruesome to this day, where Dan is skinned alive by the burning tubes and electric wires of the motorcycle? Yikes. What a way to go.

reply

That motorcycle death was something out of this world. Yeesh it gives me the jeebies.

reply