MovieChat Forums > Christine (1983) Discussion > Alexandra Paul

Alexandra Paul

posted 8 years ago by Dan_Garten
7 replies | jump to latest

She's quite bad in this. I wonder how she was cast? I could understand if it were D-grade stuff, but this movie was a fairly big deal: Columbia Pictures, peak Stephen King and John Carpenter.

[–] jackiefoxybrown 8 years ago

I'm familiar with her from Lifetime movies and Baywatch, several years ago.....I just realized the love interest is the woman from all those bad Lifetime movies.
I don't think her acting was that bad in the movie, however, I guess it's safe to say she got hired primarily for her looks.

[–] nicotinequeen63 8 years ago

I thought she was great in this role, very believable. But I didn't particularly care for her in Baywatch...thought she got too skinny and lost some of her natural beauty.

[–] TampaOutlaw84 8 years ago

Its called getting old!

[–] Stratego (29252) 6 years ago

She wasn't THAT old in Baywatch. I just took a look at her profile pic on here. She looks awful. Must be her vegan diet or something.

[–] JamesAvalon 7 years ago

While not great, I thought she was just fine. I would not have recognized her as the one from Baywatch, where she didn't stand out physically. In Christine, she is really beautiful.

[–] jasonbourne (1027) 6 years ago

She was good in this and looked very nice. The movie wasn't that impressive. Once you knew what Christine was about, it became boring.

[–] Urogy (176) 6 years ago

Yes, she looks VERY HIDEOUS in this movie! A dude w/big Bon Jovi hair is what she looked like!