MovieChat Forums > The Burning (1981) Discussion > Why do people like this movie!

Why do people like this movie!


I am a 70's and 80's horror film nut and was really looking forward to seeing this movie so I bought it to add to my collection. Boy, what a mistake!

The acting was horrible, the plot was barely there, and the killing scenes were sickening!

The only thing I did like was seeing Jason Alexander(Hey George!!!) pre-Seinfeld days- I guess we all have to pay the bills somehow.

3 out of a 10.

reply

you say you like 70s and 80s horror films but then you say the killing scenes were sickening and the plot was barely there? have you not seen many of these type of horror films from the 70s and 80s? in my oppinion I thought the acting was a bit more decent than other slasher movies of this type

reply

[deleted]

You obviously haven't seen any horror movies if you consider the gore to be sickening. It may be gross and gorier than most slashers but it's definitely not sickening.

reply

If you don't like this movie, how dare you call yourself a 70s 80s horror fan?!

http://www.redmattersite.com <-- check out some of my comedy webisodes!

reply

Man, all these people calling themselves fans of horror films, yet they b*tch about bad acting, and over the top gore, what's wrong with this picture?

reply

[deleted]

There's a difference between horror fans and gore-hounds (hint: one cares about quality, the other doesn't).

reply

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082118/board/thread/87295629

reply

i remember watching this film on vhs before it got banned in a video nasty clampdown in the uk and i (hope im right ) seem to remember that each death scene was a different way of killing , which amused me into to trying to guess how he would murder the next victim.

Will have to see if i can yet get hold of this on dvd now its no longer banned just hope they have put the fingers being chopped with shears back in which is what got cut in some versions.

reply

[deleted]

getting banned makes it more of a "WANT TO SEE" thing.

This ones way better then F13. Sure, it's nothing monumental, but it's goriest then most of the slashers then and it has more realistic gore scenes then most of the slasher now have.

Cropsy is also better then most of the slashers then. I really liked his make up, I won't tell what it is cuz of the spoilers.

Raft scene was classic and it's "scarier" then most of the slashers.

Now, JUST BEFORE DAWN... I think that was overrated (but it's ok movie in general, for a slasher movie)

reply

Amateurish piece of crap. Its reputation comes mainly from being banned for so long. Not as bad as I Spit on Your Grave, because it actually has sync sound, but that's about all.

"What I want for Christmas is please go away!" - Martin Tasker.

reply

I first saw this film when i was 8. It was round at my friends house and his big sister put it on. Im sure it was the Thorn EMI uncut version because of the Raft massacre scene being so in your face. It was a very nasty unpleasant film made on a shoestring budget...what haunted me for months afterwards was how creepy the locations were. It was knowing that maniac was out there with those shears, ready to murder those kids. Grim. I'd go as far to say that this was far more nastier (but nowhere near as good) as Halloween (1978 of course)

reply

I'm watching this tonight I got a whole 80's horrorfest from amazon.

Watched Prom Night II last night and OMG so horrible and tedious I wanted to tear my eyes out.

I hope this is half decent.

reply

I agree with whoever said that Tom Savini's effects were the only reason to see the film. The raft scene is the only good scene in the movie. The rest of the film, well, just be prepared to have a few drinks and make fun of it.

That's what I did.

reply

I've heard about The Burning for years, mostly because of Tom Savini's special effects that everyone swore were his best work in his entire career. I saw a few bootlegs at conventions, and saw clips from the movie in "Going To pieces - The Rise And Fall Of Slasher Films" I began to show interest and lucky enough when I finally decided to check it out, it was all ready released on DVD.

I like The Burning simply because it came right after Friday The 13th was released. This was when the slasher phase had just started and the earlier films had more style and class put into them then the other slashers that were coming out one after another after another in the mid to late 1980's. Sure it was a bastard cousin of Friday the 13th, but I think it had more going for it then your average every day slasher film.

The film had a great back story, haunting score, likable characters (which is rare for a horror movie), great cast of then unknowns, amazing special effects, and a great ending. I think the reason I liked it, is because it didn't become a series like every other slasher film that was coming out at that time. It stood the test of time and still in my taste holds up today. The raft scene by far is one of the greatest slasher moments ever on screen, and the settle, yet creepy ending at the campfire is beautifully shot. Let's just pray there won't ever be a remake!

"You know, your clothes may say disco, but your eyes say rock n' roll."






reply

I'll dare to go as far as saying I thought this was better than Friday the 13th. Perhaps Friday is a good film on it's own (it is). But compared to the films that followed, it was pretty bare boned. The characters weren't all that interesting, the cast was small numbered, and the killer wasn't all that interesting. And then Jason came into play, and we had this odd, creepy villain of a character, who we almost pity because of his life circumstances.

Same with this film. I liked the bigger, broader cast. There were more characters of all different ages and social class. Fischer Stevens was a geeky guy and a jokester, but not the stereotypical over-the-top F13 brand of goofballs. Jason Alexander was a good actor, and brought some real sarcastic wit to the film. The oddball Alfred was sympathetic and vulnerable. It seems like he set the horror standard of having an outcast/nerdy guy who nobody likes stumble upon the grisly truth before everyone else, and nobody believes him because he's such an outsider.

The film was stylishly shot. It almost resembles a comic in some manner. Things are very theatrical, the blood very red, the camera angles obscuring some things from the shot. The quick cuts and the shadowy killer (who we don't see until the very end) was nicely done and helped sell the ambiguity of the character and make us feel what the campers felt, as they only saw glimpses of him. I call it the JAWS technique. Less is more.

Of course, there's the awesome musical score, which I find much catchier and eerier than Friday's orchestrated score. The creepy spaceship synthesizers really added depth to the scenes (thanks, Rick Wakeman!). The theme is catchy and retro, and really appealed to me. I have the score on my IPOD, I liked it so much. Because of all the slasher films from that era which I have seen, this one had the best musical direction. Maybe you beg to differ, but I'm a man who loves his retro synths.

The setting, camp, would prove to be a popular one in the slasher genre. Being that it came out simultaneous to Friday the 13th Part 2, it's hard to say who started what, but I think this generally set a standard for gore and innovative kills, as well as the sense of familiarity with the camp atmosphere. It's definately inspired by Friday the 13th, but really only with the camp thing. You could also say Friday the 13th ripped off HALLOWEEN, which in turn was inspired by BLACK CHRISTMAS. But they are all good and unique because they all posess certain qualities that seperate them from one another.

For instance, most slasher films that followed used the tired old 'I hear a noise, let me go searching for it' trick. In this film, it was the other way around. Cropsy just came at them and stabbed them, in quite brutal ways, when all they were doing was minding their own business. So, in other words, it stayed away from the more tedious of horror cliches by making the characters a little more savvy and a little less "curious like a cat" wandering into traps because of their own stupidity. You know? Like that one girl who thinks it's her boyfriend outside so for some reason she decides to go out and look, ultimately leading to her demise? THE BURNING kept that scenerio on the down low, and that helped.

I'm going to wrap this up now, but I would just like to stress how awesome this film was for me. I have been wanting to see it for a long time, and I have to say it beat my expectations with some really shocking and suspenseful scenes. Maybe it's not OSCAR-worthy, and maybe it's got some editing flubs, but when you look at the positive aspects, it really boils down to being a fun ride, which I actually found superior to the first two films in the "Jason" series.

The actresses didn't hurt either. Nice full-frontal nudity, and charming modesty from the young ladies. They seemed a bit more in-charge than the bimbos in some other films. They didn't let some jackass guy take advantage of them. In fact, I believe only one couple had "true" sexual intercourse. The other girl was outraged by her boyfriend's advances and libido, and she didn't give in. I admired that character choice, because it shined a light on more independent females in horror films. And although there was no real FINAL GIRL, I felt like the film was fair to both sexes. It didn't glorify the acts, and it certainly didn't prove any kind of gender bias.

Those are all the reasons why I like this movie. Case closed.



People who don't close their mouths when they chew make me FURIOUS!
-Mr. Furious, MYSTERY MEN

reply

[deleted]

lol I'm watching this movie, sorry not a horror buff, but I thought it was just funny seeing all the young actors fisher stevens, jason alexander, brian backer lol they're like babies. I look at it from the cliche point of view it's so 80's cliche horror. I liked Jason alexander alot haha

reply