MovieChat Forums > Capricorn One (1978) Discussion > Was the murder of the astronauts not the...

Was the murder of the astronauts not the first intention?


Apologies if this has been addressed elsewhere, but there's too much to wade through.

I watched this again last week, and see it completely differently to how I saw it the first time.

Firstly, I don't think the other two astronauts were killed. It's more likely they were held, with the idea of killing them when all three were recaptured.

Secondly, was the heat shield failure rigged - or was it an unexpected glitch which meant the astronauts had to die. If that hadn't happened would they just have relied on the astronauts to keep quiet, maybe with a threat against their families to guarantee that?

reply

Sorry for my eng

i dunno the first, i've always thought that tey were killed on sight but i've read a lots of theores so i dunno but...
For the second question you forgot that they were taking the astronauts on the island so i don't think the shield stuff was already rigged...and then that evil guy looked really surprised so i don't think was already decided. Maybe as you said, if everything would have been ok they would have used the treathing to family to keep their mouths closed

reply

Well, I think the first two were killed on sight. Nuke the site from orbit -- only way to be sure.

And I think the deaths were always part of the plan. At the outset, the plotters threatened to kill the three families -- or at least bluffed that they would -- either way, as soon as they did that, there was no going back. Imagine if they went through with their fakery, and brought the three astronauts back alive, and then one or more of the men decided to trade his career and reputation for the need to tell the truth? There would have been a massive public meltdown. The plotters simply couldn't take that chance, if only in the interests of self-preservation.

So they had to fake the landing and the nearly-getting-home, to make the program look like a near-success and justify further funding. But killing the three astronauts was the only way to guarantee that the word would never get out about the plot. (No doubt the few involved in the actual photography were quietly disappeared as well.) So I think the heat-shield failure was always planned; it was a credible way to contain the chance of exposure without bringing the mission into technical disrepute. The plotters' one big mistake (without which the movie wouldn't have had a Third Act, natch) was in not killing the astronauts immediately, once the heat-shield had "failed".

As for the fugitive astronauts, the safest, most reliable course of action was to kill each one separately, as soon as he was found. And presumably, hide them in the desert and leave predators to dispose of the remains. Take their suits, probably, and any identifying personal effects; maybe cut off their hands and heads. Far less risky than carting bodies with them, whether alive or dead, and completely deniable should anything go wrong.


tl;dr : Kill tham! Kill them all!!!



You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

reply

I'm pretty sure they were trying to kill the astronauts once they fled the hangar. The helicopters were shooting at Brolin once he got in the plane. Besides, what would be the point of capturing them and keeping them alive? Every second they're alive threatens to expose the conspiracy. They had to die.

I assumed the heat shield failure was a surprise to Hollbrook, he seemed genuinely shocked when it happened and the astronauts "died" upon re-entry. I think the plan legitimately was to put the astronauts in the pod once it landed and make sure they knew that if they ever talked they and their families would be killed.

reply

I still maintain that killing any of them before they had them all would have been madness. If only one escaped, that would be enough to get them the death sentence - you'd surely not risk murder until there was no-one to testify against you?

Did the writers intend us to think the NASA men were incompetent? I don't think so - I think it was a plot weakness, and there should have been some clarification about what happened to the other two astronauts.

reply

They had already escaped once - every moment they were alive was another chance for them to escape again. They had to be killed immediately. And the conspirators have already tried to kill them, I don't think they're worried about going from attempted murder to murder if they get caught. They think they won't get caught. All they have to do is catch these three and kill them.

reply

I think it was always the intention to kill them (once they knew that the mission had to be faked) but kept them alive long enough.....to carry out the fake Mars landing.....making it look as if it *could* be achieved (which, in turn, kept the funding alive for future space explorations)
Faking something as big as this, would require 100% loyalty on all sides (something I don't think NASA had in it's astronauts)

reply

I don't think the heat shield was planned either. Had they pulled off the original plan, the astronauts would have been a gold mine for future funding. Once the accident occurred they became a liability.

reply

The flares going up seemed strongly symbolic of a “last gasp.”

They were killed IMHO

reply

Maybe not. If one got away (Which did happen), then they could always bring the others out saying they "rescued" them. They needed all three of them before they could take any further action.

reply

Actually you (PaladinNJ) and RosieT20 above raise good points:

I still maintain that killing any of them before they had them all would have been madness. If only one escaped, that would be enough to get them the death sentence - you'd surely not risk murder until there was no-one to testify against you?


I now think it's likely the other two astronauts were alive and in captivity at the end. Faking the entire mission is one thing; committing murder is another thing entirely.

After all, the NASA guys could've killed Elliot Gould's reporter more easily than framing him up and taking pot-shots at him, too. They didn't.

Though, in reflection, I don't think it changes the movie much either way.

reply

I think they killed the astronauts as they found them.

They were only the two helicopters and the guys piloting them available to do the dirty work, because they couldn't risk having more people in the know.

It's clear that they had to eliminate the astronauts to save the conspiracy, and they had to give it their best shot with the resources available.

Keeping the astronauts alive meant schlepping them around in the helicopters after they found them, which would slow down the helicopters with additional weight and would introduce the risk of having these passengers starting a struggle aboard. They would not be able to risk anything that would slow down finding the other astronauts.

As I said, they would have to give their best shot, and this means killing on sight.

As for the heat shield accident, I think it was an actual accident that caught them off guard. Maybe even caused by the course change for the charade.

reply

The may have been taken to a high security prison and incarcerated in solitary confiment for life or just killed them but the heat shield if it was rigged the look surprised look on the flight director face showed he knew nothing about it being rigged and flying them to an island they wouldn't have brought them back just kill them on the island and put them i a mass grave end of story

reply