I feel like that was their way of predicting that Trump's reign will be over by the time next season starts.
shareThat's how you saw it, hunh?
To me it seemed like the show's writers and performers think they're so meta and hip that parodying themselves from a previous opening constitutes great writing. It was stupid when McKinnon did it as Hilary, and it's just as dumb substituting Baldwin as Trump. But hey, at least it brings in a few more bucks for Leonard Cohen's estate.
"Trump's reign will be over by the time next season starts."
How'd that work out for you?
All you idiots who are being spoon-fed this narrative by the main-stream media that Trump's presidency is hanging by a thread, and any day now he's going to be perp-walked out of the White House, need to come back to reality. These liberal lap-dogs in the media (including SNL) are just chasing ratings, because they know you morons who are still in shock from the election a year ago will lap up anything telling you that Trump is unfit for office, and has no chance of making it to the end of his term.
It's been a year and a half. If there were any collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, the proof would have surfaced by now. You're all like the mule being led around by the farmer by dangling a carrot in front of your nose.
By the way, I wonder if they uncovered evidence that somehow Trump had approved a deal of selling 20% of America's uranium to Russia, and got money back from Russian investors, you would all be screaming about that being proof of collusion between the two?