MovieChat Forums > The Harder They Fall (1956) Discussion > When and why was the ending changed?

When and why was the ending changed?


The version of "The Harder They Fall" recently shown on TCM ends with Humphrey Bogart's character writing an article demanding that boxing be purged of racketeering and fakery "if it takes an act of Congress to do it." The original version had the Bogart character call for an outright ban on boxing. When and why was it changed? Did it have something to do with the fact that Budd Schulberg, on whose 1947 novel the film was based, wrote in his 1971 book "Loser and Still Champion" that he disliked the film's ending because he had written the book as a plea to reform boxing, not eliminate it?

reply

How could the original ending have been changed, decades later? The only way that would have been possible is if they had filmed two endings in 1956 and later cut out the "original" one for the "substitute", and there is no proof this ever happened. I have never seen an ending to this film other than the one shown. It may be different from what's in the novel but the movie is the same.

reply

A recent viewing on TCM, they reported that 2 endings actually had been shot. Now I'm curious if the original poster is correct and the ending shown in theaters was the demand to ban boxing. TCM reported both endings exactly as stated by the original poster. Interesting stuff.

reply

The ending seen on TCM is the same one that I've seen since I first saw the film in 1967 on TV. Even the book "The Films of Humphrey Bogart" which was published in 1965 reports the ending as shown.

It ain't easy being green, or anything else, other than to be me

reply

I think the other responders misunderstood the wording of your question.

Yes, of course, The Harder They Fall has had the same ending since its release in 1956.

But according to United Press, April, 1956, the Bogart character's article originally began "Boxing should be outlawed in the United States if it takes an act of Congress to do it."

That was reshot at Schulberg's request to read "Racketeers in boxing should be outlawed if it takes an act of Congress to do it." And, yes, it was because he was calling for the reform of boxing and the banishment of its ruling criminal element (e.g., Frankie Carbo, Blinky Palermo, Jim Norris), not its outright abolition.

That view was in stark contrast to the film's director, Mark Robson (who also directed Kirk Douglas's starmaking boxing classic "Champion"), who made no attempt to hide his disdain for boxing, in a number of interviews.

reply

hotfriend, great response. thank you.

reply

Mark Robson was right. There is no such thing as a civilized society that allows boxing or any other type of fighting between persons where the intent is to knock out the opponent as a spectator sport.

This does not include pro wrestling which is merely a form of hyper-gymnastics for entertainment combined with overacting.

-----
The Eyes of the City are Mine! Mother Pressman / Anguish (1987)

reply

Greece, Rome, China, . . . Which civilized society do you refer that does not have a legal form of fisticuffs?

reply

"There is no such thing as a civilized society that allows boxing or any other type of fighting between persons where the intent is to knock out the opponent as a spectator sport."

This is one of the silliest statements I've ever read, by far. Is there any society, literally going back to the beginning of civilization, that does not have "fighting between persons" as a spectator sports?

How about martial arts? Or is that OK but boxing isn't? And why is it uncivilized?

Jessica Rabbit
"I'm not bad. I'm just drawn that way."

reply

I'm a lifelong fight fan and could name men who were saved from a life of crime by boxing.

reply

To to mention the incredible feeling of empowerment and self-confidence from having the competence to defend himself and his loved ones. What culture / society can sustain itself without men competent in martial arts?

reply

Why boxing specifically? Aren't people also saved from life of crime by basketball, greco-roman wrestling, creative writing, or other interests that don't involve CTE brain damage?

reply