MovieChat Forums > Jesus Christ Discussion > Probably a Disturbed Con Man or a Hypocr...

Probably a Disturbed Con Man or a Hypocrite SJW


Either a con man like L. Ron Hubbard or a hypocrite adulterer like Martin Luther King

The only advantage that Jesus has over modern controversial figures is that he happened to exist before modern and effective historiographical methods

In other words, most of what we know about him is just passed down word of mouth with low fidelity to historical accuracy

I think he was either a lunatic, a hypocrite, or a marketing fluke

reply

cool story

reply

cool reply

reply

I don't believe Jesus was god. But I do believe he was a Jewish religious reformer. I don't see why atheists need to get hostile about Christianity. John the Baptist presaged Jesus. So there was already an existing Jewish sect of which Jesus emerged as leader.

Do you also believe Buddha and Confucius were con men? Or do you reserve that for Christians?

reply

Christianity is pretty hostile to atheism. One good turn deserves another (I hope I'm using that saying correctly). But yeah, lump in Buddha and Mohammed (not Confucius because he wasn't historically proven to claim to be a prophet or demigod)

All religious prophets were either con men or under a feverish spell of their own influence

Look me in my face and tell me what God's will is. You wouldn't dare. It takes a real asshole to claim that they know it

reply

I'm an atheist. I have no desire to proselytize. But no, you have not shown that Jesus, Buddha and Confucius were con men.

These men were ethical reformers.

In fact, we have great proof that Jesus was a Jewish reformer. He kicked the money lenders out of the temple, i.e. the loan sharks who used the temple to conduct usury and and oppress the poor.

reply

Agree to disagree. They were all hardcore bullshitters

reply

Your assessment is too negative. They lived in a time before science and they were trying to come up with ethical guidelines and theories about the creation of life and the universe.

reply

Perhaps. But perhaps that also shields them from rigorous ethical judgment and they get away with what would otherwise be recognized as exploitation. It goes both ways

Or do you know of a lot of infamous recognized charlatans from those times?

reply

There's no reason to believe that Jesus was insincere. As I said, the strongest piece of evidence in his favor was throwing the loan sharks out of the temple. He lived in a time when the corrupt Pharisees dominated Judaism.

reply

Jesus being an ethical reformer was secondary to his primary purpose.

reply

His primary purpose was to form a cult

reply

Onan claims to be an atheist. yet spreads some of the same dumb shit apologetics do.

https://moviechat.org/nm1832670/Jesus-Christ/620483d8eee6360f2e805085/Loves-Killing-KidsBabies?reply=62a979a81eb05864c97d72f1

when called out he tries to change the subject and muddy the waters

reply

Tbh I was just messing with him and everyone else by starting this thread

I do think it's impossible to know the real nature of the historical Jesus's character, but I also think one can't just take it for granted that he was a good man

I don't even care if he is or isn't an atheist. He seems to admire religion, which I get. To me religion is the world's largest cultural and historical fossil. It reveals a lot about how humans have attempted to make sense of things beyond their comprehension

But there is simply no way to make hard claims about holy figures. Those details are lost in time. You can scour the best historical sources and you will still never truly be able to say whether Jesus was a noble reformer, a nutjob, a crook, or just a mascot for a mass social program

reply

umm haven't been following the recent roe v wade news have you? people in the west are hostile people Christians keep trying to shove their religion down everyones throats.

Jesus is critical and fundamental to Christianity. its not a no true Scottsman to say you cant say you don't need or believe in Jesus and also be a Christian.

Confucius taught philosophy. not a religion that claimed to have all the answers it couldn't possibly know

reply

Uh no, abortion has been legal at the federal level for almost 50 years. And it's still legal in most states. Try again.

And most Christian churches have gone on record as supporting abortion rights.

Confucius and Confucianists worshiped The August Personage of Jade, also known as The Dragon King. 🤣 They also advocated foot binding for woman and infanticide for female babies.

reply

yes I gave on example. theres plently. they are a powerful voting block, as the recent court decision showed.

its been a short time and already its banned in many place https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html

also how does this help the poor person making 8$ an hour who cant drive 200 miles out of state and pay for the procedure. try again. amazing for an "atheist" you sure do parrot all the Christian nonsense.

And most Christian churches have gone on record as supporting abortion rights.


citation please. most Christians are Okay with it. the church positions are another

Confucius and Confucianists worshiped The August Personage of Jade, also known as The Dragon King. 🤣 They also advocated foot binding for woman and infanticide for female babies


yes which has nothing to do with his philosophy that everyone knows him for. when people reference Confucius, they dont reference his personal superstitions and religion. its like claiming the theory of relativity isnt true because Einstein believed in animal sacrifice.


you are soo dumb it hurts.

reply

You're barely worth the conversation. And I bet you have a naked poster of Leonardo DiCaprio on your wall. 🤣

Again, most jurisdictions in the U.S. maintain legal abortion. And the U.K., Germany, Canada, Australia, Sweden and most Western "Christian" nations support abortion rights.

I'll take Christianity over Confucianism any day.

Yes, when Confucianism was the major religion of China, foot binding and female newborn infanticide was approved by the Confucian patriarchal priesthood.

Next!

reply

You're barely worth the conversation. And I bet you have a naked poster of Leonardo DiCaprio on your wall. 🤣


good one. what a fragile mind. you have nothing so its "you are gay!!!!". you are getting obliterated here huh? just like last time.

Again, most jurisdictions in the U.S. maintain legal abortion.


cool story, and? this ahs LITERALLY NOTHING to do with proving christians arent trying to enforce their religious extremism on other. they are. im glad there are enough reasonable people in other states who outnumber them. great. LOL. yes middle class and rich people can leave the state and get abortions. poor people cant though or its extremely hard.

idiot

And the U.K., Germany, Canada, Australia, Sweden and most Western "Christian" nations support abortion rights.


these are christian nations? those countries you mentioned rank in the top 20 as most atheist in the world LOL. idiot

damn for an "atheist" you sure do parrot every single dumb christian talking point dont you? im looking at my countries constitution.... nope nothing about Christianity! christians can go to catholic schools but, oh look at that! public schools are secular! all those countries you mentioned have literally. we have no state religion and theres a separation.

I'll take Christianity over Confucianism any day.

Yes, when Confucianism was the major religion of China, foot binding and female newborn infanticide was approved by the Confucian patriarchal priesthood. so you are comparing a religion 2500 years ago in china to modern Christianity and saying "seeeee look how great it was!!!"


wow buddy. you might be retarded... and what do you think was happening in christian medieval Europe??? sunshine and gumdrops? how about pre christian judaism. yep those slaves were living such great lives. the beating, the being owned, the passed on to the owners kids as property. or how about the abortion concoction the jewish rabbis made when you suspected your wife cheated?

nope I wasnt at all. as I stated twice before. and ill have to do a third time because you are literally a retard. I was talking about how Confucius as the person and his contribution to philosophy, not religion.and just as I can agree with Jesus on philosophical points, the golden rule for example, I dont have to accept all the theological baggage of Jesus. should I clarify it for a 4th time retard :)

reply

No, I didn't say you're gay. I said only an idiot names himself after Leonardo DiCaprio. Nothing against the guy, but what kind of weak star-worshiping fanboy are you?

Fundamentalist Christians are trying to outlaw abortion. Mainstream Protestants are not. Abortion is legal in 95% of European countries.

The official religion of the United Kingdom is Christianity, with the Church of England being the state church. Abortion is legal.

All the European countries have a long history of Christianity. Abortion is legal in 95% of Europe.

Contemporary Christianity is not against legal abortion, only Fundamentalists are.

If you want to talk about slavery:

What does Confucianism say about slavery?

Confucius — the Thinker Who Stubbornly Defends the System of Slavery

Confucius talked about many "virtues," but he excluded the slaves and other enslaved working people from "virtue." As he saw it, the slaves could only take orders and be enslaved, and could never be allowed to know any truth.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/CED1061-193207010225?journalCode=mced19


reply

vs Onan the barbarian LOLLLL. what's that thing about those in glass houses? Actually you did imply it though

And I bet you have a naked poster of Leonardo DiCaprio on your wall. 🤣


damn you aint even man enough to admit it. what a little bitch you are

Nothing against the guy, but what kind of weak star-worshiping fanboy are you?


yes I must worship him............im such a fan boy ive... made maybe one comment on his page. and maybe two on movies here been in. 1 is Django cause im a big Tarantino fan. ive make more comments on Tarantino stuff, and single films, than everything involving leo. combined.. such a fanboy... fuck you are dumb.

Fundamentalist Christians are trying to outlaw abortion. Mainstream Protestants are not. Abortion is legal in 95% of European countries.


you still arent getting it.. are you retard? none of this changes the fact the US evangelicals and christians are a powerful voting bloc trying to enforce their religion. which ive said 3 times now. shit you struggle to read simple posts I see!

Contemporary Christianity is not against legal abortion, only Fundamentalists are.


40% still oppose it


If you want to talk about slavery:


hahahahahahahahhahahh still on about Confucius. a minor point I brought up. omg, you mean, I don agree 100% with what somone said in their entire life and all positions.:0 :0 noooo way!!!!!!

HAHAHHA like the bitch you are. you dodged me talking about

1.dominance of pastsociety and destroying the christian nation lie
2. me saying how even a few US states having fundamental chrsitain laws enforced is bad
3. destroying your nonsense comparison to 500 BCE Chinese society to 2022 AD American society. then ignored all the horrible things these had I brought up.

you are a little bitch and dodger. good one. anyone can see you losing this

reply

No, Patrick Swayze, Confucius is the point. No other religion has the system of respecting individual rights and reforming law to protect individual rights. That's why Christians ended slavery in the West before the Confucianists ended it in China. Oh, wait a second, the Confucianists never ended slavery in China. Neither did the Buddhists. The Communists did.

Mickey Rourke, 66% of Americans support abortion rights. Only a minority oppose them, not even 40%.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2022/06/24/how-americans-really-feel-about-abortion-the-sometimes-surprising-poll-results-as-supreme-court-reportedly-set-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/?sh=7bede7c92f3a

Now suck my dick, Leo.

reply

nope no it wasn't. it was literally my last sentence and a single sentence. but you've latched on to it while avoiding the rest because you are being utterly demolished :)

No other religion has the system of respecting individual rights and reforming law to protect individual rights


LOL PARDON? what religion? the Magna Carta? the leviathan by Hobbes? the social contract by Rousseau? liberalism (libertarianism)? the us constitution? I barely scratched the surface of a long line of POLITICAL THEORY and progress in political thought. not religion you clown.

That's why Christians ended slavery in the West before the Confucianists ended it in China.


LOOOOOOLLL the christians who ended slavery, who argued with CHRISTIANS who used the very same bible, arguably more accurately IMO to justify slavery. because as we know the bible not only allows but condones slavery :) hahah I love when points backfire! and look the little clowns onto confucianism like I give a fuck about china you dumb fuck. how fukcing stupid are you?


Mickey Rourke, 66% of Americans support abortion rights. Only a minority oppose them, not even 40%.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2022/06/24/how-americans-really-feel-about-abortion-the-sometimes-surprising-poll-results-as-supreme-court-reportedly-set-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/?sh=7bede7c92f3a


wow ill have to explain for a 5th time. since the little retard cant read :). yes im glad there are enough reasonable people to overrule these nutters largely. it didnt stop the Supreme Court form siding with them, or multiple states enacting their own anti abortion laws. 1 is 1 too many. your point proves fuck all. it supports me. 34% re still wackjob christian sharia law nuts who are thankfully partly, albeit not completely, outvoted and restrained by the other 56%

but hey, write it again. im guessing ill have to explain for a 6th time since you are a fucking retard. were your dropped or your mom drank a lot during pregnancy?

I love how two of your points literally supported mine. your till haven't addressed points 1-3 I mentioned you dodged :) anyone reading this is seeing how desperate you are. aww what little loser

reply

No one actually reads the 4 Gospels.

So, there were 5 differing Jewish Second Temple sects (Sadducees, Essenes, Pharisees, Zealots and Samaritans). Jesus actually hangs out with members of each sect and even takes a few philosophical points from each of them.

Today, this would be like if Jesus hung out with radical republicans, democrats, atheists, catholics, protestants, etc. Which would not make much sense...

So who on earth would write that about Jesus hanging out with all these different sect members? It's quite strange. Indeed, the Gospels have not been well researched/studied by people.

reply