MovieChat Forums > Emma Watson Discussion > J.K. Rowling Hits Out at Daniel Radcliff...

J.K. Rowling Hits Out at Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson Over Their Trans Rights Support: They Can 'Save Their Apologies'

posted 2 months ago by Evoken (1271)
15 replies | jump to latest

J.K. Rowling Hits Out at Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson Over Their Trans Rights Support: They Can 'Save Their Apologies'

The 'Harry Potter' stars previously spoke out in support of trans rights following comments made by series author Rowling

Controversial author J.K. Rowling is speaking out against her former Harry Potter stars Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson.

In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter) Wednesday, April 10, the fantasy book series' author — who has previously been criticized for anti-transgender comments, as well as her support for others with transphobic views — shared a recent independent review "of the medical evidence for transitioning children."

One follower responded to her on X, "Just waiting for Dan and Emma to give you a very public apology ... safe in the knowledge that you will forgive them ... " (Neither Radcliffe, 34, nor Watson, 33, have spoken out about their views on medical transitioning of children.)

"Not safe, I'm afraid," Rowling said. "Celebs who cosied up to a movement intent on eroding women's hard-won rights and who used their platforms to cheer on the transitioning of minors can save their apologies for traumatised detransitioners and vulnerable women reliant on single sex spaces."

Reps for Radcliffe and Watson did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for comment on Thursday, April 11.

https://people.com/jk-rowling-wont-forgive-daniel-radcliffe-emma-watson-for-trans-rights-comments-8630039

[–] Kowalski (63169) 2 months ago

THAT LADY IS A NUT.

[–] jk90us (5736) 2 months ago

Why? Because she supports women and doesn’t want her gender eroded?

Why do you hate women? Actual women?

These days it’s like the Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

The alphabet mafia is hellbent on overrunning society by replacing actual men and women with facsimiles.

Why are you not terrified and outraged?

[–] Kowalski (63169) 2 months ago

YOU ARE ALSO A NUT.🫡

[–] jk90us (5736) 2 months ago

For defending women? 😳

[–] Kowalski (63169) 2 months ago

FOR THINKING WOMEN NEED YOUR DEFENSE...FOR CONFUSING MUDSLINGING AND RAMPANT NEGATIVITY FOR DEFENSE.

[–] Hydracubus (791) 2 months ago

Just stop

[–] Kowalski (63169) 2 months ago

THAT IS HOW IT HAS BEEN FOR 11 DAYS,WEIRDO.

[–] Hydracubus (791) 2 months ago

I was right the last time, you are a special needs kid.

[–] Kowalski (63169) 2 months ago

SO...YOU MESSAGED ME TO SAY STOP AND DROP AN INSULT?...DUDE...GET A LIFE.

[–] Hydracubus (791) 2 months ago

I messaged you because your original post is an oxymoron...and also the fact that every post you make looks like it was typed by someone dropped on their head.

If you can't find the hypocrisy in what you originally posted, please kindly block me and I'll do the same. I just can't stand your ilk. You're not trolling, you just don't know your own asshole from your elbow. As a result society collapses because we are expected to cater to and roleplay with people like you and the He-she critics of Rowling.

Peace out and blocked.

[–] Kowalski (63169) 2 months ago

SO...YOU ARE THE TROLL...SUCH A BRIEF INTERACTION...ONE THAT YOU STARTED TOO...I JST HAVE ONE QUESTION....WHAT BRAND TAMPONS ARE YOU USING THESE DAYS?

[–] jk90us (5736) 2 months ago

Good for her!!!

[–] Hydracubus (791) 2 months ago

J.K. Rowling has more spine than most celebs in Britain. I hope they put her on the back of their money.

[–] maximmm (3138) 6 days ago

true

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12847) 6 days ago

Those two owe their fame and fortune to her, and yet they chose to jump on the tranny bandwagon and throw her under the bus. I'm not surprised she wouldn't accept any apologies from them, because she would know they didn't mean it.