[deleted]


[deleted]


Corrupt, and on the take!


Fixed that for ya. 😉

reply

[deleted]

Murderer. Now add Seth Rich to her crimes.

reply

[deleted]

On the take is corrupt. I'm not sure how your making a distinction. She wants money(on the take) but needs power to maintain it.

Trump is lazy and on the take. He wants money but seems to regret that he actually won the presidency. If he had it his way he would have lost the election and let a democrat take the whitehouse while he starts his own news network. Its like danm thats the guy the GOP got stuck with. America was doomed to loose this election regardless of which candidate won.

reply

[deleted]

Yes. If we take disregard for the law to be the definition of corrupt. Trump may be corrupt too but he seems to be covering his tracks better.

reply


Both. She is also mean, vindictive, a cheat, a liar, a thief, and quite possibly an accessory to murder. She's a horrible excuse for a human being. Done. Solved that one for you.



😎

reply

All you have to do is look at how the donations to the Clinton Foundation have dried up since she's out of power. It's obvious to anyone with at least half a brain that she was selling influence.

Also, next time you get subpoenaed for something, just destroy it and see what happens to you. You'll find out very quickly how different the justice systems works when it's not dealing with a Clinton.

reply


Sort of the same thing.


😎

reply

[deleted]


The short answer would be yes. Of course a lot of politicians are both.


😎

reply

[deleted]