MovieChat Forums > Luffy > Replies
Luffy's Replies
Maybe by statuesque you mean chiselled? Carrie Fisher was immensely beautiful in the 70s.
Haha! Someone needs to make that movie.
Yes, I would rather watch a romcom between He man and She Ra.
You're right. Spielberg is mentioned in the same breath as Cronenberg, De Palma, Wes Craven and so on.
That rating is hardly enforced outside of its theatrical release.
Don't worry, by the time the Australian girls' nipples turn back to their original Aryan pink, your family line will be phased out due to natural selection.
The Marine Biologist.
Notice that you never mention RT in your little rant. It wouldn't be okay if you learned something from a RT critic.
Right. Did you know that the first enemies to lovers trope in history happened when raging hordes of mongols bred Russian and Ukrainian women like cattle? The same Ukrainians you seem to find so hot. Guess beggars can't be choosers.
If they wanted to highlight India's darker traditions, they should have shown thugs strangle people, or set up the special effects for a Sati burning. The unfortunate explanation is that they needed to entertain kids with yucky gastronomy and also provide chuckles for relatively easily pleased people.
So?
I never watched ToD more than once.
That is cool. Feel free to coin a new latin sounding name, nevertheless. It's not against the rules.
I think you're thinking of Monique.
You should not let its bland visuals deter you from seeing it. Great movie.
Whoever made Groundhog Day.
Say what you will about him, he could organise a party.
Yes.
I absolutely loved this movie.
They educate the students just enough for them to qualify as political activists in prison, but not enough to actually make them be significant. Smart thinking.
The Lundgren movie had a small budget. This one - don't know the studio making it - must have been assigned a smaller budget due to the 'surprise' flops of last year's big movies.