MovieChat Forums > jam920
jam920 (24)
Posts
Replies
More or less true, I guess as a society we do not learn from the past then
Orwell was a social democrat and a old school one at that. The SD's and communist were often rivals and Orwell wrote 1984 and Animal Farm based on his view of the Marxist-Leninist. That "true" communism was not achieved or if one believes the US is one of the most evil nations in the history on earth does not change what Orwell's motivations for those books were.
Nobody could argue that the US has manipulated governments and has often failed to live up to ideals it even preaches to other nations. You ruled out the Soviet Union as living up to the ideals of either socialism or truly hoping to reach communism. There are smaller countries like the obvious examples in Scandinavia that have strong social programs but are not socialist. Since they have a capitalist free market, the government does not own the means of production. Are there any nations or societies, capitalist, socialist, autocrat, republic etc. that you feel has lived up to its ideals?
Orwell's book 1984 speaks to totalitarianism, but many interpret as a warning of fascism but really it spoke to the Marxist-Leninist regime like the Soviet Union at the time. Sure there are similarities between the two ideologies. I always thought the political spectrum described as circle makes the most sense with Communism and Fascism side by side on the extreme halves of the circle. That is what is interesting about 1984 because both the left and the right use Orwell's words against one another whenever both drift closer to their extremes.
I agree that we can assume that Himmler position is safe, I am sure he would have already killed off or arrested anyone that was a threat. It was easy to do, you could accuse someone of anything in Nazi Germany if you held the power. I doubt even when Himmler was RFSS he was that hands on to point of calling secret agents in the field. Being at the Year Zero event makes sense though, but it just seems they have Himmler in every scene that involves the American Reich portion of the show.
I might have missed something, what is the connection to Trump in the show? Or is this just general comparison. If Trump were truly like the Nazis he would be finding ways to change the constitution to give himself and his party more control. I get the Trump opposition but to compare a government that killed millions of people to a guy whose immigration or tax policies may not be one's liking seem a little stretch.
What if people from different ends of spectrum both believe they are working towards the betterment of society, yet sometime they are and sometimes they are not.
Socialism could perhaps be more democratic, but democracy just means the majority rules but does not guarantee freedom. The majority government could make all other parties illegal.
That is not to say there are not flaws with capitalism, but hard to have a free society without a free market. This is a problem for socialist or communist societies. Or Fascism where the state still gets to pick favorites in the marketplace. The crony capitalism in the US market probably closer resembles this at times.
Werner von Braun as a figure so close to the US space program might have made him less of a choice. They did attach Werner Heisenberg to the atomic bomb to the story calling it a "Heisenberg device". Which makes sense since he did work on their atomic program.
Although I also agree slavery was and is morally wrong, I am not taking a side in the Civil War; that has already been decided and was long over before I was born. I am only pointing out that they were very partisan at that time and all sides felt they were right and feared the other. I see the attitudes (not as much the causes) today when it comes to politics and economics as much more similar to that era, than different.
When you say both sides, do you mean Democrat v. Republican, Liberal v. Conservative, Socialist V. Capitalist? I would only suggest that they are equal because they are led by human beings and because of that are flawed by nature and have overstepped the moral boundaries to achieve their goals at some point and will do so again.
Sorry I missed your reply from a few days ago.
Like you, I of course have my own partisan beliefs, just as everyone does today or in the past. For example the different groups leading up to the Civil War both in the North and the South were also partisan. They certainly felt different groups were conspiring against their way of life and what their conception of America was.
Even if you believe Trump supporters are not personally conspiring against Democrats, but if you believe they are being lied to than you at least believe they are tools to a bigger conspiracy against those that view things differently than they do, and want to deprive them of power. Today this seems to be the gist of the message I hear from both sides.
But is the news media monolithic today? I am not sure I follow you there, at least their views do not seem that way. I would think maybe from the 1960s-80s during the golden age of broadcast news was probably when that adjective might more closely be applied to some degree.
That propaganda or myth building being done for Trump is not new, either today or for any one side of the political spectrum. As for Trump, I am not sure if a more public person has been elected to the presidency, certainly not in the modern age. One could debate on how much investigation into him is needed, but I think it would be hard to say he has not been investigated, at least that is my perception.
Over the course of history, if you look at the struggles over Republic-ism vs Monarchy, capitalism vs socialism you can see the same repetitive behaviors. The contrast how people view the world maybe best expressed by the countering views of Hobbs and Locke and has been forever.
It all depends. It seems today if someone is of a certain race and especially also of a certain gender they can be automatically assumed guilty of anything because of the real or even perceived crimes people of the same race and gender had done in the past.
These are excellent points, many I wondered about as well.
I know the Nazis have super duper sonic aircraft and Himmler can zip back and forth, but he does seem pretty tied up in things he should have other people handling.
Jazz or swing music was looked down on at least officially. Only rational I can think of is, perhaps the American national socialist were more tolerant, and or because it such a part of American culture it was tolerated more in the American part of the Reich. Still at the official party for eliminating American history it still seems a strange choice.
I agree bribing and blackmail would make sense. Although to hold this over Smith it could be easily used against him. Before the war two prominent Generals on the German High command were brought down by rumor and innuendo. Still if Himmler sees Smith as so important I think he could make sure his daughters get a pass, just as he did with the charges against him by Rockwell.
I think they used Mengele because he is more commonly known and infamous for conducting experiments on people, but was not a physicist. Someone did suggest maybe in the MITC world he was a physicist and did not go into the medical field.
The big Nazi machine at the end, really went off the rails for me. As the heroes spy on things through an air vent, while Himmler overseas his doomsday machine like some kind James Bond villain.
View all replies >