MovieChat Forums > Hereditary (2018) Discussion > Rosemary’s Grandbaby

Rosemary’s Grandbaby


This was a very good modern horror, way above the standard dreck we get now.

It mainly drew from Rosemary’s Baby but tried to blend it with the visceral nastiness and family breakdown trauma of The Exorcist. The result is a commendable effort but by blending those two films it dilutes itself from both ends.

For instance, the strongest aspect of Hereditary was the Joan character - she seems so supportive and understanding of Annie’s grief yet a little too keen on the seance… then you find out she is pure evil, throwing a family into a meat grinder for her Satanic cultish desires. Reflecting on how sweet she seemed initially is deeply disturbing, as is remembering the creepy smiles and apparent friendliness of other characters we later learn were cult members. RB made this the main focus - the human evil, but here it gets swept aside in favour of more scary demonic stuff.

The demonic stuff was well handled, but doesn’t reach the gut-wrenching depths of The Exorcist, where a young girl jams a crucifix into her bloodied genitals and shoves her mother’s face into the mess. If RB and Ex are potent single malts, Hereditary is a weak blend, but still does the job.

Also, the backstory was rather convoluted, with a grandmother failing to raise the demon within her own children, it partially inhabiting the granddaughter, but ultimately was aiming for the grandson. It’s like the film was trying to hide its obvious debt to RB that it ended up almost entirely shrouding a circuitous backstory except for blink and you’ll miss them clues - as if the filmmaker knew some autistic on YouTube would handle the explanation for you later on.

RB felt much more streamlined, whereas this darted around from (brilliantly acted) family drama, to demonic scares, to sleepwalking, to the cult, to doll-house imagery (I guess the symbolism was to show how this family is being puppeteered all along like a child playing with dolls but it’s quite on-the-nose to have that as Annie’s literal job).

I liked not knowing where it was all going, but when it got there it felt less than the sum of its parts, like the non-cult stuff was just red herrings rather than essential connective tissue to a final reveal in which everything makes sense (as in Identity).

Hereditary is a gruelling watch, you’re basically witnessing a family slowly being tortured and killed for two hours, and there doesn’t seem to be any possibility of escape, since they are puppeteered every step of the way. The genius of RB was that she took the final step, the cult knew her maternal instincts would prevail, there was a terrifying psychological and emotional truth to its core. Hereditary is like watching a sack of kittens drown.

All that said, the film was expertly directed and Ari Aster is one-to-watch for sure. Most horrors today are lazy boo-scares, this was all about performances, subtlety and atmosphere. I look forward to his next projects.




reply

Good review. There's not a whole lot of that here in moviechat. It's mostly a lot of whining and/or bickering or hyperbole regarding how bad something is. But it's good to see a genuine movie lover expressing a genuine opinion in good faith

I really loved the movie, but that's due in part because Horror has been so bad (IMO) these past several years. And you are right about some of its flaws, but comparing it to Rosemary's Baby so much seems a little unfair considering that RB has got to be like in the Top 5, or even 3, Horror movies of all time. I understand the reason for the comparisons, because Hereditary certainly takes much inspiration from RB. But if the film had been TOO much like RB then people would be complaining that it was a rip-off. It has differences that range from pacing (as you said, much less streamlined) to its tone (RB has satirical elements whereas Hereditary is much more somber)

I agree that the plot was pretty convoluted. I was totally taken by surprise at the ending because I had missed many of the clues. I don't really like the idea that this demon preferred a male host but was put into the wrong host. As a plot point, it is very clunky. But I do admit that it was effective in setting up some good scares. The little girl, even though she only appears for a relatively brief amount of time, manages to come across as pretty creepy. But because she's sort of an oddball I also felt sympathy for her, and so when she was decapitated I was totally shocked

reply


And I believe that Ira Levin and Ari Aster had two fundamentally different goals in mind when writing their respective stories. I've read on how Levin came up with his idea and have read the book, so it is pretty clear that Levin wants YOU, the viewer, to be fully aware of what's happening. The Horror comes from watching this poor innocent naive girl be manipulated by everyone around her

In Hereditary, Aster wants the ending to shock you. It's part of the reason for the title. I went into the movie knowing very little aside from the title, and I assumed it would involve some sort of scientific or medical plot. So I don't think Aster hid all those details just to avoid comparisons to RB, I think he mainly did it so that the ending would genuinely shock you. I mean, it's not until Annie finds the box of her mother's belongings that we discover that the story is about a Satanic cult, and that's almost 2 hours into the movie. In RB you really ought to have a good idea about what's happening when you see the the naked old people surrounding a drugged Rosemary

And even after you learn that the story is about a Satanic cult in Hereditary, you certainly wouldn't immediately guess that you would be seeing a scene where the protagonist ends up possessed, clinging to the ceiling and then decapitating herself

reply

Excellent analysis which identifies family trauma and the failure to process it as the true demon of the piece: https://youtu.be/rE85q9P4RjY

reply