MovieChat Forums > A Quiet Place (2018) Discussion > Do the writers think we're idiots?

Do the writers think we're idiots?


Everybody knows that walking barefoot is quite noisy. The process of putting down and removing bare feet from the floor creates a distinct sound. Especially on wooden floors, where it's next to impossible to be quiet when barefoot. So why have the characters walking around barefoot on wooden floors? A certain suspension of disbelief is always to be expected in any film, but do the writers seriously expect us to pretend that we aren't aware that bare feet makes a sound?

Because you know what makes much less noise than walking barefoot? WEARING SOCKS! Furry slippers or even sneakers will also make much less noise when touching the ground. So why not have all the characters wearing thick socks? Heck, they should probably be wearing triple pairs of socks, just to be extra protected!

Also: Why the hell have the characters live in a wooden house, filled with stuff that can fall onto the floor at any moment? There's even a scene where the mother straightens a picture hanging on the friggin wall! WHY?

If they really wanted to make us believe the premise, then the first thing any sane person would do, would be to move into a building with thick concrete walls, and then put PADDING ON EVERYTHING! There should have been thick carpets and pillows fastened to the walls. Every fork and plate and screwdriver would have a thick layer of tape around it, to dampen any sound should it fall to the ground. And every goddamn picture would be taken down from the walls!

Additionally: Why the hell didn't they set up a few noise-makers around the place? If these monsters only go after sound, it would be super easy to distract them, by putting up a bunch of decoys around the house. For example, you could place a few cans out in the yard and tie them up with a string that you could pull from within the house at any time.

I mean... COME ON!

reply

Yeah, I agree with your points.

It can be debated how these creatures devastated the world at large. Most of their 'advantages' could be countered with appropriate military and technological measures. The counter-argument is that the sheer number of them, combined with the logistics of organizing a co-ordinated defence, gave them the edge, even if temporarily.

Within the confines of THIS story though, yeah, there were so many poorly thought out ideas by the writers. Not sure why the critics were tripping over themselves to praise this movie. They must spend so much time in front of a keyboard that they have no idea how the real world works, e.g. how stairs are actually built...

reply

Yeah, there are quite a few gaping holes in the movie - particularly if you look into it granularly - but what bothered me the most was why they would have a four-year-old kid hike behind the rest of them? He should have been in the middle or in front so they could keep an eye on him. Ideally, one parent should have in front of the kids and the other at the back. Common sense!

reply

These plots of some of the new horror movies are ridiculous.
They come up with these idiotic ideas, and then they miss obvious solutions for them in order to do jump out jokes with the camera. Can't watch that crap anymore.

reply