I also had a slight problem with that scene, he's shooting at those people in complete random, not knowing who they are or if they're even guilty of his crime, but with more thought, the way I see it; nobody is a good guy in this movie. Everyone wants to get rich and he basically gets screwed over and so he resorts to what he's very good at.
There's a line in the movie, yes it's after he wipes out the entire floor, when he's talking to the CEO; something along the lines of: survival of the fittest and strong versus weak. They use this as a metaphor for their actions, he now plays the same game.
Survival of the fittest doesn't have rules and that also includes morality and equality. His wife kills herself by indirect actions of those people, all greedy and only thinking about themselves. From all directions, to greedy insurance companies to investors. They all end up killing people without knowing anything about them on a daily basis. Without those employees working for those companies, propping it up and instead if they refuse, none of it would exist. The difference is, they don't use a gun and they don't walk into the office with it. So what about them? People need to be accountable or more Hilters will keep coming. I'm not saying wiping an entire floor of people is justified, but also instead of asking for morality from Jim, people inside the office should be also be put to the same morality rules.
I think I understand why he did it, in the sense of this topic talking about what's right or wrong, but mostly I think he's just lost it due to his wife committing suicide. This isn't a movie about a hero who wants to fight the system, he's just doing it for revenge.
He was working at a company that guards and transfers money. Money that probably belongs to the same guys he despises. Just before those scenes, he meets his broker. His broker is all rich again and trying to get him to invest. So I think he just assumes that they're all the same, and wants to take revenge on him too. He has a broker to begin with.. Anyone who has a broker that ends up screwing them either got conned or they only cared about profit, which seems to be the case when all he remembers is a guaranteed 8% return.
reply
share