Overrated
Wow I can't see the love for this movie, it's an entertaining action. But it's a very generic movie... Overrated in my opinion
Wow I can't see the love for this movie, it's an entertaining action. But it's a very generic movie... Overrated in my opinion
That''s what makes a horse race. Differing opinions. I happened to love Guardians and dislike the Dark Knight trilogy. Other people feel different.
In the kingdom of the blind, you're the village idiot.
Yuuuuuup! I'm with you.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Better than bvs
shareAs a whole yes, but I feel like BvS is film while Gotg is entertainment
shareThen BvS is lousy film and GoG is great entertainment.
shareI feel like BvS is film while Gotg is entertainmentDumbest. Statement. Ever. Newsflash: all films are entertainment, or are supposed to be. They're BOTH films. They were released in theaters, they tell a story within the time constraints of a film's running time, and they were made by profession filmmakers. They are both films. One's entertaining, and the other is depressing.
Don't know why this is such a "dumb" statement... Some people refer to "film" as a specific type - like artistically so. For some people David Lynch is "film" and Hitchcock is "entertainment." Yes, both are essentially "films," but some people - like me - compartmentalize "film" as being more artistic and "movies" as being more entertaining. OF COURSE they are both films, but some people just like to classify things in different ways.
Who are you to judge, especially when theatre/film crit teaches us to compartmentalize/classify in such a way?
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus.
--Sayid
People who do that are morons, and no, I don't care if I just offended you.
I will judge because I have a free that hasn't been programmed by film snobs and I can decide on my own how I label films. All films are films, and also, anyone who refers to Lynch as "film" and Hitchcock as "entertainment" is a morn, and no, I won't take that back.
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf
I'm not offended I just think your worldview is seriously whacked and narrow-minded.
Just because I draw on what I've learned in college doesn't mean I've been programmed. I too am a free mind and I CHOOSE to follow that particular option that has been taught to me. Difference between us is I don't disparage a person who chooses not too. I recognize that there are more outlooks than my own and accept that other people think differently.
But why should we even argue? You want to talk about giving in to programming, you seem so inured of the Internet message board way of life, ready to pick a fight with your "I don't care if I offend you" attitude when there was nothing to argue about in the first place. We both apparently enjoyed GotG but rather than celebrate that we should be at each other's throats?
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus.
--Sayid
How exactly? Is it because I don't think that films that intended to entertain first and foremost are inherently inferior to "deeper" films? Look, pal, its been proven that after a long day of hard work and stress that people need to unwind and relax. Goofy, fun movies are one way to do that if, especially if you're too tired for anything else. So, yes, they DO have value. I know that after a long day of putting up with disgruntle customers who blame me for things I had no control over, I like, no, NEED to unwind and laugh. So don't give me that crap about how I'm narrow minded, because I'm not. You're the narrow minded one, if anyone is, since you seem to buy into the idea that films have to comment on the human condition or some crap we've seen a million times to be looked at as film.
Dude, I've also been to college, and in fact, been done with it for years. I also studied film, and unlike you, I didn't come out of as some wannabe film critic. Film critics have been proven to be utterly irrelevant, anyway.
Oh, I'm not inured to the internet. I'm just tired of people not seeing the value in films that choose to entertain instead of inanely preaching to us just to make "intellectuals" feel smart, because they mistakenly think they've just witnessed something profound. I'm arguing with you, because you're taking the side of the guy who's basically said that Guardians has less value because its aim was entertain instead of hit us over the head with some message we were already aware of.
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf
Is it because I don't think that films that intended to entertain first and foremost are inherently inferior to "deeper" films?
Look, pal, its been proven that after a long day of hard work and stress that people need to unwind and relax. Goofy, fun movies are one way to do that if, especially if you're too tired for anything else. So, yes, they DO have value.
I know that after a long day of putting up with disgruntle customers who blame me for things I had no control over, I like, no, NEED to unwind and laugh.
So don't give me that crap about how I'm narrow minded, because I'm not. You're the narrow minded one, if anyone is, since you seem to buy into the idea that films have to comment on the human condition or some crap we've seen a million times to be looked at as film.
Dude, I've also been to college, and in fact, been done with it for years. I also studied film, and unlike you, I didn't come out of as some wannabe film critic.
I'm arguing with you, because you're taking the side of the guy who's basically said that Guardians has less value because its aim was entertain instead of hit us over the head with some message we were already aware of.
If you want to have a discussion about the subject at hand, I did find BvS to be an excellent film with a little bit deeper or more layered quality to it than Guardians which is to be honest pretty straightforward in its intent.I'm sorry, but I can't get past this comment and it certainly damages my ability to take your seriously. No. Just no. BvS is a horrible film without a proper plot structure that is needlessly dark and bleak when it has no business being so. It makes the World's Greatest Detective into an easily led lunkhead and turns the iconic Superman into a moping sadsack. It forced roughly half a dozen different stories together into a blender and hit the switch without a single thought about how they relate to each other or are different from each other. Luthor was an annoying comic relief character they tried to make into a villain and they had no business killing off Superman so soon.
Dude you have some serious anger issues. You have a difference of opinion and I don't think any less of you just because you didn't appreciate or enjoy a movie I did yet you - knowing next to nothing about me besides what I've written here immediately dismiss me because of a differing point of view over a f--king movie. This is what I'm talking about when I say narrow-minded. Whatever, I don't need your approval, I like what I like and make no apologies. Done with you
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus.
--Sayid
Whatever. I never wanted to have this conversation, anyway.
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf
Could've fooled everyone by the argumentative diatribe between you two. It's just a movie. Everyone is different, ergo has different opinions on everything. That's life.
shareThank you. A brilliant reply.
shareWatch "Lost Weekend" if you think all films are about entertainment. Many films exist to make a point, not to entertain. Smart enough comment for you?
shareMost films do have a point, but most of them also exist to entertain. Sorry, but that is the truth.
"All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you." -Gandalf
no. BvS makes no sense, the characters have no weight to them. GotG is played for laughs but all the character arcs make sense
I'm a contradiction
I'd amend this to say "I felt like BvS wanted to be a film, while GOTG was content being great entertainment."
I actually like BvS just fine, but it wasn't nearly as successful being what it wanted to be as GOTG was.
-------------------------
I have meddled with the primal forces of nature and I will atone.
It is so much better than BvS that you cannot even compare them.
GO SIXERS!!!
Phillies
Fly Eagles Fly
[deleted]
[deleted]
Waaaay better. Unlike BvS I actually wanted to go see it a few more times but couldn't
shareMost fun I've had watching a Marvel film this one. Absolutely loved it
shareAgree 100% with TC. Fun, but extremely generic.
shareThis film is lame. Whole bunch of CGI with a weak story. Over hyped piece of crap.
shareWell not overrated !!! its the BEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE EVER !! didnt u see the peter quill dance the *beep* out of Ronan. , real action. ,.
shareBEST COMIC BOOK MOVIE EVER !!
After reviewing your list I noticed that the only and highest (10) rated movie was Brave heart the problem was that you also gave Force Awakens a (1) but Snake eyes, Face Off a (7). SO arguing film taste became pointless. Really Face Off!!
shareThere are some things that are original like the casette player and the characters and many things in general but the overall story is quite boring. It is made for "special" tastes.
shareI agree....movie was very mediocre. One dimensional and unimaginative characters and a storyline we saw a thousand times before.
share