MovieChat Forums > Napoleon (2023) Discussion > "Napoleon" -- The Wikipedia Movie -- And...

"Napoleon" -- The Wikipedia Movie -- And a Good One (Minor Spoilers)


(aka ecarle.)

23 years ago in the year 2000 (you know, a new century?) Joaquin Phoenix took a "straight villain" role in Gladiator, the Best Picture of 2000 that got Russell Crowe an Oscar and cemented his promise from LA Confidential(the next year, Crowe would front Ron Howard's A Beautiful Mind, which also won Best Picture..)

The director of Gladiator was Ridley Scott. 23 years later, Joaquin Phoenix is heading(not supporting) a Ridley Scott film --and Joaquin has a Best Actor Oscar all his own.

Its Napoleon and I guess the reviews aren't too good and the awards shows are ignoring it so far and...I liked it. Liked it for the VERY AMUSING movie that it is.

As has been noted elsehwere, the battle scenes in this movie are great -- a mix of old-fashioned battle grandeur and new-fashioned action.

The connecting tissue is...too quick? too shallow? too "once over lightly?" Scott says he has a 4 and a half hour version ready for Apple -- but I say this two and half hour show was FINE. Fast. Funny.

Its like reading a Wikipedia page summary of Napoleon's life and career as fast as you can. You get EVERY relevant plot point -- if only for a few minutes and then -- on to the next battle.

Some quick examples:

The movie opens with two major historical events from the French Revolution:

ONE: The elegant and noble Marie Antoinette gets her head chopped off.
TWO: The leader of the "Reign of Terror"-- Robespierre, gets overthrown and sent off to get HIS head chopped off.

Entire sequence takes about five minutes. "Done and done":

When the lovely Marie lost her head I was reminded of a thought I've always had: versus such execution methods as the electric chair, the gas chamber, a firing squad(what if vitals are MISSED?) and lethal injection -- isn't the guillotine the most QUICK and PAINLESS one available? The witnesses may be grossed out -- and you have to deal with that HEAD but..quick. As the French cop says to murder suspects Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn in Charade(1963): "I"ve always imagined that the subject of executiion by guillotine feels only a slight tingline sensation at the badk of their neck. I hope you never have a chance to find out.

In the sixties, after the Aurora toy model company had exhausted its "Universal monsters" series of glue-together models(Frankenstein, Dracula, The Wolf Man on down to The Phantom of the Opera) they moved on to "horror scenes." One was "victim on the guillotine." I made that model and had fun chopping off the little model man's head. Those were the days.

Robespierre:

There is supposedly a good movie called "Reign of Terror" from the forties, starring Bob Cummings...but don't we have any BETTER such movies. Robespierre was a scary dude.

And here is his exit in Napoleon(paraphrased):

Robespierre: Yo...how cool we chopped off Marie's head. Who's next?
Rebellious guy: How about YOU, Robespierre? You've got too big a head to begin with.
Robepsierre: Uh oh.
(Chase ensues. Robespierre shoots himself in the cheek but not fatally.)
Rebellious guy: Sorry robesie...you missed. Off to the guillotine.

And.. SCENE.

Next example:

Napoleon divorces Josephine because she can't give him an heir.

Young woman is brought to Napoleon
Aide: Here you go, Napoleon..this is your new bride or something. Go try to make babies, eh?

Two minutes later, new scene

Aide: Good news - your new bride(or something) is pregnant.

Two minutes later, new scene:

Napoleon is presented with his baby.

And...SCENE.

One more.

Napoleon is exiled to Elba.

One two-minute shot of Napoleon sitting on a rock looking out to sea.

Next shot: Napoleon and his men board a vessel.
Napoleon: (To Captain) We are taking your ship. Don't make trouble, I'll let you live. Take me to Paris.

And...SCENE.

I LOVED this. I felt like I was scanning a Wikipedia article before having to turn in a book report. Marie dead. Got it. Robespierre dead. Got it. Woman married, pregnant, baby...got it.
Exile in Elba. Escape from Elba. Got it.

CONT

reply

When it was all over , I asked myself: why can't MORE historical epics cut to the chase like that? All that boring "lead up and lead out" simply wasn't necessary. I got the Cliff Notes gist.

And this allowed Ridley Scott to do his MAIN thing. Battles. Great big violent bloody battles. There is a great "Hitchcock frisson" when an army is crossing a snowy plain and one solider falls on the snow, rubs it with his hand...and realizes he is on ICE. An icy LAKE. Napoleon orders cannonballs fired and the lake turns to water...men AND horses(CGI I hope) drown. It reminded me of the "unleash hell" assault from Gladiator.

Rupert Everett shows up at the end as Lord Wellington at Waterloo. This was the guy who played Julia Roberts gay best friend in "My Best Friend's Wedding." (But he wasn't THAT best friend.) The famous Christopher Pllummer played Wellington(opposite Rod Steiger's Nappy) in 1971's Waterloo. Everett barely has anything to do...and he certainly aged since that Julia movie. I didn't recognize him at first.

I've noted recently that I can walk out of a movie really loving it -- for now - and considering it a favorite of the year when years from now, it won't be.

I felt that GOOD about "Napoleon." A heaping helping of fast food history and some REALLY good battle sequences and out of the theater an hour sooner than at Killers of the Flower Moon. I don't feel that I NEED to see the 4 and a half hour version, but I guess maybe I will some day.

And oh: a few nice sex scenes between Napoleon and Josephine. As with Oppenheimer, the makers did not neglect the carnal urges of their famous men. Sex scenes are few and far between these days. Points to Nappy and Oppy (and their women) for showing that side of the story. Briefly.

reply

Great review and very good points! On another note: I did love the rapid *slap slap slap slap slap* parts XD

reply

Agree. I know a little about Napoleon but am not an expert and I was never confused during the movie. We didn't need a bunch of exposition of old men pointing at maps like all the history nerds apparently wanted.

Phoenix and Kirby were both doing excellent character work (regardless of how much like the real people they were) and the battle scenes and aesthetic were majestic. Not sure what isn't to like here. Was my favorite of the year.

reply

I thought it was pretty good too. Nothing perfect but I enjoyed it and thought it was interesting characterization (especially Josephine) and great action. Who could ask for more?

reply

Definitely don't get why we have people simultaneously complaining that it wasn't comprehensive enough and that it was a "wikipedia entry" of a movie. Pick one of those and run with it guys. Just feels like people had their knives ready for this for some reason and are making up criticisms on the fly.

reply