MovieChat Forums > Legion (2010) Discussion > Lucifer was missing in action in this

Lucifer was missing in action in this

posted 10 years ago by Iberian_Wolf
3 replies | jump to latest

so I finaly watched this... without high hopes or anything, mostly out of curiosity.

it was entertaining... although they should had made it much better, sometimes it seemed rushed.

anyway, without knowing anything about this movie I was waiting for a Lucifer role in it, since Michael basicaly did the same thing, he rebeld agains god's will... so maybe an advice from the Devil himself could be in order...or a rant, an atempt to make Michael join his ranks...

anyway, the ending was lame and overused it reminds me of Planet Terror, Terminator, Dogma etc where the girl survives with the hope for humanity in her hands or womb.

I gave it 6 for being able to tell an entertaining story inside a house but in reality it deserved a 5 for ubber cheesness and lame ending... lol
The Rule of Two is a hoax to fool the Jedi

[–] scanner329 8 years ago

Rebelled.

[–] db20db (16228) 5 years ago

I watched it out of a boring lack of anything else available. It was worse than I anticipated. I usually don't rant negatively about a movie but this was garbage. It was as if the premise came right out of Bizarro World with the supposed screenwriter tripping on acid. I found it incredulous that reputable actors such as Dennis Quaid and Charles S. Dutton actually participated in it.

[–] Strazdas (2328) 4 years ago

Lucifer rebelled and was cast out. He ceased being an angel and thus would have no hand in such plans by god.