The first movie was good and all, and I own the first three movies and this remake. But the remake was far better than the first film. When this was in theaters I watched this, followed by the first movie to see how it holds up. The first movie's good, but there are also a ton of problems with it that doesn't make it as great as it once was. Still good, but this is far better.
shareWhile I don't think this is better then the original, it has some good ideas and scenes. The original is a classic and I can't wait to scare the piss out of my kids with it. Remake is a watchable film but gotta stick with the original.
shareStop smoking crack or are you a studio plant??
The original is WAY better than this garbage.
Agree Predator, the OP is a studio plant and studio plants are on IMDB and i know what good filmmaking is, this remake is just a soulless CGI tainted (CGI and horror don't mix) and boring remake of a classic that should never be remade and i'm glad it flopped.
"Unicorn, mermaid, vampire,sorceress! No name you'd give her would surprise me i love whom i love"
I agree, there's absolutely no way that any sane person could legitimately think this was better than the original!
shareThat does not necessitate OP being a plant. theres a very large number of people going around that could in no way be called sane.
------------------------------------------------
The spirit of abysmal despair
The Family Guy version was better than the remake.
shareI get that art is subjective. That said, you're wrong--the original is superior in every way; this remake is drivel and there's no debate.
shareJerry Goldsmith's score from the original ALONE is better than this piss poor excuse for a movie.
shareThis was below average and forgettable.Hated all the terrible CGI.Nowhere near better than the original.
shareThe original was atrocious anyway, both are bad films.
share