MovieChat Forums > Game of Thrones (2011) Discussion > Bran Was In Control The Whole Time

Bran Was In Control The Whole Time

posted 5 years ago by prometheus1816 (1051)
5 replies | jump to latest

There was a conversation I just read on the Blind Wave finale video that is so true to what the actual outcome was for this show. The conversation goes as such....

Someone said while the rest of the people were playing with their toys on the ground, Bran was playing 7 dimensional chess. He set all of this stuff up to happen with driving Dany crazy, revealing Jon's parentage, and allowing Kings Landing to burn so he could become King.

Everything that happened was of his doing. Even the beheading of Ned to Robb's murder, to having Sansa as his tool to the North. She thinks she's free there, she's not.

Also don't forget what Max Von Sydow's character said. He was 1000 years old. Bran has been "elected" King. He can never have children, but he'll rule for 1000 years because he can't die. And why else would he have mentioned Sansa on her wedding night...... Why bother mentioning this to her? Why?

He's not the saviour. He's Damien Thorn personified. He made Dany go mad. Therefore HE murdered thousands in Kings Landing, not Dany. That scene when the bells rang, that was Bran warging her into destruct mode.

I believe that Bran can't warg a dragon because what Dany said about a dragon is not a slave. But he can warg into the direwolves.

And it's even worse. According to the ASOIAF lore, Missandei's home is Naath. What's in Naath? Poisoned butterflies. The Dothraki and the Unsullied are being sent there by Bran to have them die. They won't come back. He's even sicker than we think. Just like when he commented on Sansa's wedding night. Why would he have done that? Did he do that to gauge her response because clearly he got a rise out of her. Playing games maybe?

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

"Everything that happened was of his doing. Even the beheading of Ned to Robb's murder"

Couldn't have, he wasn't the three eyed raven then.

[–] prometheus1816 (1051) 5 years ago

He was starting his journey to there. He'd already come out of the coma and was walking, talking, and having the visions of the raven.

[–] eYeDEF (5050) 5 years ago

Doesn't matter. He wasn't the three eyed raven. He didn't have the psychic foresight to orchestrate their deaths to his benefit. Your thesis is incoherent.

[–] Otter (24464) 5 years ago

Hey! If Bran was warging into Drogon, then the dragon's failure to burn Jon into a briquette finally makes sense!

That's the ONLY possible explanation.

[–] prometheus1816 (1051) 5 years ago

No, Bran didn't warg into Drogon. Nor Rhaegal or Viserion. Why? Dany kept telling us, "Zaldrīzes buzdari iksos daor." or "A Dragon is not a slave." Dragons cannot be tamed except by their rider who bonds with them. Therefore Drogon was bound to Dany and only she could control him. A dragon will also never kill their rider or another Targaryen. Jon's Targaryen ancestry protected him from Drogon making him into a broiled steak. That is the reason Dany had to be killed or gotten rid of so Drogon would leave. If Drogon sensed someone else was to blame for what happened to Dany, he'd reduce all of Westeros to ash. So Bran had Jon kill Dany to get rid of Drogon.

He had the Night King spear Viserion therefore removing him as a threat. Then gave the information to Euron in order for him to be where he was to take down Rhaegal so Jon wouldn't have a ride.