MovieChat Forums > Letters to Juliet (2010) Discussion > Anyone feel sorry for the fiance

Anyone feel sorry for the fiance


He was excited about the restaurant and she gave up on him so quick cause of a new crush.

reply

I didn't feel sorry for him. I don't think his character was developed enough for me to have any empathy for him. From the start I couldn't see what the two of them had in common, esp. to be fiances. They were on different career paths (she to open his own Italian restaurant and she to become a writer). Now that I think about it, there really wasn't much to Charlie to be attracted to as well.

reply

Nope, I didn't feel sorry for him.

He might be upset for a bit after the break-up, but I don't think he'd be truly heartbroken. His TRUE LOVE is his career as a chef.

Sophie was actually being supportive by not dumping him immediately after Verona. She stood by him, until only a day or two before the opening of his restaurant. Everything is pretty much set.

Her presence or absence in his life wouldn't have made much of an impact.

Actually, my guess is that was the real status of Sophie throughout their relationship. Not just during the "starting the restaurant" phase. She was just an accessory in his life. As long as she wasn't being an inconvenience to Victory's plans, then the relationship is fine.

Sophie's only demand was for that "pre-honeymoon" holiday for a few days. And even that he couldn't give to her. Just a few days in exchange for pretty much the rest of their relationship being all about Victor and his "passion."

I can only blame her naivete and youth for being attracted to his passionate nature and not realizing right away that everything else will come second to his love for cooking.

I thought Charlie was a great guy. Charlie may have been a busy lawyer, but he definitely had no qualms accompanying his grandmother to lookout for her. The guy knows how to value the people he cares about. A better match for Sophie, definitely.

reply

Yes, she dumped him for a guy with no job and nothing obvious to do with his life other than to look at her romantically in perpetuity.

I do feel sorry for the guy. Being absorbed in the entrepreneurial act of opening your own business is a very positive quality. To dump the guy while he has so much going on is pretty cruel.

Somehow I don't imagine she would feel ashamed about getting absorbed in her own work to the exclusion of all else.

People on here who say that their marriage wouldn't have worked out because they didn't want to spend all their time together don't get it. People having their own interests and being able to make themselves happy is what makes relationships work -- depending on someone else to do it for you does not work.

This movie trivialized so many things, but one thing it didn't trivialize was contemporary single urban womanhood. It nailed that genuine triviality dead-center.

reply

I agree with mattbg,

Beside this, the whole storyline was a cliché. Choosing someone as a fiancée is not just like buying a T-Shirt or some stuff. You choose him with much more thinking & real love. When you prefer someone else during just a week then you're not a lover! You'll be in love with every cat! jumping on the wall every week. I didn't like this movie at all.

Thanks.

reply

Yes, I felt bad for him. I kept waiting for them to present a major reason to dislike him and really WANT Sophie to be with Charlie, but it never came. Instead, she is the one who kisses Charlie behind her fiance's back (yeah, it was a short kiss, but still). It seems people forgot about that part?

Sure, he seemed really absorbed in his restaurant and didn't take an immediate interest in her work, but to me, they still represented him as a 'decent' guy who was just busy with the opening. I didn't get the impression he didn't care at ALL, but instead, was just oblivious to the fact that there was even a problem (look how he quickly clears out his kitchen when he finally gets his 'wake up call'). I agree with another user though that is partly Sophie's fault for not speaking up much earlier.

reply

Of course not! Every smart girl knows that if ever a man doesn't pay constant attention to you and worship you 24/7, you should just run off with the first cute guy that shows you interest. Like, duhhhhh.

Got ya! Spooked ya!

reply

People are so anxious to see everything in black and white. It's easier.

Victor was not supposed to be a horrible person. He was just obsessed with his restaurant and did not attempt to make room in his life for Sophie- she would have always come second.

This may have been ok when they were first together, but people change, they figure things out. They try not to make mistakes they'll regret years later.

Victor will meet a woman as into cooking as he, and be much happier.

reply

If anything I felt like she didn't show much interest in his career. He was opening a new restaurant which is a pretty big deal. She was writing a little story that in real life probably wouldn't even get published. He was supportive but he had his own stuff going on.

Who cares if he was a little self-absorbed? She cheated on him, then dumped him in front of his employees. Not cool.

reply

interesting take on it - you are right though - it has to go both ways really, it's not just his 'fault', and perhaps he needed to hear from her, he needed her to get mad at him rather than a kind of 'if you need to ask why you will never know' situation, leaving him oblivious. while he was very focussed on his project it would possibly be to his detriment to sustain that in the long run, if it was just a short thing while they launched the restaurant yeah maybe she could have been a bit more tolerant and patient but if it was a consistent thing then maybe it was fair enough. In the context of the movie it seemed fairly consistent, and the story is through her point of view and for the purpose of the plot and transferrance to the viewers thye are meant to resonate with being neglected by their love in order in a sense connect with the one who does show her interest even if he doesn't seem to have any big plans or ambitions (from a strictly practical point of view).

reply

[deleted]

I felt sorry for him when she broke up with him, because he truly was clueless that anything was wrong. He wasn't a bad guy, just not for her.

I found him to be much more interesting than Charlie, actually, and if they just would have given us more insight into Victor, and how he felt and why he felt that way, it would have been more interesting to see her stay with him in the end.

reply

Actually, this is a good point. Nevermind her treatment of Victor: what about the completely non-entity that is Charlie? How was he of interest other than to talk with an English accent and show up whenever she needed him? Did he even have anthing else to do with his time?

The message I get from this is that women like this girl want men who have no passions of their own and serve only to worship the ground they walk on 24x7. It's why, in my earlier comment, I said that it was not trivializing single urban womanhood because it *really is* trivial.

reply

I disliked Victor at first, but then Charlie showed up. And that breakup scene was pretty epic

reply

Her fiance was a douchebag. He was self absorbed. There was no room in his relationship with his love of food for his fiance to fit in to his life.

reply

Far better to go looking for a guy who has nothing of subsance in his life and talks like a cartoon aristocrat?

Relationships endure because people are independently happy, not because one depends on the other for their happiness. This is a fictional relationship and anyone who goes chasing this ideal will likely fail.

reply

He could do better than her, at least he never cheated on her like she did.

Try drinking bleach, its fun?

reply