MovieChat Forums > The Interrogation of Michael Crowe (2002) Discussion > Why do you think the jury convicted him ...

Why do you think the jury convicted him even though the prosecution did not put forth even the tiniest shred...


...of evidence that he killed his sister?

reply

They didn't convict him. The case was dismissed without prejudice, which means he could have been retried if any further evidence was found.

reply

Why did you say "further" evidence when the thugs had no evidence against him to begin with?

reply