MovieChat Forums > Sleepers (1996) Discussion > No sympathy for Tom and John

No sympathy for Tom and John


Naturally, we have sympathy for Tom and John as children for what they went through, and if their sole crime had been the murder of the pedophile guard, I would understand everyone's desire to let them get away with their crime.

The fact is that Tom and John were guilty of many other murders, and most of their victims probably did nothing to deserve their fate. For example, it's mentioned that one of them murdered a man for cutting in front of him in line or being rude to him.

As far as I'm concerned, Tom and John deserved to die or to spend the rest of their lives in prison, not for killing the guard, but for the rest of their crimes. If it took killing a pedophile to have them finally put away or executed, so be it (it would be a matter of killing two, or rather three, birds with one stone that needed killing), and Father Bobby was a fool for committing perjury on their behalf. Father Bobby lied to let two dangerous murderers back on the street to kill again, and their next victims wouldn't be pedophile guards any more than their previous victims were.

In other words, the film's story the alleged moral dilemma would have been more effective if Tom and John weren't thugs and if killing the guard in revenge was the only murder they were responsible for.

reply

We are supposed to feel sorry for them because they were not gonna be street punks, killing people randomly if its not for the tragedy of Wilkinson. It is mentioned during the movie that John was really wanted to be a priest, they were both leading to a good path, but the abuse and rape wrecked their believe in God.

reply

We are supposed to feel sorry for them because they were not gonna be street punks, killing people randomly if its not for the tragedy of Wilkinson. It is mentioned during the movie that John was really wanted to be a priest, they were both leading to a good path, but the abuse and rape wrecked their believe in God.


As I said, I feel sorry for them as children, but being abused as a kid shouldn't be a get out of jail free card for anyone. Most people who are sexually abused as kids don't grow up to be street thugs and murderers.

You can sympathize with what happened to somebody as a kid, but still acknowledge the fact that once that person commits a murder, he deserves incarceration or death just like anybody else. The fact that Tom and John killed several innocent people rather than just Nokes erased any sympathy I may have had for them. One of them killed a man for cutting ahead of him in line, and got away with it. If the film's premise was for us to see their acquittal through perjury as a triumph, it failed in its goal. As far as I'm concerned, Tom and John deserved to die as much as Nokes did (and incidentally, if you found out that Nokes himself was probably molested as a kid, as many pedophiles are, would that make you sympathetic towards him? Probably not, so why sympathize with Tom and John)?

reply

There is no sympathy for Tom and John.

Though, the murder of nokes was not something to punish them for. This is separate from their other murders which if they were caught, nobody would have helped them get away with it.






Dr. Who is to entertainment what Special Olympics is to athleticism.

reply

If you found out that Nokes himself was molested as a kid, as many pedophiles are, would that make you sympathetic towards him? Probably not, so why sympathize with Tom and John?


An interesting point, I would - and kind of do - agree, but I think the main difference is that they became murderers instead of child molesters, which is still terrible, but doesn't tend to anger people quite as much.

reply

''being abused as a kid shouldn't be a get out of jail free card for anyone...once that person commits a murder, he deserves incarceration or death just like anybody else.''

absolutely agree, too often we try to justify peoples' poor behaviour for their past lives but yes a tragic childhood or life cannot excuse it.

reply

The abuse they suffered drove them onto that path. I agree that it's a pretty weak justification, but they probably got into crime as soon as they left Wilkinson's and never turned back.

I used to be darker, then I got lighter, then I went dark again.

reply

Michael and Lorenzo went through the same things as John and Tommy. Yet they managed to avoid becoming heartless, cruel, indiscriminate murderers. So, that, "but they were abused," excuse doesn't fly.

"Never mind walking a mile in my shoes. Try thinking a day in my head."

reply

I'm not excusing their behavior. I'm just saying that the abuse most definitely played in part in shaping the men they later became. They didn't have Shakes's intellect or Michael's courage, they were just soft vulnerable boys, and I think it's fair to say that they might have chosen different paths if not for the abuse they suffered. I'll admit that I'm much more sympathetic to the boys they once were than the murderers they eventually became. They committed many terrible acts (although the murder of Nokes was justified in my eyes) and both paid for it in the end by dying painful, untimely deaths. That seems fair to me.

You who wish to conquer pain, you must learn to serve me well.

reply

Also John and Tommy looked like the youngest of the 4 and unlike Michael the Leader or Shakes the intellect, they were followers and bot as strong willed as the other 2. I'm sure a lot of other criminals had difficult lives as well growing up and unfortunate circumstances, so I agree its not an excuse. But I do have sympathy seeing what they went through and what they could've been.

reply

Michael and Lorenzo went through the same things as John and Tommy. Yet they managed to avoid becoming heartless, cruel, indiscriminate murderers


You can't expect everyone to react in the same way in a particular situation, because people are inherently different.

I am by no means suggesting that we excuse everything, but I think a little understanding and compassion can be far more helpful than stridently clutching our pearls and tut tutting like a bunch of old hens 




"Puss rules!"
"It's Pus"

reply

"You can't expect everyone to react in the same way in a particular situation, because people are inherently different."

Annnndddd also this. Two people will go through the same experience and yet will have two totally different reactions.

Just like reading a book, watching a movie or even lostening to music. A lot of people will see/hear the same thing you will, but will make a different understanding/appreciation of it.

reply

Michael and Lorenzo went through the same things as John and Tommy. Yet they managed to avoid becoming heartless, cruel, indiscriminate murderers. So, that, "but they were abused," excuse doesn't fly.

Well, we don't know the full extent of their family life, upbringing and other important factors. In any case, two human beings can go two different ways, not the same, even with similar lives.

reply

"Well, we don't know the full extent of their family life, upbringing and other important factors. In any case, two human beings can go two different ways, not the same, even with similar lives."

Exactly, assuming that someone will make the right choice just because someone else went through the same thing and reacted in a certain manner is just not right. Every human is different.

reply

"Michael and Lorenzo went through the same things as John and Tommy. Yet they managed to avoid becoming heartless, cruel, indiscriminate murderers."

I don't want to sound like the gay who is on their side and say that they are good people... But of course like many others I feel like some kind of justice had been served, no matter if I actually agree with them getting away with it free as birds.

This been said, it is not quite right to consider things under that particular perspective. Especially in America, the family you grow up in will have a significant role in your future. Maybe John and Tommy didn't have the chance to have successful parents like Michael probably did. I didn't watch the movie for a long time so let's not assume that it was the case in the movie but unfortunately it is like it is: some people are born in an advantageous situation, others aren't so lucky.

reply

In the book, before they stopped off at that bar to eat dinner and have a couple of drinks they were on their way to rob a drug dealer and cut off his head. Running into Nokes saved the drug dealers life. John even says it in the mirror of the bathroom looking in the mirror. "Today was your lucky day (insert drug dealers name as I forgot what it was)

" Tell me mom...when your little girl's on the slab...where will it tickle you?"

reply

The OP makes an interesting point. But they also did the world a favor killing Nokes. Why should they go down for that?

I thought this was a pretty good movie, btw. Great cast. But the story was kind of obvious and dreary at the same time. I gave it a 7.

reply

''But they also did the world a favor killing Nokes. Why should they go down for that?''

i see your point and in theory that's perfectly fine but yes they should go down for it in the bigger picture and for the sake of morality and safety. For instance they murdered a man because he abused them, terrible I know but then if they get away with it why shouldn't others get away with it?

And then where do you draw the line? Why should it be ok to murder somebody if they sexually abuse you but not ok if they assault you, bully you, sleep with your girlfriend, or steal from you...? It would be chaos and anarchy. We'd all be going around killing each others over transgressions and you can't jail one and not the other.

reply

People don't have to justify their support for one over another. Their views are their own, nobody is talking about changing laws here. It's a one off instance and people support it. End of story.
Personally I think they should be locked away, but I felt neither positive or negative about them not going to prison for this. They are already suspects in their other crimes and as far as I recall had already done time.

reply

"It's a one off instance and people support it. End of story."

This, I agree. It happens in life way more often than we realize it. From time to time I think everybody contradict themselves.

Like for instance there was this case when a flight coordinator made a mistake and because of this 2 planes collided into eachothers. A dad lost his wife and daughters in this tragedy, and because of his psychological pain went on killing the said flight coordinator. Two things are sure : I don't usually think that someone should be punished for a mistake made at work (because everyone makes mistakes) and I don't believe that murder is acceptable. But in this case when the coordinator's mistake cost many lives and that the father was grieving and didn't really think before reacting the way he did, I can't feel really black and white about it. Even if I don't think that he made his mistake on purpose and neither do I think that the dad reacted in the best possible way, I can't really blame him neither. In a way, when your job involves other people's safety, you have to be ready that someone will have a hard time to accept your mistake. And for the father who lost all his family, it certainly isn't easy to move on.

It is a little bit the same kind of a mixed feeling I have about the case in this movie. I can't say that what John and Tommy did was right, but I can't really blame them for it neither. Looking at it from a certain perspective, they got rid of a despicable human being. Was it their job to decide his faith by making their own justice? Of course not. But I can't blame them because they did so.

reply

"And then where do you draw the line? Why should it be ok to murder somebody if they sexually abuse you but not ok if they assault you, bully you, sleep with your girlfriend, or steal from you...? It would be chaos and anarchy."

Well, I see your point, and even agree with it.

But there is one argument that goes in their favour in this case: they weren't the only children abused but Nokes and the others guards. It was pretty clear that it was only part of their routine. So, they had many, many innocent children who went through these horrible abuses. Maybe killing him wasn't the "right" thing to do but in this case it actually did some justice. I guess that if someone is a treat to society, people wouldn't really consider him as a victime of someone decided to kill them.

Of coirse I agree with your point and don't think that "murder" should be used to make his own justice, but there was this little feeling of "in a way, Nokes deserve it and if this is what is needed for the justice to be finally served agaisnt these child molesting guards, well let it be it for now".

reply

I agree with the OP in the sense that Tom & John lost some of my sympathy when I learned how they turned out.

Yes it was horrific what they went through, they couldn't escape that without some emotional & physical damage.

But what they became was their CHOICE. All humans have free will.
The fact that a couple of their cohorts became good guys fighting FOR other good guys proves this.




I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus.
Didn't he discover America?
Penfold, shush.

reply

I don't think you can simplify anything that happened in this film as a 'choice'. it was all a consequence of trauma and PTSD. when you're dealing with those kind of mental issues, it's almost as if it isn't you talking.

reply

I don't think you can simplify anything that happened in this film as a 'choice'. it was all a consequence of trauma and PTSD. when you're dealing with those kind of mental issues, it's almost as if it isn't you talking.

Thats how I saw it. PTSD can change everything about yourself including your whole personality, and it can make you very impulsive and act on edge. Maybe their crimes were acted out as a defense mechanism? All the symptoms just seem to fit their situation and how they became the way they did as they got older. I think keeping the sexual assaults they went though as a secret their whole lives made it even worse on them too and what had really turned it into PTSD. It doesn't have to turn completely into PTSD if you confront the issue earlier on in the beginning, but they never actually did that.

I think that at least one of the differences with the other two, especially Michael, was that they had those memories of reading that book the Count of Monte Cristo to help them feel like there was still some hope left of putting their past to rest if they waited for the right opportunity to get their revenge in a better way rather than just acting out on violence and murder, even if that meant they had to wait many years later.

reply

I don't think you can simplify anything that happened in this film as a 'choice'. it was all a consequence of trauma and PTSD. when you're dealing with those kind of mental issues, it's almost as if it isn't you talking.
I do think there are mitigating circumstances when people are called to judgement. I think it's worse that a "normal" person decides to kill for greed or selfish reasons,than a couple guys whose childhood was hell, and had affected them.
A persons background is a factor in how they deal with life, and boys traumatized like they were would have had really bad issues affecting them and their outlook on life.

reply

I don't think you can simplify anything that happened in this film as a 'choice'. it was all a consequence of trauma and PTSD. when you're dealing with those kind of mental issues, it's almost as if it isn't you talking.
I do think there are mitigating circumstances when people are called to judgement. I think it's worse that a "normal" person decides to kill for greed or selfish reasons,than a couple guys whose childhood was hell, and had affected them.
A persons background is a factor in how they deal with life, and boys traumatized like they were would have had really bad issues affecting them and their outlook on life.

reply

"But what they became was their CHOICE. All humans have free will."

Do you even know how such an experience could fuck up your whole life? Especially if you are still a kid when it happens?

And once again, the fact that the other two turned good IS NOT a proof because everyone will live with it differently. Sure you can say that they took the wrong path, but you can't compare their reactions with other people's reaction to the same abuse and assume that everyone could live with it the same way. It just isn't how it works.

reply

I disagree that the film's moral or point would have been better had they not been thugs. At any rate they were both killed shortly after all of this happened so I think that was the writer's way of giving them their own punishment. They certainly didn't live happily ever after.


"Why couldn't the monkey arrange this from INSIDE the garbage can?"

reply

John & Tommy weren't tried in court but they did die a short time after the movie's events took place, both before they hit 30. Even if it was by outside circumstances, they got their punishment.

As for Father Bobby, he wasn't just some witness recruited to give a false alibi, he was like a real Father to all those boys since they were little kids. He loved them for the kids they were, not what they'd become. Even after Shakes told him all the horror that happened, it was still not an easy decision for him but again he probably knew how much better they'd have turned out if not for their abuse and knew that in principle they couldn't go down for THIS murder.


Har ring molassis abounding
Common lap kitch sardin a poor floundin
.

reply

Yes, I think that was why Father Bobby stuck up for these two punks. He knew who they were now and couldn't do anything about it (they chose this life), but he didn't know about the boys' home stuff and maybe he felt that if he had known back then, he might've saved them from the rapes and beatings. He felt they shouldn't be convicted of this murder.

reply

I could be wrong but I highly doubt that you´ve experienced and lived the really ugly side of life. Then atleast you wouldn´t have a textbook politically correct approach to this matter.

If Nokes was sexually abused as a child is pretty irrelevant. If every weirdo,pervert or creep was attracted to children,had urges but instead of acting on thm,just jerked off to their fantasies and never watched childpornografy,not ONE act affecting or hurting another human...really,who would have the energy to give a shi-?

It´s the very concious,aware decision in a sober state especially to molest a child that confirms and reveals that this person is pure evil and no circumstances have any weight to torture children by buring them with cigarettes,beating them,raping them over and over,all the while doing it with sadistic glee,really getting Off on a childs torment and pain.


Nokes even remembered John and Tommy,which is disturbing in either scenario;he hadn´t moletd that many boys and still he carried out these deranged acts hile casually talking about overtime and taxes...Or he had wrecked so many lives but got off on knowing their names,knowing whos lives he had destroyed,all of them placed in the pychotic Hall of shame,trophies in his head,maybe to him a destroyed life by his hand was truly worthy of remembrance.


To sympathize with them as children but not as adults is a contradiction or a statement that shows your true nature. Time is just a concept or word we created to sum up our life expectancy,so we don´t miss doctors appointments or get to the store in time. This trauma happened when they were 12-13 and from that point on time likely stood still and just existing became a deep pain keeping them from ever living a life that resembled something normal or decent.


If a guy loses his legs,his wife and child due to a drunk driver convicted of DUI on several occasions,do you sympathize with him in that moment? And what if he in his grief and rage payed to have the driver killed two days later...how about two months,a year and a half? To him,time stands still,he will always be locked in that moment but where does your empathy,not sympathy begin and end?


Dying can be pretty easy,so can taking a life,a trigger is pulled and the curtain come down before you even hear the shot. Where´s the horror in that? The pedohile,Nokes kind more so,his actions are so diabolical,inhumane and irreversible,they trancend the concept of potential justice or the punishment fitting the crime.

To achieve sexual satisfaction and having an orgasm not despite but BECAUSE a young boy or girl,a child who was gonna discover his own sexuality and attraction to the opposite sex pretty soon is crying and screaming from pain and wishing he was dead. Every orifice violated by a grown man who is payed to protect kids he brutalizes and repeats this act over and over...are you fakkin´kiddin´Me??


Destroying a childs ability to live or chance at becoming remotely happy..no matter what,the person will never be as at peace or stabile as it could´ve been...and don´t give me that "It happened to him or me or etc and that didn´t lead to murder and crime",that´s child molestor secret sympathize group therapy talk.

None of us know what will break us and which road will lead to self destruction or suicide. To seriouly be talking about it being a choice,going down a destructive life path? At about 13? Sure. About as much choice as being orally and anally raped and tortured for no reason at all except existing..

These two dudes weren´t psychopats by nature,that´s pretty obvious. Young John was the one most devastated over the accident,not thinking about likely consequenses but the injured mans wellbeing. The kid wanted to be a priest. He was a very talented artist about to get into artschool thanks to father Bobby. The drawings we see during the trial symbolize the potential not wasted but stolen. Getting the shi- beaten outta him by his stepdad did Not turn him into a dangerous criminal. He was strong,not weak.


So John and Tommy acted out,their pain manifested itself through violent acts but I still feel like they were more comfortable in their own skin then a non-violent dude like Michael...Becoming what they became is a sane, normal response to a psychotic, cruel chain of events.


They Never asked for your sympathy by the way or anyone elses. Very ironic how you judge them so harsh based on information you are handed by the narrator,the protagonist. Although though those words are meant to clue you in on how dangerous and ruthless they are,just stating obvious facts...and you latch on to it like a leech,jump on it like a bitch in heat,you found an angle that helps you disguise or support your obvious but not stated agenda and opinion.


People die everyday,murdered everyday,a killing is mentioned,one regarding a secondary protagonist or tritagonist which is meant to confirm the obvious result of actions and consequenses,Not give the viewer a reason to despice and marginalize the character we´ve been following for an hour,seeing the hell he´s been through. John and Tommy might be judged by God IF he exists but as far as the audience,Nokes or the world goes,they have NOTHING to apologize for,they owe the world nothing...their crys for help didn´t do much good nordid praying to God. Nokes became their God or devil,their Frankenstein...he created two monsters and Karma gave them a chance to thank their creator. So they did.


Moral dilemma if they weren´t thugs or hardened criminals...HOW? That´s just nonsensical and unsettling,man. First of,someone who went through what they went through and never comitted a crime in their life would be able to carry out this act? And not even including the part where this person would have a weapon on his person at this particular time.

John was a murderer. He and Tommy co-founded the West Side boys,a street level-based crime syndicate....and when he saw Nokes he turned into a scared little boy again,all pale,of course he was a shell of his former self cause being a vicious gangster was easier to be then a broken victim...you´re describing a person who wouldn´t exist in the real world. If he did,he would be close to a superhuman,never transforming his despair and emptiness into something violent or dark,just a regular guy who stumbles upon his tormentor in a restaurant...


Exactly,who except a molestor of children or arrogant,condescending victim could even concider the notion of a man becoming a "Regular guy" after 18 months of torture and rape? Since that scenario is the one that would give YOU a moral dilemma you Again very obviously reveal where your sympathies lie. Since a person sexually abused and violated as a child has to be a citizen without a criminal record and a history of violence for it to be a dilemma for you....just creepy. '
THIS is supposed to be the dilemma,coldhearted criminal murderers execute the man who changed the course of their lives for the worse. The fact that this is even a topic is very bothering and sickening.


Here´s you....RAPISTS OF INNOCENT CHILDREN SHOULD NOT BE HARMED OR KILLED CAUSE TWO WRONGS DO NOT MAKE A RIGHT. Well,it's not exactly nuclear physics,it is a somewhat easy and simple choice,you pick a side...has a mans right to exist expired when he delibaretely has projected his sickness and sexual deviance onto human beings who does not even know what sex or sexual deviance and will be destroyed by it in some form,for them,the degenerate,disturbed sex likely becomes the norm,the expected view on sexuality. Yes or no?

You KNOW what Nokes did. I´m not talking about innuendos and speculations,you as a viewer Know!! Right? And if you saw him alone in a restaurant eating,you wouldn´t If you had a knife or any weapon on your person follow him and atleast break his legs and/OR knock out all his teeth? No. You wouldn´t. To me,you´re almost as accountable as him since you see the sin,you see the sinner like a fisherman spots another fisherman from afar....and would do nothing to save innocent,newly started lives.


Since that's what they did;The system had failed not only them but so many children,they held court in the streets. Ask yourself and not even in reflective hindsight....HOW MANY LIFES DID THEY SAVE BY KILLING NOKES?? Forget their motive,even be the ultraliberal pedophile supporter and marginalize like you do,forget all his other victims. View their deed through a humane,pragmatic lens. How many victims in those years? 14?43? Of which only a handful took their own..."LIVES"??

Now,if you want them to be punished for their crimes,a murder of an ordinary citizen and about eight murders of no-good lowlifes like them and you would want those sentences handed out AFTER they clipped Nokes,then I might join in,agree we should all be held accountable for our actions. There you could pull your moral dilemma card.


We can't be animals,of course we gotta do some time...but if they were convicted BEFORE murdering Nokes,it would just be two lives completely wasted. Instead,they took the opportunity randomness or fate had given them to create meaning and purpose to their hollow existence and preordained doom. He was not only 15 years later still a free man but the creep was employed,had an income.

Ha...a working man without any priors is castrated,executed,shot seven times by coldhearted massmurderers....it really gets your got going,doesn't it? Yeah,it's obvious. Since this scenario is textbook Moral court vs the legal one....and you're not exactly invested in the former. I could respect that ya tand by your moral convictions...IF thěy weren't so repulsive and hipocritical.


By stating you feel father Bobby shouldn't have lied for them(Exactly HOW VILE is a man when a law-abiding priest scared of reprisals from a God"he knows"exists is less haunting and disturbing then approving the depraved actions of a man so diabolical,his transgressions trancend evil as a concept in a humane humans world.

By using hypotheticals to create a scenario where Nokes MIGHT HAVE been molested as a child and thus creating a possible but for decent people irrelevant and nonsensical corrolation between crime and criminals in general and raping and psychologically maiming kids who can't even fight back....which is the not random or spontaneous but rather calculated and predatory reason for Nokes actions.....yeah,I'm calling you out. Plus I call you a potential enabler and dsguised supporter of pedophila. I don't really give a shi! about who you are on the inside. These are words,not actions....and since the internet is a safe haven for all kinds of degenerates,I feel like....your words have revealed your core and rationalizing.

I know this might seem harsh but....you literally make me sick and I feel the world would be a safer place for kids if your metality didn't exist sooooo.....yeah. Yes,I wish you had expired for everyones sake. Right or wrong,your right will never be mine or anyones with empathetic principles.


EVERYONE!!! If these two gladly can accept their potential punishment,they who suffered first hand,why can't you? And HOW ...can you expect your high-horse,"All life has value" judgment removed from the realities of life to have any effect,significcance or sway except in the deranged world of pedophilia?? Which is as morally criminal as anything comes. You are welcome for your self-inflicted ironic shame. So....I broke a toe two days ago,ya want a long-ass stor about that too??

reply

The funny thing is they became gangsters even after being punished in that boys' home. They didn't turn their lives around into something good, like the other two boys.

In the end, after the trial, they are acquitted, but eventually met their ends themselves, as most criminals do.

reply