MovieChat Forums > Snapdragon (1993) Discussion > Furious Chelsea Field's rack was absent

Furious Chelsea Field's rack was absent

posted 14 years ago by groove76
3 replies | jump to latest

I didn't give a crap about Pamela Anderson in this movie, her nude scenes, lame-ass character, nothin'.

To me, Chelsea Field was the reason I spent a buck for this as she is a thousand times sexier than Anderson. But yet the two fvcking sex scenes she's in she's wearing a top in both of them. WHAT. THE. FVCK?! For how sh!tty this movie is, I feel like I was cheated the only possible redeeming quality.

</vent>

I'll go watch "A Passion to Kill" now and wish I was Bakula, in both the movie and IRL.

---
Man in motion, going nowhere

[–] bishop-69757 8 years ago

Over 6 years old but I'll respond anyway. Pam was smoking hot but I agree Chelsea fields is hot in a different kind of way. She doesn't look like a model but she's beautiful. I guess Pam would be fun for a night but Chelsea is a keeper.

[–] legnadibrom (5847) 3 months ago

Chelsea could have been Tomb Raider if they made it in 1984

[–] blue1981 (6945) 4 years ago

Whatever floats your boat. She's 62 now and doesn't look good at all.