MovieChat Forums > Hook (1991) Discussion > Why didn't this work?

Why didn't this work?


I think one of the frustrating things about Hook is despite all of the talented people involved, there is just something about this movie that doesn't gel together.

John Williams score is good, the acting is not bad, Robin Williams, Dustin Hoffman and Bob Hoskins are excellent, yet the movie is a misfire.

For myself, I think the movie looks to stagey. Everything in Neverland is an obvious set, and would be at home on Broadway, but on the big screen it somehow doesn't work for me.

I like Peter's journey to rediscover himself as Pan. There are good scenes in the movie but it just never fits together properly.

reply

This movie worked incredibly well, and has a huge cult following. I've never met anyone who didn't enjoy this movie (not to say that everyone did enjoy it). It has a very original and heartfelt story, the acting is great (Dustin Hoffman was the best Hook I've ever seen), and the John Williams score only enhances the visual experience. This movie just has too many good things going for it to say that it didn't work.

I agree with you though, it does have a stagey feel to it, but it was probably done intentionally. Keep in mind that Peter Pan has been done numerous times as a play, so it actually makes sense for this movie to have that feel to it.

reply

Now, I love this movie but I see what you're saying about how everything looks like a set. But I don't see how that could be such a big problem. Let's remember the origin of the Peter Pan story. It was originally written as a play. And one of the more defining adaptations of the story was the 1960 Mary Martin live broadcast of the 1954 Broadway play. So, Peter Pan is much at home in a "staged" environment. Hook feels very much like Spielberg's tribute to classic swashbuckling adventure films where everything had to be filmed on sets as opposed to on location and maybe it's Spielberg paying tribute to the original stage versions of Peter Pan. I love the fabricated stagey look to Neverland in Hook, and combine that with the great acting from the leads, the amazing score, and clever story, I'd hardly call it a misfire, but that's just me.

reply

The Lost Boys' sets were unbearable. Absolutely ridiculous. Dare we get into some incredibly dated (even at that time) "new wave" hairstyles? Jeez, and they haven't aged well at all...

Too bad, as Hoffman's Hook was a class act!

And, as someone else pointed out, Pan as an adult was a bad move storywise.

The film remains cringeworthy today; and if it has a cult-following, it's because it's "cheesy" in that Plan 9 sort of way.

reply

Yes it did

very better than the emotionless and forgetable Peter Pan 2003

reply

For myself, I think the movie looks to stagey. Everything in Neverland is an obvious set, and would be at home on Broadway, but on the big screen it somehow doesn't work for me.


The original Peter Pan WAS a stage play, so it makes all sense looking stagey.

reply

I think it was brought down by bad editing. I don't know if the editors were afraid to say no to Steven Spielberg or what but many of the scenes drag on way too long. 144 min. is way too long for the young audience this was aimed at.

reply

I can agree with this. I like the movie a lot but it really drags.

reply

[deleted]

This was one of my most-watched movies when I was a youngster. I am watching it again at age 27 and I must admit it is not the film I remember. I have to agree that it is bloated, strained, confused and at many times cringe-worthy. But it's not a disaster as the rotten tomatoes rating and reviews like "Spielberg's worst film" might indicate. I think Dustin Hoffman is actually fairly amazing as Hook. He has the best lines by far and outdoes the material. His scenes with Bob Hoskins' Smee are the only ones that work properly.

Unfortunately I think a lot of the problem with the film is that the rest of the characters are poorly drawn and not very likeable. The Lost Boys were fun to watch as a kid but as an adult are only just adequate. Rufio is pretty much insufferable and Julia Robert's Tinkerbell is annoying. But the biggest problem is Robin Williams as Peter Pan. I actually don't blame Williams because I think with better material he could have been great. But the character himself is genuinely unlikeable for most of the film, so doesn't really work as the character we're supposed to be rooting for.

I really feel that what happened was Spielberg signed on to the project before there was a complete script, and the best they could come up with was this, which he knew wasn't great but was just good enough to get on with. It does feel like he dialed this one in a bit. The movie really should have started 10 minutes after it did. All the stuff in Chicago with the play and the baseball game and the office and the plane flight is just terrible, slow, boring and doesn't actually add anything except making us dislike Robin William's Peter more and more.

I would have begun the movie as the family arrives at Granny Wendy's house and completely cut out the long and boring and irrelevant speech scene. There is enough exposition to set up Peter's life and his relationship with his family and his past, and things actually start happening (the kids getting nabbed) without about 15 minutes instead of 45. In fact I think a good deal of people would like the film a lot more if that had been the case, and if I ever show it to a friend I might do just that.

reply

It's one of my favourite Spielberg films. The score is just breathtakingly beautiful by Williams. Hoffman's Captain Hook is just pitch perfect and there is a real beauty to the film, and sadness and joy and happiness.

I actually believe the stories concept was great - Peter Pan grows up!

Nowadays there seems to be no new concepts in movies. By showing a grown up Pan, Hook took a different approach with a character. A very interesting approach in my view, that opened up a wealth of opportunities. Why did Peter grow up? What were his motives?

It has everything really; an uptight grown-up discovering his sense of fun and his inner child. The scene where the Lost Boy recognises Pan by checking his facial features is one of my favourite moments in movies.

Don't get the negative reviews.

reply

I do not understand why there is so much fighting going on about this movie. It is a simple FANTASY film. With some wonderful actors, and a pretty good story line. I agree it is No "Gone with the wind, or Wizard of Oz" But it is great to relax on a Sunday afternoon with your family and to watch.

reply