I cannot believe the people on here saying that Juliette Lewis is hot in this, or that Juliette's performance proves that the age of consent needs to be lowered to 15. You people are disgusting and need to check yourselves. Looking forward to seeing you all on the sex offender registry.
Boy, they're great at that age, ain't they? So many discoveries ahead of em.
@jefspicoli82 LOL!
shareis the idiot "lol" all you can seriously think of typing?
shareIt’s amazing how often you go after people about using “lol. “
You hit me with it around a year ago and I thought it was funny. What’s even more comical is that I see that you do this all the time, and here your chastising someone from the IMDb boards about it.
Carry on with your quest! “LOL”
OMG the scene on the houseboat where he was checking out her bare feet… but seriously, JL was incredibly cute in the movie. I've pretty much like her in every movie she's done.
shareAre you sure you're not thinking of "From Dusk Till Dawn" when the character played by Quentin Tarantino has a foot fetish and is checking out the feet of Juliette Lewis's character?
shareHow do you guys feel about Emma Watson in the Harry Potter movies?
share[deleted]
Hot as a firecracker on the 4th of Ju-ly.
"While you were still learning how to spell your name, I was being trained to conquer galaxies!"
Almost as hot as Hayden Panetettiere in Remember the Titans...
shareThe list of cuties/hotties like that could go on and on! Dakota Fanning in "Hounddog" and Chloe Grace Moretz [as Hit Girl] in "Kick Ass" and also as the little barefoot 12yo vampire girl in "let me in" the list of little darlings as I said, could go on for pages! Love it when they get a career started so early in life, you get to watch them grow up through all the phases of hotness!
shareI love it, all the phases of hotness. there is nothing wrong with lusting after a 15 year old or 13 year old girl. people are stupid saying these things are wrong or unlawful. fuc# the age of consent when it comes to girls 15 or older.
share"While you were still learning how to spell your name, I was being trained to conquer galaxies!"
LOL!!!! Post of the Day
Ah, who cares OP? At the time she was 17... a little old, don't you think? Ha ha. But I did find her um, sexy. Her legs in particular, were incredibly hot! In the amazing theater scene, where Cady begins to stick his thumb in her mouth, and she begins to suck it - then they proceed with a helluva kiss... it's hot stuff. Don't see what's wrong about being attracted to a 17/18 year broad. Oh, and to the post above, Emma Watson was pretty damn hot in the 5th dull Potter film. She as well, was reaching adulthood by then, but she manage to look really good. Plus, she's older than me, so what the heck.
shareI know exactly people are so ignorant getting caught up in the age of consent and the age of 18 so much that they just can't see how it can be ok to have sex with a 17 year old girl, like one year is going to make that much of a difference in her life, or two years, or three years. 15 should be the age of consent everywhere in America. think of all the less crime we would have if it was this way. bottom line is regardless of what the age of consent is people are going to have sex at any age. the only thing that matters is how the kids are raised.
shareWow, chill the *beep* out! How is it sick for a man to appreciate a young woman's beauty? It's not as if there is some switch in my testes that shuts them off when I am looking at a girl who is younger than 18 years old. If it has breasts and a female figure then three million years of evolution has programmed me to ogle it. That doesn't mean that I am going to act on my urges.
Methinks I read the laments of a jealous dried up old woman.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com
If you are 30 something it wouldn't be okay even if the girl is 18 yo. Maybe legal, but you would be a creep nonetheless.
shareWowsers what a bitchy thing to say. Why then is it "creepy," to be attracted to a younger woman who is of legal age? Would it be creepy if I were a 35-year-old cougar lusting after a 18-year-old boy?
Women mistakenly assume that because a man is attracted to them physically that:
a) He can't control that attraction.
-and-
b) He is willing to put up with all of her *beep* in exchange for the sex that she graciously bestows upon him.
Neither is the case. Stop pretending that we cannot resist you.
BTW...News *beep* flash! Men generally prefer younger women. Deal with it.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com
Would it be creepy if I were a 35-year-old cougar lusting after a 18-year-old boy?
Women mistakenly assume that because a man is attracted to them physically that:
a) He can't control that attraction.
BTW...News *beep* flash! Men generally prefer younger women. Deal with it.
"Lusting over?" At what point does attraction turn into lust? You just don't get it and I am getting tired of explaining it to you. When I see a pretty, fully developed, woman I automatically feel attraction. I might not even realize until after I have felt it that she is not the appropriate age. If I do realize it then it stops. Just because you feel something doesn't make it motivating. I understand that may be a hard concept for women to wrap their heads around.
For instance, there is a pretty 25-year-old girl that I work with. I don't typically date women that I work with but I was intrigued so I started talking with her and I realized that she and I have very little in common and that put her in a category of potential partner that is not conducive to a working environment. You can have a fling with a stranger or you can have a relationship with a co-worker but it causes problems to have a fling with a co-worker. So, in short, the attraction remains but the impulse is easily controlled. There are plenty of women that are attractive that are not co-workers.
An 18-year-old girl poses problems. First, she is too young to take to a bar. Second, you would probably get flack for dating her from people like you. The risks outweigh the benefits. A 21-year-old girl is anatomically indifferent from her 18-year-old counterpart but is advanced enough that only the most ridiculous of people would object to her dating an older man, even if he is in his 40s. At some point there must be a cutoff.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com
I'm a 24 yo heterosexual male. I'm not a woman and I'm not a christian, but I still think it would be amazingly creepy for a 30 something yo to go around looking at teenage girls. There IS difference between a 21 yo girl and an 18 yo girl. 18 yo are usually still mama girls. Even if you think 18 yo girls are already mature enough because law says so, you would be wrong, because most 18 yo are still pretty immature and I would know that because I studied human development during my college years in human sciences. Even if a 21 yo is a 100% complete woman. I would still say that it is creepy for a 40 something yo to look at a woman who could be her own daughter.
There is nothing to "get" here that I'm not getting. In your opinion it is fine to have 30 something yo checking out teenage girls. In my opinion it is just creepy.
Really? How do you have an opinion on this if you are neither 30 nor a woman?
Your "college years?" What? You mean "last year," right? One day when you ARE a 30 year-old man you will look at a 19 year-old woman and observe the presence of a reaction in your genetalia. Remember this conversation when you do.
Bye.
http://phazzle.blogspot.com
[deleted]
[deleted]
Christ, it seems every movie that has an under age girl in it, someone is whining about something to do with her being sexualized. It distracts from actual paedophiles and real creeps who slip under the radar often unnoticed beneath the sea of whiners bitching and moaning because some dude made a sexual remark about a girl who's 17 and 11 months. It's preposterous, there are real monsters out there who fancy 4 year-old children and gleefully walk the legal tightrope so they can't be arrested for their often questionable behaviour, and you're complaining about meaningless bollocks like this.
I'm a 24 yo heterosexual male.
I'm not a woman and I'm not a christian, but I still think it would be amazingly creepy for a 30 something yo to go around looking at teenage girls. There IS difference between a 21 yo girl and an 18 yo girl. 18 yo are usually still mama girls. Even if you think 18 yo girls are already mature enough because law says so, you would be wrong, because most 18 yo are still pretty immature and I would know that because I studied human development during my college years in human sciences. Even if a 21 yo is a 100% complete woman. I would still say that it is creepy for a 40 something yo to look at a woman who could be her own daughter.
There is nothing to "get" here that I'm not getting. In your opinion it is fine to have 30 something yo checking out teenage girls. In my opinion it is just creepy.
Oh God, not another stupid creep who thinks he can justify his creepy desires. Just shut the fück up. I won't even read your stupid ignorant post, it would be a pointless exercise, I've already wasted hours of my life refuting ignorant a*holes like you before and you NEVER accept you are wrong. The only thing you creeps do after I show you how ignorant your arguments are is delete your own posts. So there's nothing to argue about here, you are a creep and that's it. *beep* ignorant dumbass.
shareI can absolutely guarantee you that not only will I not delete my post, but I will bow down and call you King if you can truly refute everything I've said. By all means, I'm very eager to see how ignorant my arguments apparently are, it's easy to say I'm wrong when you don't have the balls to address anything I said other than to call me names and tell me to shut up. The only ignorant one here is you, lad.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
As I said, I won't even read that sh**. I've already wasted countless hours refuting misinformed perverts like you. So yeah, EFF you and good night.
shareYeah, that's what I thought. Coward.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Eff you too, creep. Thank you and good night.
shareGrow some balls and concede - ya got nothin'.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Nope, sorry, but I can't spend my life refuting misinformed people. It's just not an enriching activity, especially when dumbasses like you just love to be wrong.
shareDude, you can make claims about refuting people all day, I could just as easily make up a hundred other people I've refuted because I'm so great and everything, but it doesn't impress anyone does it? The bottom line is you can't refute anything I said right here and now, and if you can, then link me to a post you made elsewhere that did address what I typed specifically if you're too lazy to respond. Otherwise, concede and admit that you're the one who's misinformed. You can call me a dumbass all you like, but without backing up your assertions you're nothing but an empty wagon.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
[deleted]
[deleted]
You keep barking all day. You are factually wrong whether you accept it or not.
shareFacts require evidence. Let's see yours, or shut your yap.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
"Facts requiere evidence"..... I see you haven't read what I said, so let me say it again: I've wasted countless hours refuting dumb misinformed creeps like you. To engage in such discussions once again would be pointless. I've done it before and it only leads to the creeps deleting their posts in shame when I present them with enough evidence, but they never accept they were wrong the whole time and such discussions are tiresome. It's not like they understand the ignorance and stupidity of their arguments quickly, oh no, these discussions take days and days. Tiresome days of trying to explain simple facts to people who are not concerned about facts.
So, as you can see, I'm not interested in refuting your ignorant arguments, because I've done it before and it's pointless and tiresome. The only thing you need to know right now is that I'm right and you are factually wrong. You are ignorant, uncultured, not very bright and you definitely need to start reading more.
"Facts requiere evidence"..... I see you haven't read what I said, so let me say it again: I've wasted countless hours refuting dumb misinformed creeps like you. To engage in such discussions once again would be pointless. I've done it before and it only leads to the creeps deleting their posts in shame when I present them with enough evidence, but they never accept they were wrong the whole time and such discussions are tiresome. It's not like they understand the ignorance and stupidity of their arguments quickly, oh no, these discussions take days and days. Tiresome days of trying to explain simple facts to people who are not concerned about facts.
So, as you can see, I'm not interested in refuting your ignorant arguments, because I've done it before and it's pointless and tiresome. The only thing you need to know right now is that I'm right and you are factually wrong. You are ignorant, uncultured, not very bright and you definitely need to start reading more.
And here was I thinking that my post was simple enough. Oh well... some people are just slow enough to miss the point of such simple posts.
shareThe point of the post was to skate around the obvious fact that you were unable to counter anything I said by pretending you're above attempting to refute people like me because you've already done so elsewhere, for which there is no evidence. Hey, you're right, it is simple.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Yawn... As I said, creeps like you just love being wrong, yet at the same time never accept you are wrong.
shareI'll accept I'm wrong when I'm proven wrong, not when some cowardly little man tells me without doing anything to back it up.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Make no mistake, you are wrong. I know you are factually wrong, even without reading your ignorant posts, because if were right about anything you would be agreeing with me, not arguing. But what can one expect about people in this site. You never open a book, yet you feel you can lecture others about subjects you don't know anything about.
shareThen educate me. If you claim I don't know anything about the subject, and your knowledge is superior, and you can provide evidence, and I'm factually wrong and you can refute everything I said, etc. then do so. You apparently haven't even read my response in full (which I don't buy for a second, you read it, that's why you're refusing to address it), yet you automatically know I'm wrong. Unlike yourself, I've said that I'm more than willing to adjust my viewpoint if you can refute what I said and provide evidence that I am "factually wrong", and if the evidence and your argument is good enough then it wouldn't matter anyway. What you said would speak for itself in regard to anyone reading. But you don't have the balls to do that, and you don't have the balls to concede either when you know your argument wouldn't stand up.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Blah Blah! I won't even read that sh¨t. I don't want to feel the need to engage in yet another pointless neverending discussion only to see you deleting your stupid posts before accepting you are wrong.
shareTake screenshots of my posts if you like, or quote me saying I, Kevinology_Rises will not delete any of my posts. I've nothing to hide, and have no problem admitting I'm wrong if the evidence supports it. If engaging in pointless neverending discussions was something you were uncomfortable with, you wouldn't even still be here, repeating yourself.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
See? What did I tell you? Absolutely and completely wrong.
shareAre you mentally ill, mate?
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
It's always fun to read the dumb posts of a cynical pedophile, but it is not fun to prove them wrong, because they just never accept how wrong they are. At least it is a good consolation price when others start replying to you telling you how said pedophile made a fool out of himself.
shareIt's always fun to read the dumb posts of a cynical pedophile
but it is not fun to prove them wrong, because they just never accept how wrong they are. At least it is a good consolation price when others start replying to you telling you how said pedophile made a fool out of himself.
I know the definition of pedophile and I'm telling you, you are indeed a pedophile and possibly a rapist too. Only such stupid ignorant scums can be that cynical, even if you don't accept it.
Exactly, so why not prove me wrong?
I know the definition of pedophile and I'm telling you, you are indeed a pedophile and possibly a rapist too. Only such stupid ignorant scums can be that cynical, even if you don't accept it.
The fact that you are still asking that question is one of the reasons why I don't want to prove yet another pervert wrong. I've told you lots of times before and you are still asking. Imagine what would happen if we actually start a serious converstaion. A misinformed idiot can never know he's wrong until he actually opens a book, that's the lesson I've learned from engaging in such conversations with other pedos like you before, so I'll leave your education to yourself. When you feel like educating yourself about this matter, just open some social science books. Don't ask smarter people to educate you on message boards.
Sure, buddy, sure. Pedo rapists like you deserve no respect. I hope you know that, because that lack of respect will follow you everywhere. *beep* pedophile.
shareMr. Kevinology, I'm sorry to intrude into your discussion but I find it admirable that you have been able to tolerate such boring and empty replies and keep on answering. Most probably I am wrong, but it seems from what I have read in this post that Tales from the... being a 24 years old male, as he claims, is sexually attracted to teenage girls and that has produce in him a deep feeling of guilt. The way for him to release that remorse is to start a persecution against 30 years olds, age that he seems to consider as a point of salvation against his own desires. Yet, he seems deeply frightened that such salvation will never come -and indeed it wont- so he keeps on building moral walls to protect himself. Perhaps this is also the reason why he can't participate in a rational discussion, as such rationality would mean the annulment of his psychic defenses. Or perhaps I've read to much Psychology and he's only a troll. Anyway, congrats for the patience.
"Miré los muros de la patria mía,
si una vez fuertes, ya desmoronados..."
Just as people don't respect those who are unable to back up claims, they'll consider you an empty wagon. You can call me whatever you like, at least I have the balls to defend my position while you can't even grasp what the word "paedophile" means.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Mr. Kevinology, I'm sorry to intrude into your discussion but I find it admirable that you have been able to tolerate such boring and empty replies and keep on answering.
Most probably I am wrong, but it seems from what I have read in this post that Tales from the... being a 24 years old male, as he claims, is sexually attracted to teenage girls and that has produce in him a deep feeling of guilt.
The way for him to release that remorse is to start a persecution against 30 years olds, age that he seems to consider as a point of salvation against his own desires.
Yet, he seems deeply frightened that such salvation will never come -and indeed it wont- so he keeps on building moral walls to protect himself. Perhaps this is also the reason why he can't participate in a rational discussion, as such rationality would mean the annulment of his psychic defenses. Or perhaps I've read to much Psychology and he's only a troll. Anyway, congrats for the patience.
So many days to come up with a proper answer and you are still absolutely and factually wrong. As I said, I can't do anything for you if you don't open a book. What can I do? I can tell you everything that's stupid in your posts, but you won't believe me until you start reading, so you go and do that: start reading.
shareIf you have hard evidence, why wouldn't I believe you? I pride myself on being logical and I tend to favour whatever the evidence supports in discussions, even if the evidence proves me wrong. But let's say I didn't, for the sake of argument, why would you care? Even if I didn't believe you, at least anyone reading who was on the fence would be swayed by your superior points, and I would be left with egg on my face, so to speak. If not for my benefit, prove me wrong for the sake of your own dignity which is being stripped away with every post, every time you claim I'm "factually wrong" while failing to provide evidence to support these supposed facts. Someone else already noticed, others will inevitably notice too when they happen upon this exchange, so I suggest you man up and respond or end up looking like a coward. Well, you already look like a coward, but you'll at least turn that around if you're able to muster up a decent counter.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Nope. You're still a creepy pedo rapist and you're still factually wrong.
shareOh well, looks like you haven't got the balls after all, coward. Can't say I didn't give you the opportunity, I gave you multiple chances. Better luck next time, and be sure not to spout claims you can't back up in the future, alright? Off with ya.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Still everything wrong in there.
shareEh?
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
Everything you say is wrong. That's it.
shareYeah, you keep saying that over and over and continuing to reply for some bizarre reason but like I said, without backing it up, the claims are completely without substance. Grow a pair.
"He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man."
without backing it up, the claims are completely without substance. Grow a pair.
As I said before, that's one of the reasons right there. I could easily refute your ignorant posts, as I've done many times before
but you will do the exact same thing you are doing here: you will continue talking and talking without understanding the points I've already made, using the same refuted arguments time and time again.
Just like you are doing right now. I've already explained that pedo rapists like you are endless in this site, and I've already wasted countless hours with dumbasses like you who don't like accepting when they are wrong, so why would I commit that mistake again? It's tiresome.
No, rapist, I'll leave your education to actual science books. You won't accept I'm right until you open a book. In fact, you could also look up at the repercussions of raping young girls, so you can understand how much you are hurting your victims.
[deleted]
Kevin - I don't think a troll should try that hard to 'win' a debate. This is the funniest thread I have read yet on imDB.
Boondock - Thanks for the laughs mate!! Angsty whining about others' opinions, seems to be the ticket on these boards. I sense a troubled, troubled being, what with all the threats and accusations you've pulled out of nowhere.
Thanks again for the entertaining read.
Kevinology, Tales-of-a-poon, will you guys just *beep* & get it over with? The sexual tension between you two is palpable. Just give in to your desires, it's alright.
The whispering of the wise never entertains a fool.
The "debate" ended over a year ago dude, why are you even replying?
Valar morghulis
Hey, don't project your anger on to me guy; I'm not the enemy here. It's cool.
The whispering of the wise never entertains a fool.
What "anger"? I simply asked why you were responding to a discussion which happened ages ago as though we were still arguing...
Valar morghulis
I was just kidding all around, giving you a hard time. I didn't bother to go through and read your entire "discussion" with Rain Man there, so I didn't focus on the dates of your posts. Anyways, it's all in good fun. My recommendation though, next time you come across an idiot man-child like the one you argued with, I would suggest not wasting so much time trying to explain logic to someone with mush for brains. Surely you could do better things with your time. Like masturbate, learn a new language, read a book to expand your mind, or masturbate. Well, you get the gist of what I'm saying. Alright, alright, alright. Good talk, friend-o.
Visit Bob Loblaw's Law Blog!
I think I would've had to learn a new language in order to get through to that guy, but yes, usually I don't waste that much time arguing with someone whom I don't feel understands basic logic so I appreciate the recommendation nonetheless.
Valar morghulis
Any time buddy. It's nice to see that there are still people on this site that use logic and common sense when conversing or debating with others. The fool you tried to calmly and reasonably speak to used the child method of debating, which is just basically saying "I'm right and everybody who disagrees with me is wrong!" Then he just proceeded to plug his ears with his fingers basically, and ignored anything you tried to discuss with him. My 6 year old nephew uses that same method, so that tells you the mindset of that person.
Anyways, take care. Auf wiedersehen, adios and farewell.
Visit Bob Loblaw's Law Blog!
Tell me about it, sometimes I think logic is dying on the internet but it's nice to come across a like minded person.
You take care as well. Ciao.
Valar morghulis
[deleted]
When this movie came out (1991) I was 18yo, and I found her VERY attractive and bangable, and still do.
And when I was 15yo, I would have loved it if an older woman had 'molested' me, gosh I even prayed for it every day. I mean she was of legal age so what is the deal? Experimenting with sex is normal when you're a teen, the ones that DON'T do it usually have relationship problems when they get older. And it's always good to practice something if you wanna be good at it, last thing you want is to get married and not know how to do the job.
Anyway, only a religious nut (most probably in America) would be so prudish about something like this, in the rest of the world nobody gives a *beep*
*Sigh* not another ignorant stupid son of a b***. Keep your comments to yourself, no one gives a *beep* In fact, scratch that, I'll just go ahead and put you on ignore.
shareSpare me your pseudo psychology on the male sexual brain. Your condescending remark, "I understand that may be a hard concept for women to wrap their heads around,” reveals that you are nothing more than an arrogant, chauvinist pig. Forget the intimacies of sexual and emotional relationships. I pity any woman from 18 to 80 who has to come in contact with you. Perhaps, if you viewed women as diverse, vital and intelligent people, as people deserving of equal respect, you might have a chance.
On a more salient note, the age gap is creepy because there will inevitably be an unequal power dynamic. The 40 or 50 year old will likely have a much more stable career, a more dependable living situation, more expendable resources, and of course, more life experience. Add the prevailing power discrepancy between men and women in society and the creep factor starts to become quite apparent. Power discrepancies may work well to establish healthy and successful parent/child and teacher/student relationships, but they do not work well to establish healthy romantic relationships, which are better built on an even playing field.
-a female user
Whats quite creepy here is that I ve just watched this film for the first time - Im a 32 yr old female in the UK - and I think the scene where he puts his thumb in her mouth - is exactly a "creepy" scene - its supposed to make you see that Caty is manipulating her - this is building menace in the film - we know this guy is whack job rapist.....
So people saying that scene is hot - are creeps!!! I recently learned the other day in film studies is that Scorcese (I cant spell his name) actually always shows the audience who "they are".... the whole point of the coming of age of daugher was that she represented innocence - she was in school, young and naive enough to go to the theatre - even the trip to the theatre is menacing with the dark hallway - thats why she was so easy to manipulate.... and you "men" start saying its hot!!!
Sick
then we move onto the scene where Caty is going to rape her on the boat - and it is so traumatising for young girls - some like that kind of attention and some are terrified of it - some young girls do not understand as the only male effection they ve had is from their fathers and when it starts getting sexual it messes them up - they are suddenly in deep waters with a man who is too old for them - thats how abuse starts - thats why it is so creepy. Thats why her mother begs and begs him to rape her instead - as she knows what damage it will do to her daughter -
so to see her as sexually attractive after that??? as she is playing a dumb 15 year old girl? yeah you re pretty sick
Why then is it "creepy," to be attracted to a younger woman who is of legal age? Would it be creepy if I were a 35-year-old cougar lusting after a 18-year-old boy?When I was 25 I had a 40 year old girlfriend and my male friends were grossed out by it asking me I was dating an "old" woman. Damned double standards.
[deleted]
why does this change? that doesn't make any sense. a guy is going to be attracted to and want to get with an 18 year old at 18 years old and no matter how old that they get. it never changes. you're wrong. how are you a creep at 30 but not at 18?
share
That's soooo right. I mean, I am a young chick who is a little sick of hearing all this perv crap on imdb.
exactly, it's not like the girl being 17, 16, or 15 is somehow going to automatically make her less attractive than if she was 18 years old in a lot of cases if she is 15 16 or 17 she is more attractive than at 18.
share