What could have been


Love Walter Hill. I consider him a filmmaking deity, a master craftsman whose intelligent action films were the exception to the big, dumb fare that saturated the market at the time. In the late 70s/early 80s, only John Carpenter could claim to be Hill's equal.

Depending on who you talk to, Extreme Prejudice either marked the end of Hill's creative epoch, or the beginning of the lackluster second chapter of his career. I fall into the latter camp. Extreme Prejudice is rife with promise, but it squanders its potential on a ridiculous, distracting tangent involving mercenaries planning the takedown of a ruthless narcotics kingpin.

This movie should have been a pissing contest between two badasses, the grizzled Nolte and his best friend-turned adversary, the flamboyant Boothe. The two he-men, one a Texas Ranger and the other a cocaine peddler, face each other atop a cross-borders power-keg. This is a fertile premise, but one that is never fully exploited because of the time spent with these plotting commandos. Extreme Prejudice features a macho cast, but the mercenary subplot that fails to cohere with the main storyline is diverting and pointless. Hill and his screenwriters (working from a story by none other than John Milius) should have jettisoned it and instead opted to explore the nebulous web that is the southwestern drug trade while using the animus between its main characters as a microcosm.

For me, Hill's reign lasted from 1972 (when he penned the screenplay for The Getaway under the apprenticeship of his idol, Sam Peckinpah) to 1984 (Streets of Fire.) The Peckinpah-inspired Extreme Prejudice has its moments, but it falls flat.

...if that was off, I'd be whoopin' your ass up and down this street. ~ an irate Tarantino

reply

I still enjoy the movie, but I have to agree with everything you've said. It was around this time that Hill conformed to the loud, stupid action film conventions and one-liners that became fashionable after the smash hit of Commando. While there are still some artistic and serious touches in the film, such as the Nolte/Booth dynamic, they are quickly overshadowed by over-the-top violence, explosions and a teenager's mindset of excitement: elements all positiviely lacking from Hill's oeuvre all the way up to 1983.

"If you've seen one black and white movie, you've seen 'em all." - random American teen

reply

+1

reply

Personally I found the Mercenary subplot to be the most interesting thing about the film. It didn't feel to me like things tied together too well and the final showdown shootout seemed awfully short. Those would be my main criticisms of why this film feels underwhelming, especially considering what the opening third of the movie set up.

reply

^^^^Yes! McRose and the other mercs were the best part of the movie. Benteen and Cash Bailey were good, but to me the movie wouldn't be as good without the soldiers. The bank robbery and the final shootout are the best parts of the movie. In my opinion.

"Im an Ideas man Michael, I think I proved that with f#ck mountain"
-Gob Bluth

reply

i don't agree with anything the OP said. Her "ideas" on "what could have been" are just...lame. The movie that was shot was excellent in every way. The mercenary sub-plot, explosions, action, bloodshed, and music were all awesome. Easily one of Hill's best movies.

reply

Man the 70's and 80s were great for action movies! What dumb ones are you referring to?

reply

Well, we won’t be getting a reply but the OP is certainly wrong. 😀

reply