MovieChat Forums > Network (1976) Discussion > This film's detractors appear to be hope...

This film's detractors appear to be hopelessly dense


Those here who dislike NETWORK tend to present themselves as limited in their critical thinking. The movie is being labeled "pretentious", "boring", "dated", "awful"... yet those hurling such words are seemingly incapable of elaborating on their micro-summations.

Here's an idea: If you're dead set on attacking one of the most critically praised films of the '70s, have an argument of worth to back up your claims. Otherwise you're simply outing yourself as being too dim to grasp the intent of that movie.

reply

Amen!! Here Here! Bravo.

reply

I must admit I didn't enjoy it the first time around. I found a lot of the dialogue to be overly esoteric and unrealistic. The general tone felt preachy I finished the movie feeling alienated and browbeaten.

However, I gave it another chance and I realised that here was a truly great, unique piece of cinema.

reply

...have an argument of worth to back up your claims.

You might do the same thing yourself and explain why you think Network is so fabulous.
one of the most critically praised films of the '70s

Oh?

reply

Yeah, one of the most critically praised. Do some research and you'll see that every major critic sang it's praises upon release. Additionally, it was nominated for numerous Oscars.

Once you see how acclaimed the film was (and is) you'll see why I don't feel the need to defend it. Still, I don't mind saying that I hold the film's writing, acting and directing in the highest regard. It's insightful, compelling, rich with characterization and even contains a good amount of biting social satire, much of which is so darkly comical that I chuckle about elements of the movie days after watching it. To my way of thinking, this is one of the most dramatically, comedically, thematically and cinematically sound films of all time, which also remains poignant with each passing year... and it's astonishingly (and terrifying) how it's satirical elements seem increasingly realistic as time rolls on. It's a prophetic work by remarkably talented craftsmen (Chayefsky, Lumet, the cast, etc.) at the peak of their capabilities.

There. Happy?

reply

I'm interested in how you'd refute Kael's review.

reply

I'll read it in the next few days. Karl struck me as being a narrow-minded blowhard whose tastes were often in direct contrast with mine, so I'm expecting the worst. However, she does deserve credit for admitting that she didn't understand Bergman's PERSONA; a lot of critics praised it while not comprehending anything about it (Ebert's review is particularly embarrassing).

reply

Those here who dislike NETWORK tend to present themselves as limited in their critical thinking. The movie is being labeled "pretentious", "boring", "dated", "awful"... yet those hurling such words are seemingly incapable of elaborating on their micro-summations.


It's called trolling, and you're responding to it exactly how you're supposed to.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074958/

reply

Hear, hear.

reply

Spoken like a pretentious ass.

Network is a typical Sidney Lumet movie, beating the audience over the head about the obvious with a lot of bombast and flattering its pretentious audience into thinking they're so smart for being in the know about an issue everyone knew about already. Who didn't know that networks were governed by ratings and getting dumbed down as a result? The MSM was already being made fun of in movies like Cold Turkey.

All Sidney Lumley movies are like that, stating the obvious to pseudo-intellectuals. Network is the worst of them all in this respect.

reply

I never even thought about how people spoke to each other in the movie. Not sure why it was so confounding for some.

reply

Your first line is projection.

reply

Stupid people use the word "pretentious" to describe something they don't understand.

reply

You're the stupid person. The reason why Network is hyped as so intelligent is that it was written for the dumb masses who were never educated or well read enough to see how how full of shit it truly is. Read some Jonathan Swift, Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde or Voltaire. Hell, read a Greek comedy or something, then come back to this movie and be embarrassed by how impressed you were by it. Go ahead. I dare you.

reply

I've read enough thank you. I've gotten through Gravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon and Sometimes a Great Notion by Ken Kesey. Most people give up on reading these 2 books. I'm not that stupid, but I am sure you will find something wrong with Pynchon and Kesey too.

reply

hipechik is a robot. Notice the low number of posts. Replicants show up on this site every now and then to try to ruin it the way they've ruined everything else on the Internet.

reply

They really have ruined everything. Very sad.

reply

If you can't create (or at least appreciate creativity), your only option is to destroy.

reply

So true. It's pathetic.

reply