MovieChat Forums > Flesh Gordon (1974) Discussion > Which is better, Cut or uncut?

Which is better, Cut or uncut?


Is uncut better than cut?

THE MOVIE, I mean the movie! Is the uncut version of the movie better than the cut, edited version of the movie?!

But You knew that's what I meant, right?


My name is Tim, and I'm not wearing any pants!

reply

I haven't seen the uncut version of this, and I've looked high and low. If an uncut version exists, it is almost certainly a bootleg filmed in a theater back when it was in release. If you run into an uncut version, be sure and share a link with us.

My World: http://www.imdb.com/list/xV-oKAMa9aA/

reply

I'm uncut...

reply

Thank you for sharing.

My World: http://www.imdb.com/list/xV-oKAMa9aA/

reply

I've only seen the cut version... but I laughed my ass off through the entire thing and thought it was hilarious

reply

I saw the uncut version during its original release, when I was quite young,and when porn wasn't nearly as ubiquitous as now. Of course, it was titillating then. As I remember, the hardcore segments were kind of just inserted (much like Caligula)and didn't involve the principal performers. It certainly didn't advance the story.

waldolydecker

reply

Uncut here. wink wink

reply

I'd rather see the whole film and decide for myself if I like the segments which were edited out.

I'll just say that "Flesh Gordon" has always been one of my favorite movies. Anything cut in the 1970's surely wouldn't shock many viewers now.

reply