MovieChat Forums > Warlock (1959) Discussion > 'Brokeback Mountain' 1959 style

'Brokeback Mountain' 1959 style


What was unsaid back in 1959, when no one ever spoke of lies and secrets, was that in "Warlock" there was a definite "gay" relationship, suggested in the film rather than discussed, between Clay Blaisdell (Henry Fonda) and Tom Morgan (Anthony Quinn), two extremely macho gun-toting cowboys. I couldn't help remembering it when recently viewing "Brokeback Mountain," a modernized and MUCH MORE EXPLICIT homosexual relationship between Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal. "Brokeback" is, by far, the superior film; look for it at Oscar nomination time.

reply

Certainly, Morgan had a deep affection for Clay as the ideal - with the looks, charm, and manner [borrowing from Vertigo] of the definitive gunfighter, the man "who looked at him [Morgan] and didn't see a cripple".

Morg, although more talented - actually, the fastest gun in the west, could not, due to his physicality or lack thereof, fullfill his own preconception as the tall handsome stranger who cleans up the town. He became the hero vicariously through Clay.

However, it isn't clear that a gay relationship was on Morg's radar, and certainly not on Clay's. There was strong, but hetero, male bonding - short of that kind of intimacy.

In fact, Morg used Clay to kill "his girl's" [Lilly's] suitors.

reply

Any relationship to 'Brokeback Mountain' and to 'Warlock' is totally ridiculous!! Just because two strong men, Fonda and Quinn in the story are friends and contemporaries..in our modern world we have to always tag them as "gay" or "homosexual". Why do the modern films always want to smear and stain our beloved classics with the great Henry Fonda and Anthony Quinn as playing gay men. They are now giving old western movies a bad name now implying because two men like buddies are really gay!! Other western movies like 'Two Rode Together' with James Stewart and Richard Widmark and 'War Wagon' with John Wayne and Kirk Douglas....are they GAY too??!!! Most of those classic movie actors of the past would not be associated with many of the so called new art films of today...they go too far in my opinion!! Men were men and women were women...they grew up hard, strong, tough, and resilent, not weak, sentimental, sissy, gay men as they are now portrayed on the screen. I'm sorry, I was raised back in the 50's and 60's when strong leading actors were portraying our heroes...who do we look up to today?!!! In closing I really enjoyed watching Fonda, Quinn, Widmark, Malone in this great western drama, 'Warlock", well acted by all, and getting involved in the story of greed, power, love, and redemption between men and women in the old west...all for what its worth!!..not comparing it cheaply to our tainted modern movies with its ameuteurish acting, emotions, and mixed messages!! Thats not acting...and they are also giving the wrong message to our younger generation! The classic actors really knew how to act!!!

reply

Sorry Barry,but there most certainly was a clear "subliminal" message of homosexuality between the relationship of the two me. The key is, however, one character (Fonda's) was not aware of it. Quinn's however left no doubt about it. In fact, he even once said "Don't you ever put Clay down,I love him!"

Still, I strongly agree with you about the foolish comparison to "Brokeback
Mountain." Unlike with "Brokeback Mountain",the homosexuality expressed in the "Warlock" was not the central plot point of the film. The two films are worlds apart.

"Warlock" is a well made, well acted and scripted classic western film of superior quality. The homosexual tint (which I am quite certain at the time they knew they were inserting: this was no blind chance)only served to enhance the real-time complexity of the film, round out its characters, and to bring home the message that no one man by himself, without the true backing of those governed, can bring about a true lawful state.

On the other hand, "Brokeback Mountain" is a politically oriented film, of the moment, for the Gay crowd and their supporters. I seriously doubt if ten or so years from now it will even be remembered beyond the ballyhoo of today.

Again Barry, I agree with you. There's no comparison between the two films, other than the incidental one of the momentary, non-central inclusion of a plot aspect.

Allen

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

It won't be long before someone else will imply that Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday
(Gunfight at the OK. Corral, Tombstone) were also in the Brokeback Mountain gay stuff,
like Burt Lancaster and Kirk Douglas, just because they were friends;
I saw WARLOCK once, it was okay, but I don't know if it's worth watching again, those three actors in this film were in better westerns than Warlock

reply

Hi There,

Yes, I agree they were in better westerns that Warlock, but I still think "Warlock" was a well crafted film that had the guts to include a controversial topic, integrated and embedded well - without - making said part of a political agenda.

Allen J. Duffis

reply

Well you know how it is with some people. Everybody just have to be homosexual. As a matter of fact, some psychologists believe that everyone is a latent homosexual. Who next -- Bush and Cheney?

reply

"Who next -- Bush and Cheney?"

Well, now that you mention it - I always did think that Bush was Cheney's bitch. That's why Cheney shot that lawyer. He found out about their little secret and was going to expose them. The shooting was a warning to kept his mouth shut!

reply

I saw the film when it was first-run in theaters I believe or a couple of years afterward and have seen it 3-4 times since then. The last time I saw it was today, Feb 2, 2013 for what that is worth. I also read the critically acclaimed book which, I believe, was awarded a Pulitzer Prize or some other great honor. In any event, the book makes no reference hinting at a homosexual relationship between the two men, one-sided or mutual. And, I see none, necessarily in the film. I am tired of people saying there are buried references to homosexual relationships in dramatic productions/films, etc of this sort when two men happen to have a special friendship. Is there any male out there who has not had a close personal relationship with another man? So, I think the belief that there is buried here a subtle reference to a homosexual relationship is totally inaccurate.
And, by the way...I happend to be an avid movie fan and love westerns when they are well done. This, in my opinion, is an excellent film and stands up to time very well.

reply

But of course, Clinton and Gore were the best-looking bedfellows, LOL.

reply

Conservatives are more likely to be gay, particularly the ones that went to expensive boarding schools.

reply

Your research on this?

reply

Quinn's however left no doubt about it. In fact, he even once said "Don't you ever put Clay down,I love him!"


Yeah, as in brother love. It didn't mean he wanted to fudge him, especially since Morgan (Quinn) looked to be like 60 years old.

The mature and psychological script was based on Oakley Hall’s novel, which was a fictionalization of the OK Corral legends, which is why it’s not too difficult to read Earp/Holliday into the Fonda/Quinn characters and Abe McQuown’s gang as the Clanton/McLaury gang.

The fact that Quinn’s Morgan character is loosely based on Doc Holliday is a good reason to reject the supposed ‘homosexual subtext’ of Morgan. There’s not enough evidence to draw such a radical conclusion. Morgan was simply Blaisedell’s loyal, ruthless partner; he loved Blaisedell (Fonda) in the manner of close members of a military squad; or like brothers.

reply

Wow, this is an old thread you've bumped. While I don't care about emphasizing some homosexual relationship in Warlock, it did strike me that Quinn had an odd devotion to Fonda. And while Anthony Quinn was a very macho actor for the most part, I like that he went against type here and played someone who was admittedly weak. It's a fun, taut little drama.

reply

Yeah, I'm not saying that the homosexual interpretation of Morgan's love for Blaisedell isn't a possibility, just that I didn't see enough evidence to draw that extreme of a conclusion. They were close buds in the manner of Earp/Holliday; and Blaisedell was clearly romantically interested in women. Morgan knew that and accepted it.

It should be added that Oakley Hall's book never even hinted at a homosexual relationship between the two, one-sided or mutual. Again, it was a fictionalization of the Earp/Holliday legends.

reply

thank you

reply

I am so sick of this "Brokeback Crap". It seems to follow every western movie review lately. Can you say TROLL?

reply

Amen brother well said!

reply

[deleted]

as i was playing around with my new tv turner card, i taped tcm's recent repeat of warlock and after fonda and quinn are introduced to the town fathers they are lead upstairs and shown a room ,as i watched the film i could have sworn quinn said "throw out all this trash furniture and we can have a nice room with a bed here and a parlor over there " implying they were sharing that room and i was amazed i had never caught that before, however i went back and replayed the file and maybe quinn says "rooms" anyway i suppose that in the fifties no one would have ever been thinking along with a gay subtext in mind but today we look for different interpretations that reflect deeper psychological motivation for characters actions and it does somewhat enrich the viewing experience-anyway it was a interesting question

reply

Nope. Each has a separate room and a parlor. Watch it again.

reply

" Just because two strong men, Fonda and Quinn in the story are friends and contemporaries..in our modern world we have to always tag them as "gay" or "homosexual"."

Well, I'm not certain that I agree with this "gay" interpretation here, but I AM sure that I don't agree with what you say here. They seemed a lot more than "friends". I mean it's one thing to be friends, even to be willing to die for your friend, but another thing to kill everyone who threatens to disrupt the friendship. Morgan's behavior definitely has heavy strains of jealousy, and his devotion to Blaisedell goes far beyond what we would consider normal "buddies."

"Why do the modern films always want to smear and stain our beloved classics with the great Henry Fonda and Anthony Quinn as playing gay men."


Whoah! That isn't a "smear" or a "stain" unless you believe that gay men are evil. Certainly these men are killers, but they aren't "villains." The "stain" is coming from your own negative preconceptions or dare I say prejudices.


"They are now giving old western movies a bad name now implying because two men like buddies are really gay!! Other western movies like 'Two Rode Together' with James Stewart and Richard Widmark and 'War Wagon' with John Wayne and Kirk Douglas....are they GAY too??!!!"

Again these guys seem like more than "buddies", and sure there are some implicitly gay relationships in various westerns. I haven't seen "War Wagon", and I don't think I would agree about "Two Rode Together", but say for example "Johnny Guitar" with the McCambridge and Crawford characters.


"Most of those classic movie actors of the past would not be associated with many of the so called new art films of today...they go too far in my opinion!!"

And this film didn't really go that far, but from what I've heard Fonda and Widmark were both pretty liberal compared to John Wayne.

"Men were men and women were women...they grew up hard, strong, tough, and resilent, not weak, sentimental, sissy, gay men as they are now portrayed on the screen."

wow, you are really revealing your prejudices here, sorry to say. "Gay" does not mean the same thing as "sissy" or "sentimental" or "weak". Try saying that on the corner of Castro street and Market in San Francisco, and see how long you still believe that gay men are "sissies." You'll find yourself well bloodied by a few "true men" before the day is over. Anyway what you're talking about makes it sound like you really cling to the old sexist notions about men and women's true nature, that men are strong and women are weak and that men who love other men are inherently feminine. This is all very old school and at this point old hat, at least in my opinion.

"I'm sorry, I was raised back in the 50's and 60's when strong leading actors were portraying our heroes...who do we look up to today?!!!"

I'd rather look up to Johnny Depp than John Wayne myself.

Did I not love him, Cooch? MY OWN FLESH I DIDN'T LOVE BETTER!!! But he had to say 'Nooooooooo'

reply

There are male/male relationships that are not gay. People forget about the fact that sometimes a Beta male will pal up with an Alpha male. In the case of the Old West the Beta male (sometimes refered to as a side-kick) watches the Alpha male's back. (After all there are back-shooters everywhere.) Beta males also receive benefits from associating with Alpha males. They get leads for jobs, they have an easier in with women that the Alpha male reject or castoff, and they don't the responiblity that the Alpha male has to shoulder.

reply

[deleted]

How ridiculous. Gay activists try and find homosexuality it everything around them. Give it up.

reply

Please... What basis is there to describe the relationship between Morgan and Clay as gay? Clearly, Clay had a love interest with a female character. Morgan loved Clay as a partner, but not the kind of partner you are thinking of... Watch some more westerns- you'll see that straight men with guns sometimes have loyaties, bonds, and complexity without getting romantic. (Did you think John Wayne was gay for Jimmy Stewart when he shot Liberty Valance from the alley?)

reply

I didn't really notice any overt homo-erotic behavior when I watched the film recently, but perhaps there were some subtleties.

I'm not sure this is one of them, but did you notice how much delight Morgan derived from decorating their quarters?

Also, as I recall, he points out that their drapes came from San Francisco. And then later, either one of the outlaws or townspeople announces that Morgan and Clay are sleeping on sheets made of silk that came from China.

Ooh la la!

reply


My God, you people really are terrified by homosexuality aren't you? Why is that?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

The concept certainly adds layers to Morg's character. But if Morgan is all about Clay why did he use Clay to kill Ben Nicholson only to hurt Lily?

"Warlock" is an entertaining and intriguing western with fine performances from all.





"It's as red as the Daily Worker and twice as sore."

reply

Watch Warlock just know on AMC, and I must say it is highly suggestive of a homosexual relationship. I say this however it is not physical love making. Morgan's had true love for Clay and it was like any spouse of any gender. He loved Clay and was not willing to let him go especially to (another)women. After he took care of him protected his back and help put money in is pocket. Then there is the almost Shakespearean ending allowing himself to be kill in a final act of true love. The movie is not Brokeback but the message is the same "I can't let you go man".

reply

It's always the way.....If someone is doing something wrong they always try and find ways to justify themselves..AKA the homosexuals.
No what this movie has is two stories about Brothers. One by Blood the other by Choice. If Morgan & Clay were Brothers by Blood then no one would if looked at it as anything, but since they where Brothers by choice....Well you get the picture.

reply

[deleted]

You should read "it's a hell of a life but not a bad living" by Edward Dmytryk (the director of this film).
It's a good book by a long-time Hollywood worker and McCarthy witch-hunt casualty. It's deleted now, but I'm sure Alibris still have it listed.
Warlock gets it's own chaper. In it he acknowledges that most critics and viewers took it as a gay relationship, but denies that it was meant that way.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

I really enjoy Warlock. It is a fine film despite the homosexual implications, which I do not find in the least bit offensive.
There is no doubt in my mind that at least on Quinn's side, the friendship with Fonda is homosexual, underlined by the way Quinn reacts to Fonda's befriending a woman.
But that doesn't spoil Warlock as a film. I have to say I have not seen Brokeback Mountain so I cannot comment on it, but when I do I will judge it as a film leaving aside the gay stuff.

"I'll trouble you for your sabre, Captain".

reply