MovieChat Forums > Picnic Discussion > What On Earth Am I Watching?

What On Earth Am I Watching?


These people are hitting the brakes on drinking, a torn shirt. What the heck?

Holden's done called Novak 'baby' a good half-dozen times in five minutes.

reply

Was my 1st time watching this too last night, even tho I was born in 1960.
Had just gotten home from seeing Craig Ferguson perform live in concert (comedy) - host of The Late Late Show (talk show after Letterman) & was really tired, but once I started watching - I got hooked & had to keep watching to see the end.

reply

The belief is this was the first movie with an overhead helicopter shot like that, showing the bus and the train far up like that, but it seems a '48 movie has that distinction, but this may be the best known earliest one for it.

reply

I found William Holden absolutey ridiculous in this role. He was waaaaaay too old to be playing a young rebel. It was laughable. And when he kept calling old girl
"baby" I laughed out loud!

reply

Many of these things have not transcended time. Oddly enough, Come Back, Little Sheba has seemed to do so to an extent, but Splendour In the Grass and this one have virtually vanished. I would like to see Dark At The Top of the Stairs sometime, but familiar with Shirley Knight's performing abilities and can guess how she comes across. It says a lot this man killed himself when his popularity waned.

Picnic seemed like it should have been a musical.

First and foremost, like Mickey rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany's, Holden was totally all wrong in this, not that this thing was a compelling story to begin with.

Novak couldn't act her way out of a paper bag and looked bigger than any other woman she got near.

Of all these things from this era, Peyton Place makes me laugh the most and seems to be the only one remotely enjoyable. Corny, but at least you feel there is a plot moving about there.

This thing tried to hinge everything happening in relation to the silly picnic and nothing there clicked.

And this won a Pulitzer? Says a lot about the Pulitzers.

reply

"And this won a Pulitzer? Says a lot about the Pulitzers. "


The paly, not the movie, won the Pulitzer.

reply

Like the opinion of someone who seems to be obsessed with dreck like ' Real Housewives ' really means anything.

reply

😘

reply

I don't think he was supposed to be a "young rebel". He was more like a nearly middle-aged loser.

reply

I am directing the play (was supposed to be in May bit due to Covid, got pushed to October) and I love it. I think this movie went for the more romantic side of the story and less about what it is actually trying to say. The story deals a lot with missed opportunities, the loss of youth and chasing dreams. At least, that's what I see in it. the characters are multi-layered and it's a shame that people don't see that in the film.

I also agree about Holden's character. He is not a rebel, he's a guy that just can't get his foot in the door. He's always dreaming big but can't seem to land anything stable. And though I wish William Holden was younger for the role, I think seeing him older visually helps with showing how Hal is 'running out of time' to get his dreams.

reply

Exactly! If he was in his mid-twenties it wouldn't seem like such a big deal. So a really young guy is drifting around for awhile, so what? He'll get his act together. But a guy in his mid-thirties? In that case it seems more pathetic, more hopeless. He is running out of time and it doesn't look like there's much hope for his future.

reply