MovieChat Forums > Michael Avenatti Discussion > Would Democrats Really Nominate the Cree...

Would Democrats Really Nominate the Creepy Porn Lawyer in 2020?

posted 6 years ago by Satan2016 (23504)
9 replies | jump to latest

A sleazy lawyer with no political experience. That reminds me of someone else ...

https://legalinsurrection.com/2018/09/would-democrats-really-nominate-the-creepy-porn-lawyer-in-2020/

Michael Avenatti @MichaelAvenatti

We must never allow this to happen again. We must right this wrong in 2021 with a Democratic President and a Democratic Senate with the requisite votes to expand the court to 11 and recover the 2 seats. These are not normal times.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

They are just that desperate.

[–] ProductionNow (1072) 5 years ago

How is he creepy? (and whatever "porn lawyer means") He's not a porn lawyer, no such title..
He's a goodlooking man and intelligent, but happens to be a narcissistic thief who will be going to prison.

[–] ctwdidswej (212) 5 years ago

He's bald.

[–] ProductionNow (1072) 5 years ago

..."I may be bald, but you're ugly...and I can wear a toup"

(gee, and I thought bald was the ultra-trend these days)

[–] ctwdidswej (212) 5 years ago

People used to wear hats. Maybe he could wear a hat?

[–] ProductionNow (1072) 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Satan2016 (23504) 5 years ago

Lawyer for Stormy Daniels, porn star.

[–] ProductionNow (1072) 5 years ago

Yes, I know. But, that means you think he does creepy things, which is different than "being" creepy. If it's due being a lawyer to a porn actor, then you'd find Stormy creepy also.

[–] Satan2016 (23504) 5 years ago

How can anyone not know the meme "Creepy Porn Lawyer"? Tucker Carlson should have trademarked it.