https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/09/07/15/75167469-12492023-Romantic_Sam_Taylor_Johnson_took_to_Instagram_on_Wednesday_to_sh-a-46_1694095328679.jpg
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/09/07/15/75167467-12492023-Couple_The_director_56_and_actor_33_met_on_the_set_of_Nowhere_Bo-a-47_1694095333812.jpg
If you thought Daniel Craig was an absolute disgrace to the role, this guy could be even worse.
You may be wondering what the connection of that statement is to these terrifying images but it is clear - A man who would do that to himself is a serious man, a man devoid of any humour and life whatsoever.
After the damage done to the franchise by the Craig tenure, this is exactly the opposite type of casting we require when considering whether to give this (literally dead) franchise another shot.
Did Craig damage the franchise? Casino Royale and Skyfall were two of the best reviewed in the franchise.
shareEach to their own I guess. However, for me, Skyfall was an abomination and the last Craig "Bond" film I watched.
But even Craig fans would have to concede that he did literally kill the franchise character - something that no previous incumbent - in over 20+ movies - felt they needed to do in order to give interest to their tenure...
Craig is fine as an action star, but he's not a great Bond. Bond is supposed to be suave and I find Craig to look old and ugly.
share