MovieChat Forums > Masaki Kobayashi Discussion > Better than Kurosawa.

Better than Kurosawa.


No offence to Akira because he's great, but Kobayashi is my boy.

reply

[deleted]

Great trilogy, although Seppuku is my favourite of his films.

reply

NO OFFENSE TO MASAKI...BUT WHEN YOU SAID KOBAYASHI...ALL I COULD THINK ABOUT WAS A TINY ASIAN MAN STUFFING HOT DOGS INTO HIS MOUTH.🙂

reply

(All of this is my own opinion, so take it for what it's worth).

As much as I like Kobayashi I just don't think he made enough truly great ones to be considered an equal, let alone better, director than Kurosawa. Kobayashi made two indisputable cinemic classics whch do indeed equal Kurosawa's best (Hara-Kiri and Kwaidan), two very good films (Human Condition and Samurai Rebellion) and three solid films (Black River, Hymn to a Tired Man, and Inn of Evil), and a lot of lesser stuff. His early 50's works are pretty forgettable, and his last few were glorified tv miniseries. By contrast, Kurosawa made at least 12 classics (Rashomon, Ikiru, Seven Samurai, Throne of Blood, The Lower Depths, Hidden Fortress, Yojimbo, Sanjuro, High and Low, Red Beard, Kagemusha and Ran) plus several other very solid films (Drunken Angel, Stray Dog, Dersu Uzala, and Dreams), although he had his misfires too (The Quiet Duel, Scandal, The Idiot, Record of a Living Being, The Bad Sleep Well, Dodes ka-den, Rhapsody in August and Madadayo). Most of his early pre-Mifune films, aside from one or two, aren't that great either. Still, at his best he was unbeatable. If Kurosawa had a true rival among his countrymen, it was Mizoguchi.

reply

Kurosawa directed a lot more so I think that it accounts for more of his good and bad movies. I like Kobayashi better as a director and story teller. I think he has more rewatch value to his films. The problem with Kobayashi is that he did a lot of movies that are hard to find. On IMDb he did movies that haven't recieved many votes.

reply